Carly_Roach
Carly Roach
- Joined
- Jan 12, 2007
- Messages
- 3,353
Because if they don't file a grievance it sets a precidence that they're accepting of alternative methods the city has allowed for work being done by others rather than the 39 union members who were laid off. It's a formal protest.I don't see where the grievance is?
It is not like the city wen out and hired the boy to do the job. The city laid of 39 workers because they probably don't have the money to pay them. A boy comes along and volunteers to take care of something that has been neglected for years it seems (possibly due to funding?). If the city paid the kid to do the job, I could see the complaint. The city had no money to keep the worker's on the payroll, and no money was sent out for this job to be done.
Another thing has occurred to me: while what the Boy Scout did is nice, there's nothing in place for maintaining the work done for years into the future. He built a path, he gets his badge, and then he moves on. There's no workers in place to maintain that path or keep it safe and walkable.