Why is Hillary Clinton Divisive????

Some of us Michiganders think she is very Divisive! She won Michigan barely against an box marked uncommitted. Many people didnt even bother to vote since she was the only large candidate. Obama and Edwards weren't on the ballet! I would love to see who REALLY won Michigan in a fair election. :mad:

Ok! Now there is real example of Divisiveness.:thumbsup2
Thank you.

But I dont know why she had her name on the ballots & the others didnt!:confused3 I will look into that story.
 
I've given this a lot of thought, even starting my own thread a few weeks back trying to figure out why I hate her so much.
My background, female mid-40's, white, upper income, liberal, independent...
I can't put a finger on why I hate Hillary, I don't hate powerful women in general at all.
But I think the most IMPORTANT question should be:

"If it's just an intuitive hate for Hillary, shouldn't we be taking a much harder look at it?"

I've always listened to my gut and I'm seeing so many others that can't pin down why they feel so strongly against her. I've got to side with my intuition on this one. I'm not going to get on an elevator, alone with a guy that gives me the heebie-jeebies, why should I elect someone president that gives me the same feeling?

Thats fine, we all have the same feeling about people (regardless of who they are), then more or less try to find ways to reason these feelings or assumptions. I get that!

But how is she divisive, is what I dont get.:confused3
 
"If it's just an intuitive hate for Hillary, shouldn't we be taking a much harder look at it?"
People have been scrutinizing the heck out of her for 15 years now. They've dug into everything she's ever said and done. Other than murdering Vince Foster, what have they turned up to justify the hatred?

And, to be clear with my point, if you don't want to vote for her because you have feelings you can't explain, so be it. But I don't think the fact that you (and others) have this irrational hatred should count against Hilary and be used as excuse for others to not vote for her.
 

Now here's a question. If she won, would we be able to dismiss all of the criticism against her as people just being "Clinton Haters" as those of us who have criticized GWB the last several years have had to put up with from people on this board?
 
I think Obama is every bit as "divisive" as he alleges Hilary to be. Obama's campaign seems to be a repeat of the 2000 Bush campaign. "I'm a uniter, not a divider."

It wouldn't surprise me to find a Karl Rove clone in charge.
Oh, please. :lmao: There is absolutely no similarity between the Obama campaign and the Bush campaign. They couldn't be more polar opposites. One appeals to the idealist in everyone while the other tried to scare people into voting for him. One features high-minded rhetoric designed to inspire, the other appealed to the basest emotions of xenophobia. There is no similarity between the two at all.
:thumbsup2 I am with you on that one!

Isnt he really being divisive by creating ******* in the primaries, saying she sides with Republicans on issues...etc.
Isnt working with the other party senators actually a good thing (regardless of the issue), to me, thats the opposite of divisive.

It's not being divisive by pointing out differences between the two of them, and that is not what people mean when they speak of her being divisive anyway. They - and I, but we've gone over this - are simply pointing out that there is a rather large percentage of the population that have a preconceived hatred of the woman and have no intention of changing anytime soon. No matter how much you may not like that, it is simple truth.

As for working with the other party...no, there is nothing at all wrong with that...unless they are wrong and you're only doing it out of political cowardice (see: Iraq Authorization Vote).
 
Just because you say it, dont make it so.
Give examples please.

Thank you.

If you seriously do not see why people have a visceral reaction to Hillary, I'm not sure I can explain it to you. I know in my case, I had to read through her site to find out her positions, because I am so turned off by her personality, voice and demeanor that every time she opens her mouth I want to run from the room. Nails on the chalkboard! I don't even have that reaction to shrubby. He's dumb, and that's annoying in a POTUS, but I don't find him grating to listen to.

Just because you don't know any people like me, doesn't mean we don't exist, and in numbers. And those I know IRL who do support her, readily admit she has issues with her personality and credibility. I'm not sure why you don't see what we see.
 
She definitely rubs a lot of people the wrong way. The last time this was brought up, I posted how she threatened Senators Bradley and Moynihan if they didn't fall into line on her health care plans. Said she would "demonize" (her word) any senators who stood in her way. Bradley said that was it for him; he's had no use for her since and has endorsed Obama.

