WDW - Night Shots

[BorisMD]

I'll throw a few in to the mix:

 

[Boss Hogg]

I've got a few to add to proceedings...

 

[Merrywheather]

Here are a few, all with my Canon Rebel XTi

F/9, 20 sec, ISO 200, 22mm

f/4, 1 sec, ISO 1600, 27mm

f/10, 1 sec, ISO 200, 46mm

 

[dpic]

 

[dpic]

Here's some more. Sorry, I was too lazy to copy down the exif for the shots. I'd be happy to provide if anyone would like.

 

[MarkBarbieri]

Couldn't we separate these into separate night shot threads based on camera brand?

 

[WDWFigment]

Couldn't we separate these into separate night shot threads based on camera brand?

I'm fairly new to this board, so I mean this as a serious inquiry and with no disrespect, but is this more a photography board or a Disney photography board? If the former, I totally agree that the brand distinction would be a good one. If the latter, I don't really see it as a meaningful distinction. I mean, if viewed for the "pretty shots," camera type is irrelevant, and if viewed to learn from EXIF data, the data is equally applicable regardless of brand (unless you want to split hairs on what camera has the best high ISO performance...and most of these shots are probably using a tripod, and at ISO 200, anyway, so that doesn't matter). Perhaps distinctions based on park (AK/MK/EPCOT/DHS) would make more sense?

I guess before we go any further, the question is: so what "type" of board is this?

 

[Michele]

I'm fairly new to this board

Well, we should explain that this is Mark being a smart alec.

 

[MarkBarbieri]

Yeah, it's a pretty good idea to ignore everything that I say, including this statement.

 

[wenrob]

I'm fairly new to this board, so I mean this as a serious inquiry and with no disrespect, but is this more a photography board or a Disney photography board? If the former, I totally agree that the brand distinction would be a good one. If the latter, I don't really see it as a meaningful distinction. I mean, if viewed for the "pretty shots," camera type is irrelevant, and if viewed to learn from EXIF data, the data is equally applicable regardless of brand (unless you want to split hairs on what camera has the best high ISO performance...and most of these shots are probably using a tripod, and at ISO 200, anyway, so that doesn't matter). Perhaps distinctions based on park (AK/MK/EPCOT/DHS) would make more sense?

I guess before we go any further, the question is: so what "type" of board is this?

Mark is just being a smarty pants, lol. He'll come in here and give us two paragraphs and say, no, he is serious but he's just having fun.

 

[WDWFigment]

Yeah, it's a pretty good idea to ignore everything that I say, including this statement.

Ahhh, man, I've been punk'd!

It's okay, you'll get yours...

 

[wenrob]

Here's some more. Sorry, I was too lazy to copy down the exif for the shots. I'd be happy to provide if anyone would like.

Um, is this a guy? That's a pretty buff Tink.....

edited:Maybe it's the motion blur that makes the shoulders and chest look broader and the jaw more square?

 

[Pea-n-Me]

Mark =

 

[GoofyontheHiSeas]

I know the title says WDW, but here is California Adventure a night.

F/2.8 1/2sec ISO 100

 

[Quicklabs]

This one just makes me smile...How many times do you suppose that Grandpa opened his wallet for this little cherub that day?

 

[dpic]

Um, is this a guy? That's a pretty buff Tink.....

edited:Maybe it's the motion blur that makes the shoulders and chest look broader and the jaw more square?

Ha, ha. I posted a couple of Tink photos 3-4 years ago and it went about 10 pages on whether Tink was a man or woman. Honestly, I think it's just blur, her positioning, and all the junk she has to wear. During that discussion someone said she needs to be around 100 pounds or less to qualify. That would be a pretty small guy.

 

[Jeff Fillmore]

A few more...

EXIF

EXIF

EXIF

 

[Timeless]

 

[dpic]

A few more...



EXIF

Nice shot, Jeff. I always enjoy your stuff.

Note to self: buy star filter

 

[annnewjerz]

Nice shot, Jeff. I always enjoy your stuff.

Note to self: buy star filter

I don't want to speak for Jeff because I'm not pooooositive of this, however I don't believe he used a star filter. This picture alone has been my inspiration to hit AK on our trip in December for evening EMH (which I always avoid like plague) and because of that, I think he said he used the Sigma 30 1.4 for this shot on a tripod doing a longish exposure. I found out when taking shots of my Christmas tree this year that the longer the exposure, the better my stars were.