LoveMyDisneyCats
Mommy of 3 Princesses
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2006
- Messages
- 339
I didn't say anything about offering a short term contract to me when I'm 66. Heck- they better offer me another 50 year contract. I plan to live till I'm over a hundred and plan to go to disney every year of that long life
Plus even if my kids inherited my contract I'd imagine they'd want a long-term contract renewal (if they continue talking about disney EVERY day like they do now...)
I actually agree with the no short term extension option. I think it would allow too many people "in" that don't really want the same "disney" experience that I want. Or they'll sell or rent points to people that appreciate it for what it is. I's just like to see a renewal option that won't cost $700/pt. (or at least that, at the rate it's going. I bought in at $67 or $68/pt)

I actually agree with the no short term extension option. I think it would allow too many people "in" that don't really want the same "disney" experience that I want. Or they'll sell or rent points to people that appreciate it for what it is. I's just like to see a renewal option that won't cost $700/pt. (or at least that, at the rate it's going. I bought in at $67 or $68/pt)
If DVC was interested in short term contracts they would have an alternative NOW for all of the 66-year olds out there.
Disney wants to lock people in long-term and the problem with offering 15-20 year contracts is that you can't limit sales to just people in their 60s. If someone in their 20s or 30s inherits a contract in 2040 and is then able to renew it for a short term at a good price, that defeats the purpose of selling long-term ownership to young families.