I figured this would be a pretty good example of divisiveness, since these were two highly respected Democratic senators. But the OP told me it didn't count because these were two men complaining about her! Nothing divisive there, no sirree.

Someone else said it didn't count because it was in Bernstein's book, which was "slanted." Never mind that those were Bradley words, and he stands by them. So I conclude that Clinton's supporters are in denial.
 
Oh, please. :lmao: There is absolutely no similarity between the Obama campaign and the Bush campaign. They couldn't be more polar opposites. One appeals to the idealist in everyone while the other tried to scare people into voting for him. One features high-minded rhetoric designed to inspire, the other appealed to the basest emotions of xenophobia. There is no similarity between the two at all.

Actually, the 2000 Bush campaign wasn't based on fear, as 9-11 hadn't happened yet. His 2000 campaign was touting change and uniting the country, just like Obama. Bush was presenting himself like Barney "I love you, you love me." Family Values, et al. Warm fuzzies.

The 2004 Bush campaign was fear based.
 
I think it's because she has a lot of baggage, and as a result makes an easy target. She would definitely have an uphill battle to prove herself to her critics, and even then some will never give up old grudges.

I agree that this is probably her worst problem, although there are plenty of people who don't like her based on her current self as well.

Some people don't have to like the "person" but will vote for the positions they have. I don't like her personally (she's smug, arrogant, elitist) and really don't like her policies on just about everything. Is that rational enough for me do dislike her?

I agree about her personality. I really don't like her for her. I do think that she is intelligent, and I agree with a lot (not all) of her policies.

Would I ever be her friend? Even if I traveled the same social circles I doubt it. Do I think she would do a good job with the country? Yes, I do.

I vote based on policies, not popularity.
 
Actually, the 2000 Bush campaign wasn't based on fear, as 9-11 hadn't happened yet. His 2000 campaign was touting change and uniting the country, just like Obama. Bush was presenting himself like Barney "I love you, you love me." Family Values, et al. Warm fuzzies.

The 2004 Bush campaign was fear based.

There's a point there, but I would argue that Obama has sincerity on his side, has shown no history of lying to voters, and has successes in his past based on his own merits, not his Daddy's connections. I would also point out that there have been no dirty tricks pulled the way Bush did in 2000 on McCain.

Just because Shrub paid lip service to the ideals Obama actually believes, don't equate the two in your mind, as that's where the similarity ends.
 
There's a point there, but I would argue that Obama has sincerity on his side, has shown no history of lying to voters, and has successes in his past based on his own merits, not his Daddy's connections. I would also point out that there have been no dirty tricks pulled the way Bush did in 2000 on McCain.

Just because Shrub paid lip service to the ideals Obama actually believes, don't equate the two in your mind, as that's where the similarity ends.

Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me. I'm just not buying what Obama is selling.
 
Some of us Michiganders think she is very Divisive! She won Michigan barely against an box marked uncommitted. Many people didnt even bother to vote since she was the only large candidate. Obama and Edwards weren't on the ballet! I would love to see who REALLY won Michigan in a fair election. :mad:

I think she can be divisive for some women. I have no respect for her. I would love to see a women president, but not her. I hate how it appears she sends Bill out to do her dirty work, or to whine on her behalf that people are being mean to her. And I think its partly due to how she handled Bill and Monica. She (in my mind) rolled over and blamed everyone on the republican side. Then they seem to continue like he never did anything wrong. If my Dh did that and IF I took him back, he would be walking funny for years from my shoe! (It seems like his indiscretions were never addressed by her.) I want a better role model for my DD than her.


Do you have a transcript of their private conversations? And anyone that dislikes her b/c she stuck with her husband through an affair really needs to reevaluate taht position. Do you not know anyone that stayed with their spouse after an affair? What are your thoughts towards them? Did you lose all respect for them?
 
Oh, please. :lmao: There is absolutely no similarity between the Obama campaign and the Bush campaign. They couldn't be more polar opposites. One appeals to the idealist in everyone while the other tried to scare people into voting for him. One features high-minded rhetoric designed to inspire, the other appealed to the basest emotions of xenophobia. There is no similarity between the two at all.

