MarkBarbieri
Semi-retired
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2006
- Messages
- 6,172
What path did you take to get to the gear you have now and why did you choose it?
I started as a kid in the 70's with a 126 camera. If I recall, it was fixed focal length, fixed focus, and probably even fixed exposure. I didn't use it much.
In the mid 80s, I bought a Minolta 7 series (I can't remember the exact model). The model used "creative" cards. You could put these little cards in and modify the behavior of the camera. It was cool in the marketing, but useless in real life. I bought a couple of cheap zooms to go with it. It was where I learned about exposure, composition, and other basic concepts. After a few years, I trashed it on a canoe trip and decided to quit shooting for a while.
After that, I bought a basic waterproof 35mm point and shoot. It sufficed for a couple of years, including my honeymoon. I always hated not having an SLR though.
I finally decided to re-enter the SLR world in the mid-90s. I bought a Canon Rebel (pre-digital). I liked the fact that Canon had started offering image stabilized lenses. Given that my favorite hobby was still canoeing, having a stabilizer was a big selling point. I bought a basic 28-100(ish) lens and a 75-300 IS.
I fell in love with photography again once I had an SLR to play with. After a couple of years, I upgraded to an Elan. It offered a higher frame rate, eye controlled AF, and a few other features that now escape me. It was also the quietest camera I'd ever heard. I used both bodies for several years.
I added a 28-135 IS lens for better IQ and more IS capability.
In 2001, I took a three week vacation to Colorado, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico. I was tempted to get a Canon D30, but it was only 3 megapixels and cost over $3,000. Instead, I shot 50 rolls of film on the trip at a cost of about $500 for film and processing.
In early 2002, Canon released the D60 (6 years ahead of Nikon
). It was $2,200, but I figured that it would pay for itself in a couple of years on the film savings alone. I also added a 17-40mm wide angle lens to recapture some of the wide angle ability I lost going to a DSLR. At the time, Nikon was the only other make of DSLRs and they offerred no compelling reason to switch from Canon.
In 2003, my camera gear was stolen from my hotel room in Oklahoma City. My insurance replaced it. I upgraded from a D60 to 10D. I replaced the 17-40 and 28-135 with the same lenses. I upgraded the 75-300 with a 70-200 f/2.8 IS lens.
In 2004, I decided that I was missing too many shots because of the limited buffer and relatively slow AF capability of the 10D. My industry (oil and gas) was booming and times were good, so I bought a 1DM2.
I've been happy using it for almost four years now. I'm considering adding a new FF camera later this year and possibly an APS-C camera as well. The new Nikon's (D3 and D700) are quite tempting and most of my shooting friends are Nikon shooters. Still, I think I'm going to stick with Canon as I expect them to answer pretty effectively soon.
I started as a kid in the 70's with a 126 camera. If I recall, it was fixed focal length, fixed focus, and probably even fixed exposure. I didn't use it much.
In the mid 80s, I bought a Minolta 7 series (I can't remember the exact model). The model used "creative" cards. You could put these little cards in and modify the behavior of the camera. It was cool in the marketing, but useless in real life. I bought a couple of cheap zooms to go with it. It was where I learned about exposure, composition, and other basic concepts. After a few years, I trashed it on a canoe trip and decided to quit shooting for a while.
After that, I bought a basic waterproof 35mm point and shoot. It sufficed for a couple of years, including my honeymoon. I always hated not having an SLR though.
I finally decided to re-enter the SLR world in the mid-90s. I bought a Canon Rebel (pre-digital). I liked the fact that Canon had started offering image stabilized lenses. Given that my favorite hobby was still canoeing, having a stabilizer was a big selling point. I bought a basic 28-100(ish) lens and a 75-300 IS.
I fell in love with photography again once I had an SLR to play with. After a couple of years, I upgraded to an Elan. It offered a higher frame rate, eye controlled AF, and a few other features that now escape me. It was also the quietest camera I'd ever heard. I used both bodies for several years.
I added a 28-135 IS lens for better IQ and more IS capability.
In 2001, I took a three week vacation to Colorado, Utah, Arizona, and New Mexico. I was tempted to get a Canon D30, but it was only 3 megapixels and cost over $3,000. Instead, I shot 50 rolls of film on the trip at a cost of about $500 for film and processing.
In early 2002, Canon released the D60 (6 years ahead of Nikon

In 2003, my camera gear was stolen from my hotel room in Oklahoma City. My insurance replaced it. I upgraded from a D60 to 10D. I replaced the 17-40 and 28-135 with the same lenses. I upgraded the 75-300 with a 70-200 f/2.8 IS lens.
In 2004, I decided that I was missing too many shots because of the limited buffer and relatively slow AF capability of the 10D. My industry (oil and gas) was booming and times were good, so I bought a 1DM2.
I've been happy using it for almost four years now. I'm considering adding a new FF camera later this year and possibly an APS-C camera as well. The new Nikon's (D3 and D700) are quite tempting and most of my shooting friends are Nikon shooters. Still, I think I'm going to stick with Canon as I expect them to answer pretty effectively soon.