It's not that it is frowned upon at all.
Lets take this particular thread as an example.
1. The OP saw a special offer for a villa.
2. They then sent a message to the owner saying they would like to book the villa
3. The owner messages back (albeit some time later) to say that they have already taken a booking.
Now, understandably the OP is upset at missing out on the special, however the FACT is, the owner did not at anytime (as far as I'm aware) confirm the booking to the OP.
So the OP did not have a booking
The OP has not had a booking cancelled
The OP didn't even have a confirmation of a booking
The OP isn't out of pocket
The owner actually took the booking from a separate website that they also had the offer advertised on.
I think the OP was just annoyed about missing out, communications has been so quick up until that point that understandably he was upset that he now had to find another villa when it seemed this was what they were looking for. I don't believe his orginal post the OP mentioned being out of pocket. Just a general rant which we all have from time to time - part of life, it doesn't always go our way!
Yet here in this thread the owners reputation has probably been damaged, I know the owner or site hasn't been named, but it's not exactly hard to work out
What is important to one person isn't important to another. Should the reputation of a villa owner be allowed to be damaged by one unsubstantiated bad comment?
I think we are all grown up enough to understand that we all have our own minds and as you say what is important to one individual will not be important to another. I very much doubt that a 20 post thread on here is going to be remembered by people who are looking to book a villa in the future.
Forums are very powerful things and can easily sway the thoughts of it's readers and they have to be managed responsibly. A fourm owner can not allow unsubstantiated, un proven facts to be tossed around in public.
From what I can see, the OP has no proof of what they are accusing the owner of, they aren't out of pocket and they were not promised anything!
The OP hasn't accused anybody of anything, just presented the facts
On the site in question, it is stated that all transactions are explicitly between the renter and the owner. The site is just the advertising medium in the same way as advertising on TV, Radio or Newspapers.
If I came on here and said I've heard that "xyz Holiday Company" are going bust, how many people that read that would still book with that company? I think most wouldn't take the risk and would think twice, even though there is nothing to back up the claim! I would also expect the moderators to ask me for my source or remove my post.
This would be great in theory, however how can you trust the reviews?
As with this thread the OP may have left a bad review for the villa owner, yet the villa owner hasn't done anything wrong.
I have seen many really bad reviews for hotels that I have stayed in and found the hotels to be fantastic.
Think of a hotel you have stayed in and had a great time, now go and look at the reviews for that hotel on the review sites. In a lot of cases you will find bad reviews! You will see glowing reports and scathing reports for the same hotel.
People have different standards, some people book a 2 star cheap hotel and expect 5 star luxury.
Tesco Direct, Amazon, Trip Adviser, Ebay, all use a review system for the products or services that they sell, some will have good reviews, some will have bad reviews, again eople have different views on items, and it's up to the customer to decided based on what they read whether they should or shouldn't go with that particular service or offer. We all use reviews in everyday life to help influence our decisions, they are not gospel just a help.
There are ALWAYS two sides and unfortunately Forums very often only present ONE side and people get sucked into believing that one side!
Nothing derogatory has been said about anybody or any property and we are just having a discussion, on a discussion forum,