See folks. I believe *this* is why we can't "just get along". When you have people like wvrevy frequently telling us that the "high minded" (read: enlightened) people are better suited to run the country for themselves and the scared little lemming xenophobes (bigots and racists too).
 
I think she's divisive because her last name is "Clinton".

Rightly or wrongly, she will be attached to her husband's administration/personal behavior/etc. and that in and of itself generates a whole spectrum of negative and positive emotional responses. Hence the divisiveness.

Personally, I don't find her all that divisive, but as a fiscal conservative, I disagree with many of her core representations and I'm scared to death of what she would do in office.
 
I don't hate her and don't hate anyone. You would have to do something pretty damn bad to me to earn that type of emotion. My reasons for disliking Hillary Clinton have already been mentioned in this thread, so no reason to repeat them. In my business I have two accounts that both have me reporting to powerful women who I have no problem working for. So don't lump me in that category.

I don't listen to talk radio and have no desire too. I dislike Limbaugh, Hannity, Coulter, about as much as Hillary and have no use for any of them. I think for myself and my dislike and uneasiness about the Clinton's doesn't come from smug, blovating hypocrites who make a living on the radio. The Clinton's earned my dislike and distrust of them all on their own. I find them to be slick, dishonest and arrogant at times. While they're both capable of doing good things for the American people and have done so, they also have a corrupt, kind of a dark side to them both. I read enough books on them and having watched them in the WH for 8 years and followed politics pretty close back then, I formed my own opinion. Please don't belittle or dismiss my thoughts and feelings about her, just because you disagree with them. There's more to the Clintons than meet the eye and some of the things they do and say, just don't pass the smell test for me.


Having said all that above, If Hillary is elected POTUS, then I will accept that a majority of my fellow Americans think different from me. I give my word as an American, she will have a fair shot to prove me wrong. Who knows? She could actually get something positive done and accomplish a great deal. She could be one of the best Presidents we ever had. I love my country and I owe it to this nation to give her a shot and the respect a sitting POTUS deserves. If she does get elected, I hope other Americans like me, will do the same.
 
If you seriously do not see why people have a visceral reaction to Hillary, I'm not sure I can explain it to you. I know in my case, I had to read through her site to find out her positions, because I am so turned off by her personality, voice and demeanor that every time she opens her mouth I want to run from the room. Nails on the chalkboard! I don't even have that reaction to shrubby. He's dumb, and that's annoying in a POTUS, but I don't find him grating to listen to.

Ok I have that exact same reaction to Bush. But it started with the issues then his voice and fake laugh ...... then his stupidity, his stutter - his lack of vocabulary....... then his stupid decision on Iraq!
 

:thumbsup2 Thanks! I can clearly see her being divisive in this case. I will review the Florida thing to. That is a bit different, all the names were on the ballot, and the GOP changed the date there.


Now here's a question. If she won, would we be able to dismiss all of the criticism against her as people just being "Clinton Haters" as those of us who have criticized GWB the last several years have had to put up with from people on this board?

:thumbsup2 I can be very objectionable! Some will talk against her because they just hate her, some complaints will be valid.

Oh, please. :lmao: There is absolutely no similarity between the Obama campaign and the Bush campaign. They couldn't be more polar opposites. One appeals to the idealist in everyone while the other tried to scare people into voting for him. One features high-minded rhetoric designed to inspire, the other appealed to the basest emotions of xenophobia. There is no similarity between the two at all.

As with all campaigns ther are some similarity's. On the issues No, but on the style of the campaigns yes I do see similaritys.

It's not being divisive by pointing out differences between the two of them, and that is not what people mean when they speak of her being divisive anyway. They - and I, but we've gone over this - are simply pointing out that there is a rather large percentage of the population that have a preconceived hatred of the woman and have no intention of changing anytime soon. No matter how much you may not like that, it is simple truth.
Yes we have. If people hate her, then they hate her! Thats fine by me. But in this case...there is a very specific word used "Divisive" and that is what I dont see. Except for the MI primary given above.

