RadioFanatic
Mouseketeer<br><font color=6d6b70>SO not a jewelry
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2005
- Messages
- 4,410
C. Ann, no, I don't find that acceptable either.
And all the arguments for and against EIC in general are just that -- arguing about a tax law, not the people who receive or don't receive those benefits.
Bob Slydell said:With the exception of the OP, I haven't seen anyone "degrading" people who receive EIC.And all the arguments for and against EIC in general are just that -- arguing about a tax law, not the people who receive or don't receive those benefits.
And calling EIC a welfare payment is not a denegration of anyone -- it's a fact. EIC is a welfare payment -- take the terminology however you might want to. I don't think anyone stated that welfare was a derogatory term.![]()
dvcgirl said:But it really isn't a welfare payment. Look at earnings as a bell curve....from say...1,000 a year in income right on up to say...125,000 a year. Those making roughly 35K a year or less, well, for their income they are paying too high a percentage into SS and Medicare. And so someone making whatever the mimimum is to qualify....gets the largest "refund" of that percentage back. They paid too much in for what they make. 35k to 90K is taken as a percentage of what they earn. Once you get above 90K, well, we've paid our full share and the government is never going to be able to give all of that SS and Medicare back...and our burden is over.
dvcgirl said:But it really isn't a welfare payment. Look at earnings as a bell curve....from say...1,000 a year in income right on up to say...125,000 a year. Those making roughly 35K a year or less, well, for their income they are paying too high a percentage into SS and Medicare. And so someone making whatever the mimimum is to qualify....gets the largest "refund" of that percentage back. They paid too much in for what they make. 35k to 90K is taken as a percentage of what they earn. Once you get above 90K, well, we've paid our full share and the government is never going to be able to give all of that SS and Medicare back...and our burden is over.
.
QUOTE]
When those people paying "too high a percentage" into SS and Medicare now retire, they will receive monthly/health benefits based on today's contributions based on a percentage of their income, NOT their income after the IEC. So in effect, they will be getting back far more than they put in, and are also getting money back now.
Bob Slydell said:I agree in terms of those who are receiving EIC to balance out their percentage of what they've paid of SS/Medicare taxes, but when EIC (and other credits) creates a situation where a taxpayer receives a refund that's greater than the amount of taxes they've paid in, that's a welfare payment.
. Welfare is for people who are not working. The EIC is only for people who are working. Again, is it 100% fair, well, obviously lots of people have a problem with it. And to be honest, I guess that I would too if I was right over the cut-off earnings-wise. Objectively, they have to pick someplace to cut the EIC, and I suppose that roughly 10K under the median US household income seemed to be the chosen sweet spot. C.Ann said:-----------------------------
If you haven't degraded anyone, that's great - but that certainly isn't the history of the EIC threads that have been on this board before..
As for how one spends their money, as long as it's obtained legally, it's really no ones business.. Often you will see people post on here about numerous trips to Disney, long stays at the deluxe resorts, expensive gas-guzzling cars and then those very same people are looking for ways to "hide" money or "shift" money so their children can get tuition and grants to pay for a good portion of their college educations at some of the best colleges in the country.. That seems to be perfectly acceptable though - doesn't it?![]()
dvcgirl said:Well, I guess we're going to have to agree to disagree on this. Welfare is for people who are not working. The EIC is only for people who are working. Again, is it 100% fair, well, obviously lots of people have a problem with it. And to be honest, I guess that I would too if I was right over the cut-off earnings-wise. Objectively, they have to pick someplace to cut the EIC, and I suppose that roughly 10K under the median US household income seemed to be the chosen sweet spot.
) is not just about those not working. And I don't think it's necessarily people just above the cut-off line who's upset, but rather people who are not happy with the tax system in place in general. 
Bob Slydell said:I guess we'll have to disagree then, specifically on the meaning of welfare. Traditional welfare is for those not working, but the concept of welfare (thanks phoresnuf) is not just about those not working. And I don't think it's necessarily people just above the cut-off line who's upset, but rather people who are not happy with the tax system in place in general.
![]()
Alicnwondrln said:there are always going to be people who cheat the system, or work within its limits to get things and then take advantage of it
theres nothing i can do about it, but if i am doing that I aint broadcasting it
C.Ann said:I do have a question though - for those who feel the need to use terms that degrade people who receive the EIC (and yet are receiving it themselves because they are military families or whatever) how are you going to spend your glorified welfare check?? Does it make you feel good to be referred to in that manner?
as would i and sometimes when you have nothing its hard to spend that money on things you want vs will need later i said it for years to my sisterdvcgirl said:That's a valid point Alic...I'd chalk it up mostly to immaturity.
-----------------------------------------BuckNaked said:I haven't seen anyone that was trying to degrade anyone, military or otherwise.
You seem to be confusing refunds due to excess withholding with EITC refunds, which are completely different animals.
C.Ann said:-----------------------------------------
No - I don't believe I am confused at all..
------------------------------BuckNaked said:Then why are you equating tax refunds due to overpayment with EITC refunds?
C.Ann said:Perhaps some of these people who are criticising so freely would do well to recall that phrase, "There but for the grace of God go I.." One never knows when life is going to throw them a curve ball and they're going to find themselves in the exact same position..