Unfortunately the risk of going to a park in Europe can't be remotely compared to visiting one in the US. The EU countries got the virus under relative control. In the US it's out of control. Europeans have been vastly more compliant individually in terms of taking responsible steps to wear masks and follow social distancing protocols. Europeans are typically aghast at what is happening in the US today.
It's important to note that when some parts of Europe started to open in early May, there were still hundreds of cases daily. In Germany, and in Portugal, for the last month there are hundreds of new cases a day,
but usually under 10 deaths per day. So as Colleen noted, while cases are not flat, deaths continue to decline. This has been the trend almost everywhere in western and central Europe, even as travel has resumed and restrictions lifted and large gatherings permitted.
Europa Park is probably a good case study, as there was no elimination of the virus, yet no increase attributed to opening. Of course the situation in Florida is more significant, but still this shows that countries do not need to go the extreme route of NZ and try and eliminate the virus entirely before opening.
The glorious Ba Na Hills reopened in 30th April, but as Vietnam has contained the cases and reduced to almost zero, it
isn't a great case study. I don't see anything specific if they are keeping cable cars separated by family groups but other than masks, everything seems back to the wonderful kooky 'normal' of this amazing place.
But we need non-essential spending to get people back to work, and it is impossible to ignore the pressure to do so now that the stimulus check is a distant memory, the unemployment supplement is coming to an end, and evictions are starting to get rolling again. The last forecast I saw said analysts are expecting 7 to 10 million households will be evicted as this year as a result of the pandemic - that's between 5 and 8% of all American households. Governments and companies are going to have to take the impact of continued closures into account as they move forward, or the human suffering will be catastrophic.
Chris Patten brought up this week when he was speaking on the shocking events of 1st July that COVID has completely taken over the global mindset, and that this gave great timing to implement the law. He's right - certainly I have seen zero mention of this on this site in the last few days, despite this being in the media elsewhere as the main headlines, and the top discussion amongst my circle, and what makes me feel sick to consider the implications. We were talking about Article 38 in particular yesterday over lunch and someone said that the US COVID discussion was overtaking the story globally. (Thankfully, we were all from the very short list of countries which have publically spoken out, but I'm not even sure if any of the American readers have seen any information in their media)
While this is of course a major global pandemic, the reality is that life goes on for everyone and COVID is not the only topic. Many of us are dealing with other serious or critical illness (and cannot get the proper treatments and therapies as the world is on hold for COVID) Other things are happening around the world, and are not being discussed in the media. People are going to be starving in many parts of the world due to the lack of travel, the lockdowns, the impact on supply chains, the lack of harvests, etc.
We have to find a way to balance the needs of
all people, and that may mean making difficult and unpopular decisions.