In other words, if ANYBODY calls somebody a negative word, I really like them to back it up with some proof. Thats all.


If you seriously do not see why people have a visceral reaction to Hillary, I'm not sure I can explain it to you. I know in my case, I had to read through her site to find out her positions, because I am so turned off by her personality, voice and demeanor that every time she opens her mouth I want to run from the room. Nails on the chalkboard! I don't even have that reaction to shrubby. He's dumb, and that's annoying in a POTUS, but I don't find him grating to listen to. .
Even though I dont agree with you, I do understand that this is your opinion of her. And that is just fine by me. Say I called you Divisive, (i wouldnt do that) and then many other people started saying Honu is divisive. wouldnt you want to know why I said that. Dont you need some facts to back that up with?

Just because you don't know any people like me, doesn't mean we don't exist, and in numbers. And those I know IRL who do support her, readily admit she has issues with her personality and credibility. I'm not sure why you don't see what we see.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: You just made a HUGE leap of faith with that remark. :lmao: I do know people who view her precisely the same way you do. I know people in my real life and certainly on the Disboards, who say the same thing as you. However, I cant see how you all see that in her, I dont. That is just a difference of opinion, that all.:confused3 And so far know no one has convinced me otherwise.:confused3


She definitely rubs a lot of people the wrong way. The last time this was brought up, I posted how she threatened Senators Bradley and Moynihan if they didn't fall into line on her health care plans. Said she would "demonize" (her word) any senators who stood in her way. Bradley said that was it for him; he's had no use for her since and has endorsed Obama.

I figured this would be a pretty good example of divisiveness, since these were two highly respected Democratic senators. But the OP told me it didn't count because these were two men complaining about her! Nothing divisive there, no sirree.

Someone else said it didn't count because it was in Bernstein's book, which was "slanted." Never mind that those were Bradley words, and he stands by them. So I conclude that Clinton's supporters are in denial.

I can see her saying that. But that was one instance under alot of pressure. And I am not excatly sure that Bradleys man feeling were a little shrunk by this remark. So it dont hold too much weight with me.
 
Do you have a transcript of their private conversations? And anyone that dislikes her b/c she stuck with her husband through an affair really needs to reevaluate taht position. Do you not know anyone that stayed with their spouse after an affair? What are your thoughts towards them? Did you lose all respect for them?

For me, I gotta say I pretty much admire her for that! I think she handled the whole situation quite admirably.

As far as their marriage, thats between them to and no one else.

As for him....I wouldnt have very many Man friends if I was so outraged by his actions and deeds.:rolleyes1
 
Do you have a transcript of their private conversations? And anyone that dislikes her b/c she stuck with her husband through an affair really needs to reevaluate taht position. Do you not know anyone that stayed with their spouse after an affair? What are your thoughts towards them? Did you lose all respect for them?

If my Dh cheated on me I wouldnt blame other people for it. He did it, no one but him and her. Years ago men were "Allowed" to have their other women and the wives mostly looked past it. That is what in my mind happened with them, she looked past it. She never said "My husband screwed up, what he did was wrong, I love him and we are going to work on our marriage." Even if she chewed his butt in private, in public it was a 'vast right-wing conspiracy’. And he didnt do this just one time, the man has a history (and these are only the ones we know about) and she appears to have a history of rolling over and ignoring it.

I want better for women, and for myself and DD. I dont want DD to ever roll over and let her Dh cheat on her someday while she goes on with life like it never happened. We all deserve respect from our partners and she should get hers from Bill also or kick him out. If he wasnt president he would be called a pig for his actions. I think this is why older women are voting for her more than younger women, it isnt acceptable to the younger generations.
 


Disney Vacation Planning. Free. Done for You.
Our Authorized Disney Vacation Planners are here to provide personalized, expert advice, answer every question, and uncover the best discounts. Let Dreams Unlimited Travel take care of all the details, so you can sit back, relax, and enjoy a stress-free vacation.
Start Your Disney Vacation
Disney EarMarked Producer






DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Add as a preferred source on Google

Back
Top Bottom