JCJRSmith
US Navy Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2003
- Messages
- 2,213
Does he like football? Does he have a favorite team? (No Texas Stadium jokes)hokiefan33 said:God is most certainly not human, but he is male by nature, and NOT female.
Aidensmom said:I agree, He is not human, so you really cannot assign a gender. I believe the entity of God is really something beyond our human understanding.
hokiefan33 said:Wow. OK, on that note, we have clearly reached the irrational, ridiculous stage of this debate, and I am out. Further arguing is pointless. It really is too bad that more Christians aren't decrying this line of thinking, though.
hokiefan33 said:Wow. OK, on that note, we have clearly reached the irrational, ridiculous stage of this debate, and I am out. Further arguing is pointless. It really is too bad that more Christians aren't decrying this line of thinking, though.

Aidensmom said:I agree, He is not human, so you really cannot assign a gender. I believe the entity of God is really something beyond our human understanding.
JCJRSmith said:Would that be Landover Baptist ?

Crankyshank said:You know what? You're right. God is a guy. A flamboyant, bisexual, drag wearing, HGTV loving, singing Heart in the shower kind of guy.


FencerMcNally said:As to your specific question, I believe that the entity which we usually refer to as God the Father (or the Creator, if you prefer) is infinite. Since God is infinite, God is male/female/neuter. God is everything. I do not have the gall to suppose that I can assign human personality traits to an infinite being. God is inifinitely merciful, infinitely just, infinitely good, infinitely resolute, infinitely unsure. God is the Ultimate Reality, the Ultimate Paradox, about which I can have no true 100% knowledge.
That is how I think about God. That is how I view God philosophically.
How I feel about God? I am a Christian. Specifically (and I know what's going to come after this) I am a Roman Catholic. Theologically I agree with, oh say 95% of the Church's teachings.
Politically I am a liberal, and so I disagree with some of the Church's temporal/political policies.
Regarding other religions, I am a pluralist. My religion is what is best for me, and I believe that it is absolutely true for my own existence. I recognize in most other religions the exact same fundamental principles as in my own. We differ chiefly in ritual practices and a few (usually less than a dozen) doctrinal/theological ideals. Ultimately all religions are concerned with moving the individual away from self and towards an Ultimate Reality (variously called God, Allah, Yahweh, Nirvana, Brahman, etc.) I can say that my beliefs are absolutely correct and still respect and recognize the validity of others' beliefs because it's a subjective universe, baby.
Bottom line, no one has an exclusive monopoly on Truth, and when you argue as though you do, you come out sounding very, very, very stupid. A hypothetical outside observer on our little world, looking down objectively at all our beliefs and superstitions would say that no one has any reasonable, rational, irrefutable evidence or logic to say that their religion or philosophy is right and someone elses is wrong.
(I almost guessed you were a Southern Baptist, and as you're from Virginia, I have a sneaking susupicion you might even be someone I used to know...)
the difference is you're far more articulate about your faith than i am and while raised Catholic I'm now Episcopalian.Ah no. We reached that point around this time:hokiefan33 said:Wow. OK, on that note, we have clearly reached the irrational, ridiculous stage of this debate, and I am out. Further arguing is pointless. It really is too bad that more Christians aren't decrying this line of thinking, though.
hokiefan33 said:We SHOULD consult the Bible for every answer, we SHOULD NOT form our opinions from scientific studies, Biblical religion is RIGHT, any non-Christian person or country is WRONG, who cares about foreign relations and diplomacy. That is the way it OUGHT to work, but unfortunately never will.
Crankyshank said:You know what? You're right. God is a guy. A flamboyant, bisexual, drag wearing, HGTV loving, singing Heart in the shower kind of guy.
The Jewish view through the Torah/Tanakhhokiefan33 said:Incorrect. To be sure, the noun used in the OT is actually not gender specific, and can be used to refer to male OR female, but not just male.
So, why throughout the NT (and in the OT as well, for that matter) is God referred to as the Father, or Him? I know the nouns used in the NT are male-specific? Did He change from neutral to male???
Please.
Chuck S said:Oh my goodness, you just described J. Edgar Hoover.

scubamouse said:![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
ok that's also downright scary!
and Rick - can we triple date? I think lucky chang's would be perfect don't you![]()
jekajekalynn said:Aww....come on hokie.. you KNOW you want to beat the love of Jesus into a few more ppl.![]()