Our car insurance is up for renewal and I'm reviewing our policy. We have a 1999 Honda Accord with both collision and comprehensive insurance which costs us $210 per year and we have a $500 a year deductible. The Kelley Blue Book value for the car is $2750 for a trade-in, $4025 for a private party sale and $5975 from a dealer. I know the rule of thumb is if your coverage is more than 10% of the value of the car and we are not quite there yet, but still I am wondering what I should do.....WWYD?
First off let me say that I currently own an insurance agency for the last 6 years and was an adjuster for 9 years as well.
Insurance companies don't use the Kelley Blue Book. Most will use the NADA value to settle a claim. They will take the retail value of the car and then add/minus based on milege, condition, and extras. However, some companies will also use market survey companies such as Total Logic and CCC to settle a claim on a totaled car.
With all of that said; you have a very low premium for having full coverage on your Honda, I would recommend keeping the full coverage on that car a little while longer.
I have one car that's a 1996 Geo Prizm. NADA book value is around $1800. I dropped the full coverage a couple of years ago and then got side-swiped in a parking lot month later. It was the other driver's fault but he never reported it to his insurance. They tried several times to get a statement from him but got nothing, so they dropped his coverage and I was left high and dry. I did find a guy who fixed the body damage for $300, so having to pay the deductible would have been worthless for me.
Your car is worth more though, so you may want to keep the collision coverage for at least another year but lower your collision deductible to $250. It will only cost you about $30 every 6 months for the lower deductible.
Your's is an excellent example of the advantage of full coverage. If the other person does not have insurance or have a problem getting the other company to pay without full coverage you are left holding the ball.
A side note here. Uninsured/underinsured motorist on your policy does not apply to the property damage to your car, it applies to your ability to collect for liabilty for injury. However, some states do offer uninsured property damage for a car carrying liability only.
Also, as for the deductible; that is a tough one to call. When an insured does make a claim for collision and they are at fault they do run the risk of their rates going up. Many prefer not to make a claim for only a few hundred dollars. Lowering your comprehensive may be an excellent idea though. Claims falling under comp with most companies will have no bearing on future rates.
We were involved in an accident with someone (at fault) insured with USAA - they offered us over $2k less than retail - and the "comps" they used weren't comparable at all. I ended up having my insurance company pay for the damages (total loss), and they subrogated to USAA.
If we hadn't had full coverage/rental car, we wouldn't have been able to do that, and the $$ offered by the at fault's insurer wouldn't have come close to replacing the car.
Again, an excellent example of full coverage working to your benefit. I have run into this often with clients of mine where the other company either does not want to own up to fault or delays the process.
Finally, a side note. When you do have to rely on your company to settle when it is not your fault, your deductibles will apply. Once your insurance company subrugates and receives the settlement they have to indemnify(reimburse) you first and will refund your deductible.
Sorry for the long post. If anyone would like some advice or have any insurance questions you can pm me. However, with that, there are many different laws and coverages from state to state, and some laws may be different here in Ohio than your own state. But still, I'm fairly familier with most states.