noodleknitter said:Your reason was arbitrary (70 years old) so was mine (poor writing skills.) Advanced age does not mean a person is unable to drive.
It's very easy for a teenager, or someone in their twenties, to say that 70 is too old to be driving. As someone in her 50s, with a DH who just turned 60, 70 doesn't seem all that old anymore!
No way will DH be ready to stop driving in 10 years....UNLESS something happens before then to incapacitate him.
That being said, I made my mother stop driving at age 80, after she broke her hip. She never gained full mobility in that leg (her right) and I felt that she would definitely be one of those "hit the wrong pedal" drivers. It's not that all of them actually hit the wrong pedal, but they lift the right foot, and THINK they've shifted it over to the brake, but because of limited flexibility, it just goes back down on the gas. I'm always frightened when I see elderly people who can barely lift their feet to walk (like my mother) get into a car and drive off.
As to the OP, I also feel that incarceration in a nursing type facility with no car would serve him better. Perhaps they could give him some sort of community service there? I wouldn't be so much concerned with depriving him of his freedom, but would be concerned about his becoming a victim of younger prisoners.
I guess it's the punishment vs protecting society question. Do we just want to punish him, or do we want to protect society from his repeating his actions? If the first, lock him up. If the second, take away his car, and put him someplace where he can't get another.
But as our society ages, we MUST find some way to provide the elderly with efficient transportation and/or living arrangements so that they will not feel that they must drive themselves.
He had a VERY REASONABLE amount of time to stop... I agree with everyone who said that there should be a vision and mobility test for the elderly drivers.