Angel Ariel
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- May 1, 2006
- Messages
- 8,293
MickeyMinnieMom said:I didn't mean theto be condescending at all.
Value is in the eye of the beholder. I think it's worth it for: a cool new experience in the castle, a chance to see characters up close without waiting in line, and reserved areas for fireworks and parade. I hardly care about the desserts, though we'll certainly have some.
Since they've made this "exclusive" by virtue of venue size, it makes sense for the price to be higher. A PP put it well, I thought... they're marketing this to a group within an already small-ish group of people willing to pay for ticketed events. If there's an audience for that at this price point it'll continue. If not, it won't.
And one could argue that the following is what all businesses do with their offerings all the time: "This event seems to be "let's see how much we can charge and how little we can give for it."" Sounds a bit like finding the optimal price for a product / service. Seems like their shareholder mandate, depending on how you look at it.
Of course value is in the eye of the beholder. What I first started responding to.in this thread was the idea that people who can't/don't want to spend the money are wanting to make sure others can't do it either. I was just trying to.illustrate that.one can.dislike the event, and not.feel it is a good value, without it meaning they want to deprive everyone else from participating.