vacationer1954
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2010
- Messages
- 2,117
And saying it doesn't make it so doesn't make it not so. We have contrary opinions. I can respect that.You keep saying that. But it doesn't make it so.
And saying it doesn't make it so doesn't make it not so. We have contrary opinions. I can respect that.You keep saying that. But it doesn't make it so.
I spend enough time as it is planning FP for just three of us with simple and shared interests; I can't imagine having to do it for a party of 10 with assorted ages and interests.
I agree. I think guests who managed to book airline travel, who book hotels and who figure out how to stay fed have no problem with FP+.
Do you believe the previous system was unfair?I'm saying it is fair and good to change things to allow more people to get FP+ for attractions in advance.
I remember telling my mother that. When I invited to come with us, my brothers and all the kids, she jumped at the idea and then started placing conditions on Disney. No long lines. No expensive food. No burning sunshine. No very loud movie presentations. We eventually decided together that she would have a great time sharing breakfast and dinner with us, which we cooked together as a family in our timeshare, and then relaxing by the pool at the resort while the rest of us went to the parks and struggled through all these terrible things. It was great. The little ones would be so happy to rush back to the timeshare to tell Grandma about all the wonderful things they did during the day.
That is the first time I've ever seen a compliment for Disney IT on these boards. Bravo Disney IT, you are turning it around.
Considering we get to see these grandparents at most twice a year, I know everyone treasured the park days we all enjoyed together. I feel that moving toward a ride appointment system doesn't take into account the million unique reasons why guests need flexibility day to day and hour to hour, whether its health reasons, weather, toddler meltdowns and other unpredictable kid behavior, accommodating different interests within the group, or relatives who refuse to make plans a month or two ahead. It's something that sounds good on paper but doesn't work for many people in the real world.
If there is any insult it is the insinuation you and others are making that Disney guests cannot figure out how to reserve FP+s.Insulting, indeed.
Neither system is unfair. Some people like one better. Some people like the other better.Do you believe the previous system was unfair?
Neither system is unfair. Some people like one better. Some people like the other better.
Both systems are fair because Disney makes the rules and so whatever they put in place is by definition fair. I do think it is better for everyone to have a reasonable shot at their first ride before others get in front of them to take their second ride on a day. That is another kind of fairness. But whatever rules Disney decides on is fair. I'm not going to complain about how Disney refusing to change to a standby-less system is "unfair" or anything like that.Okay. I guess I just didn't understand the point of bringing up one system being fair if you thought both were. And I got the impression you didn't think the original was fair due to your comment about how everyone should have "firsts" before other people get to have "seconds".
If there is any insult it is the insinuation you and others are making that Disney guests cannot figure out how to reserve FP+s.
If there is any insult it is the insinuation you and others are making that Disney guests cannot figure out how to reserve FP+s.
I know the feeling. I didn't say or insinuate what others claimed I did either. I said people can do things and instead people claimed I said people couldn't do things and for nasty reasons none of which I said.I've never said or insinuated any such thing.
Every system has flaws even a 100% standby system.Disney's flawed FP+ system is responsible for people not being able to get them
And that's fine. I'm hoping that Disney feels more people see things my way and I respect the fact that you hope that Disney feels more people see things your way.It does take several steps, and isn't super user friendly. You may think it is, but many would disagree.
I agree. I think guests who managed to book airline travel, who book hotels and who figure out how to stay fed have no problem with FP+.
I manage to book airline travel and hotels, and feed myself quite well. I have an analytic mind, I've been a computer programmer for 35 years. I have a genius level IQ, if I say so myself. Yet trying to plan FP+ for myself and my friend for a trip last May almost drove me to tears. Trying to plan a trip down to the minute, months in advance, for a couple people who have medical problems that can radically change our ability to use the parks on a moment's notice, is about impossible.
I figured we could manage by going to the parks at off-peak times, and making liberal use of standby. But if all or most of the rides go to FP+ only, I don't think we'll be able to continue going to Disney at all, and I don't think we'll be the only ones.
And this is in addition to the PR disaster Disney brought on themselves by taking away standby without notice for those several days.
Can you imagine the marketing they would have to do before going to a reservation only system? I'm only quoting you because the above sentence suddenly brought that thought to my mind.
Holy smokes. Apologies if anyone mentioned it earlier.