Will you watch 2 1/2 Men without it's resident warlock?

Will you watch Two and a Half Men without it's resident warlock?

  • YES, I will continue to watch the show without him.

  • NO. Without Charlie, I'm out.

  • I will START watching if they replacde Drunky McCrazypants

  • WHAT the deuce is Two and a Half Men??


Results are only viewable after voting.
I was tempted to select "WHAT the deuce is Two and a Half Men", but decided not to vote, because I know what 2 1/2 Men is, but never watched it, and won't watch it with Charlie gone.
 
I would still watch. I'm not a huge fan but the one liners have always been hilarious which means the writers are the geniuses, not Charlie. I don't think it would be too hard to replace Bi-winning, isn't Hollywood full of aging Peter Pan's who can't get a grip? All they'd have to do is drive-by the Playboy Mansion and see what drags itself out of there, put him in a bowling shirt and an IV of penicillin and we're off again.

OK, that was kind of mean... not exactly untrue but sort of mean anyway.

BTW, I think different people laughed at different things. When I watch the show I was never laughing WITH Charlie & his antics, I was laughing AT his ridiculous character because I have met guys who are like this. The cheesiness totally cracks me up.
 
I would give it a try. I watch it now all the time (new episodes, plus the repeats on FX).

I love all the supporting players - maybe they could bring Jane Lynch's character back and have her conduct sessions with the cast over Charlie either rehab or whatever they do with him.

LOVE Jane's Lynch on that show - she's hysterical as the therapist.

I think Jane Lynch is a little busy on a little show called Glee.
 
I would still watch. I'm not a huge fan but the one liners have always been hilarious which means the writers are the geniuses, not Charlie. I don't think it would be too hard to replace Bi-winning, isn't Hollywood full of aging Peter Pan's who can't get a grip? All they'd have to do is drive-by the Playboy Mansion and see what drags itself out of there, put him in a bowling shirt and an IV of penicillin and we're off again.

OK, that was kind of mean... not exactly untrue but sort of mean anyway.

BTW, I think different people laughed at different things. When I watch the show I was never laughing WITH Charlie & his antics, I was laughing AT his ridiculous character because I have met guys who are like this. The cheesiness totally cracks me up.

Exactly how I feel. :thumbsup2
 

Nope. Didn't watch it then, won't watch it now. I agree with the poster who said Charlie Sheen is probably going to get his own reality show.
 
I have not watched a single episode so I have no dog in this fight. However, I hear people saying the show has no chance to survive without it's tiger-blooded star. I personally think just about anyone is replaceable. But let's find out what you guys think.

So your choices are:

YES, I will continue to watch the show even without him.

NO. Without Charlie, I'm out.

I will START watching if they replace Drunky McCrazypants

What the deuce is Two and a Half Men?

My answer didn't fit your poll. I used to watch it, but haven't watched it more than once or twice in the last year. The show has run it's course. It was good the first few seasons, but is close to "jumping the shark." It won't survive without Sheen.
 
Sorry, none of the above.

I never watched the show but heard that it was 'family viewing'. I watched it while visiting a friend.

Charlie wanted a hooker. His brother asked him to be sure to get a quiet hooker. At the end of the show, she shows up, unable to speak or hear, but a hooker nonetheless. Family show? You have got to be kidding.

ETA:

I was wrong!! My friends were wrong!! It comes on at 9 PM, all is well with the world.....sorry about that.
 
Sorry, none of the above.

I never watched the show but heard that it was 'family viewing'. I watched it while visiting a friend.

Charlie wanted a hooker. His brother asked him to be sure to get a quiet hooker. At the end of the show, she shows up, unable to speak or hear, but a hooker nonetheless. Family show? You have got to be kidding.

Where the heck did you hear that?
 
Sorry, none of the above.

I never watched the show but heard that it was 'family viewing'. I watched it while visiting a friend.

Charlie wanted a hooker. His brother asked him to be sure to get a quiet hooker. At the end of the show, she shows up, unable to speak or hear, but a hooker nonetheless. Family show? You have got to be kidding.

Maybe Manson Family viewing:scared1:
 
Where the heck did you hear that?

Maybe Manson Family viewing:scared1:

A few people that I talked with. But with both of yours comments, I just looked it up and it is on at 9 PM. So that is certainly late enough and the kiddos should be all tucked in by then.

I sit corrected. :surfweb: If it comes on at 9, clearly it is not a family show.

As Emily Litella (from SNL) used to say.....nevermind.......
 
would still watch...

we watched because of Cryer not Sheen. Though we have not watched regularly for a while. It is our Monday back up if the regular shows aren't on.

I think it would be silly to put someone else in Sheen's character. They should write that character out and a new character in. Give the show a new direction and a fresh start. I would watch more if they did this.

:wizard:
 


Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE








DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom