lockedoutlogic
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Apr 26, 2007
- Messages
- 15,781
The only title I'd like to see attached to him at this point is "emeritus"
Last edited:
... shot down the claims that ESPN and ABC are bias[ed] saying he has worked with ABC and ABC News for 25 years. He called claims "complete exaggeration."
LOL, not false, just "exaggerated". And apparently the exaggeration is "complete" As in ... unfair or having no purpose except as a kind of bullying pickiness?
Never mind the political implications - the takeaway is, ABC news is peddling a lot stale, pandering gibberish, is probably also in fairly steep viewership/revenue decline, and you can begin to mentally strike it and everything else old-school network related off your list of "bright spots for the Disney Corporation".
Someone brought up a specific incident on ESPN that I never realized happened and Bob shot that down as complete exaggeration.LOL, not false, just "exaggerated". And apparently the exaggeration is "complete" As in ... unfair or having no purpose except as a kind of bullying pickiness?
Never mind the political implications - the takeaway is, ABC news is peddling a lot stale, pandering gibberish, is probably also in fairly steep viewership/revenue decline, and you can begin to mentally strike it and everything else old-school network related off your list of "bright spots for the Disney Corporation".
Someone brought up a specific incident on ESPN that I never realized happened and Bob shot that down as complete exaggeration.
3. Attendance is down but profits went up. Isn't that what shareholders would like?
I was in attendance at today's meeting and I liked Mr. Iger's (repeated) explanation of why he will stay on Trump's council.
I have no problem with that...as the head of a major corporation, if you're asked to be on an advisory board of the government...you say "yes"...
Not if attendance continues to trend down even further.
What shareholders would want is growing attendance AND growing profits.
They're gambling that avatar and Star Wars will bring attendance and spending up kicking and screaming...no matter what...long term.
I disagree...even though they will get a Star Wars bump...the amount of their core audience that is being shed daily because they can no longer afford it is too much. And remember...we are in a good economy.
and
Maybe i'm old-fashioned, but when the President of the United States asks you to do something, or serve in a position, you say "yes'" no matter what party the president belongs to.
I hate that is all folks are focused on, when in reality, its a minor to non-existant issue. Folks should be focused on 1) declining attendance, 2) The long range plans for Epcot, 3) ESPN, 4) The Future of Disney Corporation, and so on.....
Ugh, using reason and logic instead of rhetoric and emotion. Knock it off!
I haven't seen any specific stories but they don't like to talk about personal things at these meetings. This guy apparently was a WDW employee for 13 years, and then was fired. He also never received recognition for 10 years of service. Iger claimed they looked into his issue and determined his firing was valid.Anyone know the backstory of the guy that got up during the Q&A complaining about being systematically discriminated against? Apparently he spoke at last year's meeting too. Can anyone point me to threads here that cover this?
There are always some people that so that kind of stuff.When Eisner was CEO, stockholder Evelyn Davis was always at the Disney shareholders meeting, criticizing Eisner's salary and asking lots of questions about the governance of the company. She would always try to talk through the entire question and answer session that was designated for shareholders. She was a shareholder in other major companies and followed the same pattern. It was always a hoot to listen to the webcasts of the shareholder's meetings just to see what she would ask about.