The Sweetness said:
I think the DP is a great idea. I just wish it didnt have to be a package. Id love to be able to get a discounted room or FL discounted passes....
I suspect that the problem with that sort of thing would be that the appropriate price-point would be far higher than most folks would be willing to pay. Part of the cost of offering the program to DVC members can be allocated to marketing DVC; if they're offering the program at the current price to folks getting heavily-discounted rooms, the discounts already therefore allocated to marketing, then to what can they allocate the corresponding costs? If you cut the revenue down too much more, just imagine how much more the restaurants are going to have to cut costs.
Lynne M said:
I wonder what happens to the WDW newbies who don't use these boards, get the dining plan and have no idea that they have to make ADRs. Are they able to use their TS credits? Or are they paying $37.99 a day for counter service food?
Nah. I suspect most will reasonably ask, "Where can I get a TS meal right now?" FWIR, the CMs can now go into the computer and find the nearest restaurant with availability. So at MK, that could send guests to the Kona or Grand Floridian Cafe; at Epcot, that could feed Spoodles or Cape May; etc. So it's a win-win: Everyone gets a nice meal; some of Disney's less popular restaurants get a boost in patronage; and Disney gets an additional bump in capacity attributable to guests-in-transit. (For more info on that, search for old messages on "Why are there boats from the Beach Club to Epcot?"

)
1. Go back to the regular menus, but only offer certain selections to people on the DDP.
That would defeat most of the allure of the Dining Plan. Many folks are sold on the fact that they can order anything on the menu. Introduce "limited menu" and the price-point of the offering plummets.
2. Reserve a certain percentage of tables in every TS restaurant for walkups.
Sub-optimization is not a good option either. Practical remedies need to be a win-win-win -- not just a change that benefits what is becoming a smaller percentage of the customer-base.
This lets them keep two very imporant groups of customers happy: the locals who decide to dine at WDW on the spur-of-the-moment
It really isn't clear that they've been too adversely affected. While I'm sure there are lots of locals who will chime in, "NOT ME," I believe most locals who visit WDW restaurants aim towards the signature restaurants or DTD restaurants, which have been barely affected by the Dining Plan. (Indeed, I suspect most of the locals who would disagree with that are Disney addicts, not just locals looking for a good meal, so they're going to be visiting WDW anyway, regardless of the dining situations, as they always had, before WDW restaurants got good in the early 1990s.)
and the new visitors who don't understand the need for ADRs.
My suspicion is that these folks would be among those least disappointed. They'd catch on to the, "Gosh this is really good stuff, since it is so hard to get reservations," aspect of it, and as I suggested above, find their way to the nearest available restaurant, chalking their experience up to their own lack of knowledge.
Along with all of those who don't want to or can't plan their meals months in advance.
This is the only group of people I believe will truly be uniformly disappointed. However, Disney will know if they're a large group or a small group, and if they're a small group (as I suspect) then it won't matter much in the grand scheme of things.