I honestly thought I'd read every post on the thread and I can't recall anywhere reading that we were talking about a parent's car here. Did I miss that somewhere, or did some of you just assume it wasn't the kid's car?
Yeah I love that excuse the police are busy no kidding there busy its there job.* Not only is her gas being stolen but the kid is trespassing on her property she should talk to the police. And if the parents are lacking which they seem to be. I would still go over there and talk to them everytime the gas disappeared.
By acting like a dumb teenager yourself what does that prove. Besides your lacking in the brain department. Then if something does happen to the little darling who stole the gas.* The police will doubt your word about the incident.
No doubt they are busy, it's their job (the police that is). I think anyone who would try to talk to a theif about something he/she stole is lacking in the brains department, but that's just me.
No doubt they are busy, it's their job (the police that is). I think anyone who would try to talk to a thief about something he/she stole is lacking in the brains department, but that's just me.
Yeah I love that excuse the police are busy no kidding there busy its there job.* Not only is her gas being stolen but the kid is trespassing on her property she should talk to the police. And if the parents are lacking which they seem to be. I would still go over there and talk to them everytime the gas disappeared.
By acting like a dumb teenager yourself what does that prove. Besides your lacking in the brain department. Then if something does happen to the little darling who stole the gas.* The police will doubt your word about the incident.
What excuse. We had two bicycles, and food stolen from our garage. We caught a guy in broad daylight stealing our lawnmower. The police filed a report, and that was the end of that. That is just the way life is.
Judging from the posts here, had the thief broken his ankle, riding my bike, I would have been the one in trouble. Funky thought process, for sure.
My son had 2 bikes stolen on ONE night. A few days later, we saw a guy riding up the street with the bike. He was a big kid (if he was a kid at all) who looked to be well over 18 riding a kid's bike (trick type bike). My husband pulled the car around, made the guy get into the car and took the guy AND the bike to the police station and nothing was done. We were allowed to take my son's 1 bike back, but by this time, so much damage had already been done to it that we really didn't want it.
The kid got NOTHING, nor was there any other follow thru.
That's basically how it goes.
I honestly thought I'd read every post on the thread and I can't recall anywhere reading that we were talking about a parent's car here. Did I miss that somewhere, or did some of you just assume it wasn't the kid's car?
At least you got the bike back...kind of...
We had a whole room of curly maple paneling stolen from our cabin. It was eventually found (solving 200 thefts in the area) but we couldn't "prove" the boards were ours. So we never saw them again. I know there is some police officer with a great hunting cabin, somewhere.
Do we know that the kid bought the car? Pays the insurance? Pays for the repairs? Does it matter? The response to damage the car is disproportional to the crime. This is a police matter and has been since the kid stepped across the property line. The police need to handle it. Edited to add, did anyone even approach the parents in this situation? That would have been my first response.
What excuse. We had two bicycles, and food stolen from our garage. We caught a guy in broad daylight stealing our lawnmower. The police filed a report, and that was the end of that. That is just the way life is.
Judging from the posts here, had the thief broken his ankle, riding my bike, I would have been the one in trouble. Funky thought process, for sure.
All you have to do is look at past winning civil suits and criminal prosecutions to know that often the "victim" is held accountable when their actions caused harm to someone committing a crime against them
Using your bike analogy. Bike stolen and they wreck it...no liability on your part.
You sabotage the bike because you think someone is going to steal it.... civil and possible criminal liability if the thief is injured or killed, or if the sabotage caused injury or death to a 3rd person.
Nothing funky about my thought process. I've heard of way too many real life examples in which the "thief" was victorious in suing their victim, or cases where someone has been tried and convicted when their actions have caused harm or death to a "thief"
Well, I'll be honest. Funky wasn't exactly the f-word I was think about in my opinion of a justice system that favors the perp over the victim.![]()
Your other post didn't say anything about the justice system. It seemed like a direct dig at anyone here who expressed an opinion that the OP could be held liable.