On wdwmagic.comI didn't realize you were the person who posted "The Osborne lights were just officially announced for this year this week"...so I'm asking again, where did YOU see the announcement?
I would hate to see the Lights go![]()
As far as I'm aware it's not officially back for 2015 yet. There are tons of rumors for that area and with the backlot tour now closed who knows what will happen.Found this in regards to 2015 lights... http://touringplans.com/walt-disney-world/closures In the DHS section it lists the lights as starting on 11/5/15. I am hoping this is true because this will probably be the one and only time we go during the time they are up.
Hey gang, Tristan here, I'm Breezy Osbornes husband. I will try to quash some of the rumors.
The Osborne licensing agreement is signed in 5 year increments, and the last one was signed shortly before Jennings passed away.
As far as his "Children" asking for a licensing fee, this is false. Firstly there is only one child, his daughter, Breezy. Breezy and her mother Mitzi are the only two people with any say about the lights and I know for a fact that they both want to lights to run at Disney for eternity and they will never ask for a licensing fee for the use of the family name / story.
We usually spend a good amount of time with the lighting team and directors as they have become like family to the Osborne's over the years the lights have run. We've heard no mention of the lights being removed altogether, although we have been told they would "find" a new home in the event that the studio's were being revamped. This wouldn't be the first time they have moved the lights, and we've been given no reason to think they will be moved anytime soon. Of course you also have to remember that each and every attraction at Disney has it's own team of directors and they don't always let other dept's in on plans until they are inked. So we may not know about any moves for the lights until the year that they are moved.
All that being said, since there is no monetary gain in the Osborne's favor in using the lights and never will be, Disney could break the contract with the Osborne's anytime they'd like and wouldn't be under any assumption to have to fork over any payment /penalty to them.
If you have any more questions I'd be happy to answer em.
Thanks for all the Osborne light love!!!![]()
Hey gang, Tristan here, I'm Breezy Osbornes husband. I will try to quash some of the rumors.
The Osborne licensing agreement is signed in 5 year increments, and the last one was signed shortly before Jennings passed away.
As far as his "Children" asking for a licensing fee, this is false. Firstly there is only one child, his daughter, Breezy. Breezy and her mother Mitzi are the only two people with any say about the lights and I know for a fact that they both want to lights to run at Disney for eternity and they will never ask for a licensing fee for the use of the family name / story.
We usually spend a good amount of time with the lighting team and directors as they have become like family to the Osborne's over the years the lights have run. We've heard no mention of the lights being removed altogether, although we have been told they would "find" a new home in the event that the studio's were being revamped. This wouldn't be the first time they have moved the lights, and we've been given no reason to think they will be moved anytime soon. Of course you also have to remember that each and every attraction at Disney has it's own team of directors and they don't always let other dept's in on plans until they are inked. So we may not know about any moves for the lights until the year that they are moved.
All that being said, since there is no monetary gain in the Osborne's favor in using the lights and never will be, Disney could break the contract with the Osborne's anytime they'd like and wouldn't be under any assumption to have to fork over any payment /penalty to them.
If you have any more questions I'd be happy to answer em.
Thanks for all the Osborne light love!!!![]()