rentayenta
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Feb 28, 2007
- Messages
- 27,424
No matter what, I can't imagine the THV bus system being any worse than the POR!
If I can survive that, I can survive anything. 


There will be shuttle service from THV to SSR Springs and also to Grandstand.
The boat will stop at THV and at SSR and DD.
Sounds like chaos to me but maybe it will be ok, I would definitely want a car if staying in the Treehouses.
Sammie, any idea why they are going to both the Springs and Grandstand?
I just see having to transfer buses at the end of a long day, lugging a couple of kids along, as a big drawback at staying at the THV. I think I would only stay there if I had my own car to go to and from the parks.
I'm going to be interested in hearing how things actually work out.
When we stayed at SSR in April, The Springs bus stop was always one of the busiest. If the THV internal bus drops more guests off there, that's gonna be one congested bus stop!
I'm sure the powers-that-be will fix any problems once they have a chance to monitor how the bus system is working out.![]()
The thing is, it shouldn’t be. A deluxe resort should have a deluxe standard of transportation. The fact that a part of the resort is a logistical challenge to Disney shouldn't change that. While I don't want to see my maintenance fees sky rocket, I just don't think it's acceptable that a better transportation model for the whole SSR resort can't be found.Relying on Disney Transportation will be a foolish idea.
I'm not necessarily closed minded. We'll find a way to make whatever is offered work. However, I think there should be a distinction in the level of service (for all services) at a deluxe resort over those at a resort where the average guest is paying $50 - $150 per night for a campsite/hookup. This puts Fort wilderness squarely in the value category. SSR is certainly not a value resort.fla4fun said:In a way, this sounds pretty much like how FW has operated for years - having to catch internal transportation to go to a hub, then external transportation to the parks from the hub. Some people love it, some people hate it to the point they drive their own cars everywhere - but it's worked just fine to get people where they need to go. People have been taking the boat from MK or a bus from Epcot, then catching a FW bus to their cabin/campsite for years - tired kids and all. I think people need to just keep an open mind and see what happens once it's open.
The thing is, it shouldnt be. A deluxe resort should have a deluxe standard of transportation. The fact that a part of the resort is a logistical challenge to Disney shouldn't change that. While I don't want to see my maintenance fees sky rocket, I just don't think it's acceptable that a better transportation model for the whole SSR resort can't be found.
IMHO, stopping at 7 stops instead of 5 wouldnt be a big deal if the buses came more frequently (and more reliably).
I'm not necessarily closed minded. We'll find a way to make whatever is offered work. However, I think there should be a distinction in the level of service (for all services) at a deluxe resort over those at a resort where the average guest is paying $50 - $150 per night for a campsite/hookup. This puts Fort wilderness squarely in the value category. SSR is certainly not a value resort.
The tree house villa section of SSR is also not a value alternative within the resort for those who are willing to accept a lower standard for a lower price. If Disney means it to be, perhaps the points charts should reflect that.
The thing is, it shouldnt be. A deluxe resort should have a deluxe standard of transportation. The fact that a part of the resort is a logistical challenge to Disney shouldn't change that. While I don't want to see my maintenance fees sky rocket, I just don't think it's acceptable that a better transportation model for the whole SSR resort can't be found.
IMHO, stopping at 7 stops instead of 5 wouldnt be a big deal if the buses came more frequently (and more reliably).
I'm not necessarily closed minded. We'll find a way to make whatever is offered work. However, I think there should be a distinction in the level of service (for all services) at a deluxe resort over those at a resort where the average guest is paying $50 - $150 per night for a campsite/hookup. This puts Fort wilderness squarely in the value category. SSR is certainly not a value resort.
The tree house villa section of SSR is also not a value alternative within the resort for those who are willing to accept a lower standard for a lower price. If Disney means it to be, perhaps the points charts should reflect that.
I think it is a bit premature to say not having a car at THV is a foolish idea. Lets see how transportation works first.I have been saying this for months and I'll re-iterate it again: IF YOU ARE STAYING AT THE TREE HOUSE VILLAS YOU NEED TO HAVE A CAR!!!! Relying on Disney Transportation will be a foolish idea.
I think it is a bit premature to say not having a car at THV is a foolish idea. Lets see how transportation works first.
Ok am the only one that thinks that light fixture in the tub/shower is dangerous, is water from the shower not going to get into that? I have never seen a hanging fixture on the back wall of a tub/shower.
Also I think if they bus everyone from there to the SSR, that is just ridiculous, who makes these decisions.![]()
IF YOU ARE STAYING AT THE TREE HOUSE VILLAS YOU NEED TO HAVE A CAR!!!! Relying on Disney Transportation will be a foolish idea.
Even if the bus service is THV is improved, I still say you're going to want to use a car.
Is that based on actual observations since the soft opening started, or on the conflicting reports folks were getting when talking to Member Services?
Where are you seeing these pictures?
I know it's kind of a strange concept for some - but I actually enjoy walking!
Especially at WDW - it's my favourite way to neutralize those lo-calorietreats I so much enjoy while on vacation.
![]()
![]()
You are speaking my language!