Just finished this thread and was glad the OP decided to ditch the Volvo. Just too many things going against it. That tire wear is unreal.
I knew as soon as I read the OP was considering a Chrysler there would be many posts telling her to skip it and buy a Honda or a Toyota. Better much, it seems thats where all auto talks on here end up. Even down to the suggestions to buying a used Honda or Toyota over a new other vehicle. I totally do not agree with this opinion, but thats just me. I have been more than pleased with my entire lifetime of GM vehicles. Some have been better than others, but for the prices I have paid (smaller sedans usually, currently 11 year old Olds mini-van), it has worked well. I just plain don't like the styling of either of the suggested brands either. I suggest any buyer consider all the factors when buying a car or truck. Consumer Reports has never really thrilled me with many of their product recommendations for everything from cars to soap.
The folks who have pointed out so well current prices on used vs. new cars get my vote. There are great deals to be had on new vehicles right now that make the previous advantages to buying used not the rule it used to be.
To the PP who suggested looking into Lemon Law. It has been around a dozen years, but I used to be very familiar with LL for my job. At that time, virtually all states required vehicles to be within the first 12,000 miles and 12 months (other states 24/24) to be considered...with multiple repairs for the same manufacturers DEFECT, usually safety related. Or 1 repair for a major safety item (the cutting off would count, but not as this age and mileage). Also many states required it to be a first owner. Or a 2nd owner that purchased the vehicle in the LL period. Many days out of service for warranty defects (like 15-20) during the LL time would also be reason to pursue LL. Basically, I don't remember ever seeing a state that would cover a vehicle at this age and miles. The Volvo may be considered a lemon by many of us, but not by the state laws. The tire wear on the Volvo makes me wonder if it may have been involved in an accident earlier in it's life that was not fully/correctly repaired that has led to ongoing issues.
One last thought.....in my family, we would consider the wife (me

) driving the DH SUV and my DH buying a smaller, more gas efficient car that would also have cheaper maintenance costs. I may be wrong, but many times maint costs are more on a bigger vehicle. Since the OP puts so few miles on a vehicle, it would be cheaper for her to drive the big guy. Then her vehicle is also the family vehicle. This strategy has worked well for our family. I have been driving the Olds from the start, and DH has had a couple of smaller, cheaper cars. He has a decent work commute, I am a SAHM. My van has only around 105,000. His 7 year newer car has almost the same miles, but it is cheap to keep and cheaper to replace.
Good luck OP on whatever you decide
