NY Disney fan
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2005
- Messages
- 5,255
I know people say sugar is bad but I was wondering if both of these are bad for children? What is the best alternative? (ie: for baking, for pancakes, for hot cereal, etc).
I know people say sugar is bad but I was wondering if both of these are bad for children? What is the best alternative? (ie: for baking, for pancakes, for hot cereal, etc).
Out of the 3 to choose from, I would say plain sugar.
All things are ok in moderation. The problem is so many people do not realize what is in their food. HFCS is in many crackers, cookies, breads, pasta, ice cream (even the "all natural" kind), bagels, english muffins, some milk (especially chocolate), salad dressings, sauces, spaghetti sauces, peanut butter, jellies, etc. and when you're eating a little of those every day, it adds up to way more than "moderation".
Yes, it's crazy how you can't find stuff without it these days unless you buy organic stuff, etc.
I think it is a big part of the problems we're having that we didn't seem to have 30-40 years ago...our foods have changed a LOT.
Except to process HFCS they have to put it through a mercury wash. Real sugar is the way to go. Why eat chemicals if you don't have to?If you must use one-High Fructose Corn Syrup is much safer than Splenda. It is an actual natural product that has simply had the fructose-fruit sugar content increased-splenda-sucralose-no matter how you slice is-is a chemical-it is in fact a cholrine molecule-chorline is a poison-pretty much no contest there. the best no calorie sweetner choice is Stevia-its plant derived and not an old ball chemical compound. Actual sugar is not a death trap used in moderation you know.
I am currently reading "Master Your Metabolism" by Jillian Michaels which is about how the things we eat/drink affect our hormones which in turn affect our bodies in SO SO many ways. I won't bore you with all of the details but one of the most impressive (in a bad way) facts was that only 3,000 tons of HFCS was produced in 1967, today 9.2 million tons of HFCS are produced which means we're consuming a lot more than we should be. In the book she writes about how HFCS interacts with the hormone ghrelin and that it suppresses it's ability to tell you when you're full (this was the gist of it as I don't have the book in front of me right now). There's lots of studies on the numerous other affects HFCS has but she just stuck to things that had actually been proven (so far) in the book. Chemically made sweeteners are all bad for you (splenda and HFCS). Lots of studies are being done all of the time but it's yet to be seen if the generation that has been exposed to these artificial sweeteners the longest (the current kid population) will have any increases in cancer, diseases, etc. in relation to the artificial sweeteners. I highly recommend reading this book to everyone.
I use organic honey and agave nectar when I want to sweeten something up. I'm looking into Stevia too.
All things are ok in moderation. The problem is so many people do not realize what is in their food. HFCS is in many crackers, cookies, breads, pasta, ice cream (even the "all natural" kind), bagels, english muffins, some milk (especially chocolate), salad dressings, sauces, spaghetti sauces, peanut butter, jellies, etc. and when you're eating a little of those every day, it adds up to way more than "moderation".
Another good book is "Sweet Deception" by Dr. Mercola. It is not only about the dangers of artificial sweeteners but also about sugar lobby and their power. It is a good read. I'm a big fan of Dr. Mercola.
As far as knowing what is in the food, that is why I am a label reader. I never used to be but once you start it is amazing the stuff that is in the food we eat. It looks like a list of science experiments. I avoid as much processed food as I can now, especially anything like baked goods.
High fructose corn syrup is worse.Which is worse to give a kid: high fructose corn syrup or splenda?