I disagree strongly with that sentiment. As major theme parks are becoming more and more reliant on screens and IP, and the content they're basing the rides on is constantly getting cheaper there's going to be questions starting to be asked. Is it worth going to a theme park that is nothing more than a glorified multiplex, when I can watch that same content at my house for ten dollars a month? Also people have more options for leisure then ever before. Download a brand new game, stream thousands of movies and tv shows instantly, play in intricate gaming worlds, and buy and begin reading an ebook in a matter of seconds, etc. We have so many more options, and theme parks are sacrificing a lot of their marketable difference. They need to tread a very fine line.Comparing the WDW/Universal to BB/Netflix is apples and oranges. Netflix didnt run BB out of business. Technology changes did. Sort of like do you see any record stores around anymore? Target and Walmart didnt run them out of business. technology changes. Nonsense to compare the two because it is vastly different. There isnt a technology that is going to run WDW out of business. If anything they create most of the technology other parks mimic. Disney Seas is a prime example. Again, Universal is a one trick pony. Harry Potter is not well planned and is a miserable time in small spaces, their rides consistently have flaws and the theming is below average. Its more like a glorified Six Flags, vs the actual theming and effort put into things at WDW when they take the time to do them right and not try to overreact to Universal and just throw something together.
Indeed, I don't know if you've been following along any of this VR stuff but gets better all the time. Imagineering has been at the front of the push, and plans to bring it into the parks and homes too. The problem? If I can have a great VR experience in my house why bother going to the park? I'm kind of in shock that the organization can't see that it's creating it's own method of destruction.
Last edited: