fairestoneofall
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2007
- Messages
- 4,779
both my kids love it! they are 6 and 9, but we've been going for several years.
There are two sides to mission space. A quesy motion one, that I don't recommend to anyone and a gentle less intense fun one. Pick the green side...orange is for those looking to loose their lunch![]()
Are you sure you want to skip all of this?
. Guidebooks are great, but DIS reports are the best.But you have to take into account that as we grow older, we lose our ability to handle motion sickness as much as we could when we were younger. Little kids who sit in the back seats of cars with limited views out the windows are far better equipped to handle motion than adults who almost always sit in the front seat of cars and look straight ahead. As time goes by, our ability to handle motion suffers. So don't be surprised if the 7 year-olds can handle the "motion side" just fine. Of course, someone has to take them on the ride. And that won't be me!
Nope, not sure at all, which is what prompted this thread. I'm just not as familiar with Epcot. Last time I was at Disney was 20 years ago, right about the time *MGM* opened. So that was the big thing then. Epcot, admittedly, got short shrift that trip. My lack of Epcot experience combined with trying to guess what the kids will like is what's got me. Guidebooks are great, but DIS reports are the best.
I've heard that Mission: Space is pretty much-inducing. Is that accurate? I see it mentioned on touringplans.com
worship
, but I'm not convinced I'll let the kids give it a go.
I can ride the biggest baddest roller coaster you can imagine and feel fantastic. Put me on the teacups or a carousel or anything that spins and I'm done for at least a day.
It depends. My girls LOVE the orange side. They can ride a few times in a row before feeling the effects. DH won't ever do it because he gets sick on the tea cups and I've done it once but never again! It was terrifyingly real and I made the mistake of closing my eyes for a second (they tell you NOT to do that!) so I couldn't get my center back again and all I could feel was the spinning. I was sick for the rest of the day.
Thankfully I just send the kids on together while Dh and I wait in the play area at the end of the ride.
Back to Illuminations for a moment...
We've got 6:45p reservations at Rose and Crown for 10 people. Our hope was that we could see Illuminations from there or at least from the viewing platform. Let's say we're done eating between 8 and 8:30. Are we SOL for Illuminations in terms of viewing options? In other words, to far from 9p to hang around but too close to 9p to get a good viewing spot?
If you continue to order drinks and or food I don't see a problem. To not be eating or drinking and just taking up space, especially as a party of 10 is probably nit a very nice thing to do. There are people waiting for the table.
And honestly, if you just step out of the restaurant and take a seat next to it, the view is the same. I can't see a good reason to hold other people up.

She loves to go through all the shops
7. I guess I need to change this thread's topic to "Is two full days at Epcot enough for my
7?"Game, set, match for my7. I guess I need to change this thread's topic to "Is two full days at Epcot enough for my
7?"
We'll be at WDW for 6 days in June and I'm trying to plan our time. Epcot has me at a bit of a loss. It doesn't SEEM like there is enough there to keep two 7 year olds interested for a full day, but I can't shake the feeling that I'm being naive. I know we'll want to do Soarin, Test Track, and Turtle Talk. We'll also want to hit World Showcase, but I don't know how long we'll be able to hang out there before the kids get bored (assuming they will?). We've got dinner ressies at Rose and Garden at 6:45 in hopes of catching Illuminations. What I'm trying to decide is whether or not we should hit Epcot early in the morning and stay all day or maybe hit MK for a couple of hours and then hit Epcot, maybe after lunch?![]()