I have been familiar with IBCCES for many years as we used to regularly have APs to our local Six Flags. I had explored it annually but always decided at last minute to not pursue it because DS does not ride the big rides there with the long switchback queues. But I did think from what I
was told that a doctor's note and documentation directly addressing the park would be required.
So much has been learned via this thread, other online comments and discussions, other social media platforms. One thing was that IBCCES will take just about anything for approval so I didn't need to be concerned about the doctor's note - something I wasn't comfortable asking for since theme parks are not an important component in life. I already ask him to fill out multiple documents for important things. I've learned IBCCES is just what I consider somewhat pointless if they are giving it away like candy.
One thing I learned I'm honestly disappointed with ....
DS uses AAP. We had years where they attached it to his AP so we didn't have to visit GR but once a year. I think some of us have heard of the GAP, a more difficult pass to get but not really sure what it does. Since IBCCES has become involved, I am seeing more and more discussion online about the Gold AAP, I think this and GAP might be the same thing. It is being described as basically VQ
Front of the Line Pass. Being escorted direct to load. Those who now get it are thrilled. At this point since it is being put out there as an option people are requesting and getting for things Disney might not even give a
DAS ... between this and the IBCCES process being so lax are we about to see a big run on UO for assistance passes? Have they opened a can of worms? The publicity they are getting from this might actually increase the request for these two passes.
Anytime there is big news and discussions about disability assistance passes at theme parks I think we risk tipping the scales and possibly facing a reduction in assistance offered. So far I've found no documentation to suggest theme parks HAVE to offer more than the accessibility of their lines. What the parks do above and beyond (DAS / AAP) seems to be by their choice, not because they have to. My fear is as more and more ask for accommodations for more and more reasons we might see a breaking point. For us it would mean UO is out of the question and Disney will mean more budgeting for
Genie+ which is inflexible and restrictive when dealing with "life issues".
I’m not sure it is a choice that will result in actual monetary gain, but at least I get the (potential) logic behind it now.
I highly doubt it will result in any gain at all in terms of ticket sales and park revenue. So not sure that would be a wise thought process if that is their reasoning. I have to think they have other reasons.
Universal has it's own market, it is more of an amusement park that is highly themed, more in line with a Six Flags market. It's not known for shows and entertainment like Disney and Dollywood. It's not a family style park that is friendly to all ages and desires like Disney and Dollywood. It doesn't have a balanced range of fun at the thrill end and at the non-rider end like SeaWorld and Busch Gardens. It is not a child focused park like Legoland and Sesame Place. Amusement/Theme parks vary greatly on what they offer and the demographics they appeal to.
This isn't like
Royal Caribbean becoming Autism Certified so they can draw passengers from other equal product lines. Being certified (if they are even doing it) doesn't mean young families with children with high needs are going to now go - there likely isn't a lot of attractions they would go on to make the visit worth it. And families with older children & adults who would ride are likely already going if theme parks are their thing. Time will tell what their purpose is in engaging this company but right now I don't think it is obvious.