Kendra17
"Kendra17" is a consortium of political analysts a
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2004
- Messages
- 1,919
chobie said:My DH is a public school teacher and he is not happy about the schools selling junk to the kids either. And no one will answer you challenge and come right out and defend this practice of the school selling this stuff to the kids will they? It's indefensible. They should not be selling unhealthy stuff to the kids. Public schools are not a profit-making industry, nor should they be.
My son's school changed their policy this year. They now do NOT fry foods. Period. They sell oven-baked fries and oven-baked chicken and they've FINALLY limited the amount of dessert/snack foods one can buy. They are permitted ONE dessert from the lunch line.
And, before this, his lunch cost 1.75 each day and this did not include dessert. If he wanted dessert, he'd have to bring in some extra money-- the account he had was for actual lunch only. I would give him the money whenever he asked, because he only wanted a mini ice cream sandwich.
I completely agree that schools should NOT be pushing airheads or anything that has absolutely NO nutritional value at all. I'm okay with an ice cream, but airheads? Slushies? Elementary school doesn't seem the place for this kind of stuff, and I would be complaining to the principal and school board if I were you.
At my son's school, they bring in a mid-morning snack for themselves. This year, they changed the rules for this, too. It HAS to be healthy. Or it has to have the facade of 'healthy'. Granola bars are okay, for instance as are some other treats that really aren't too healthy, but you are no longer allowed to send in Doritos or anything like that.
I wonder if some parents are upset at these new restrictions. I haven't asked but I'm going to find out Monday. I'm okay with these new restrictions, obviously, but I can see how some might be upset on principle.