dis_or_dat
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Jan 20, 2016
- Messages
- 1,045
I'm so lazy I would have just put on regular hats. Amazing job!!!!
I'm so lazy I would have just put on regular hats. Amazing job!!!!
that's true! I can't wait to see IRL!
Honestly, if you did the laugh canister w/ lights and sound, microphone, googley eye, double eyelids, 3-D mouth w/ lips, puffy full size costume, foam horns, shoes converted into feet with toenails, all created to be put into suitcases for transportation and didn't do the proportional hats, I'd hardly call you lazy.But you can certainly call me crazy!
Thanks!
I did have one punk kid that I had to deal with. She was definitely old enough to know better. She kept asking for jokes. Then she tried to rip the mouth off my costume because she thought I was hiding candy in there. Then she punched the googley eye when asking what it was made of. Then she brought her mom over and told her she should play with my laugh canister and press the button and then she did. The whole thing was really sour. I get it, it'll happen. But man alive I spent a lot of time on these costumes for you to be a little rough on them. We don't even know each other. Some kids will be kids. G did get a small scratch on her eye when she was dancing and whacked the microphone into the eye. So I think we took some lessons home about the costumes. But as I told G in the car before the event, we prepared the best we could. Whatever happens happens. It's live theater now and we just roll with it.
First, the costumes look AMAZING! It's always disappointing to me when not everybody gets it, but at least most could appreciate the effort you put into them. And omg I can't even believe the punk kid! "Kids will be kids" maybe, but for a parent to not only let it go but join in?! *** is wrong with people?! I have zero patience for that type of behavior and would probably have gone off. Sorry you had to deal with that, but your attitude is spot on.
I'm sure at Disney not only will more people get it, but they will be more respectful. You both really do look like the real deal (even with the shorts).
Costumes look amazing! Your hat looks like it's the hardest thing to wear. Are you planning to run in that?
Those costumes turned out phenomenally well! I would have been very frustrated with both that kid and the mother.
I also get the stress of trying to cram too much into a day.
Those costumes are unbelievable!
These costumes are amazing. I don't know how you had time to train, build costumes, and post all at once. I don't think I would have had time left to eat and sleep LOL
Great job!
Can you imagine TSA going through your luggage for a random spot check and seeing a Mike Wazowski face looking up at them?![]()
I was looking at your 15-s uphill intervals, and the GAP paces all make sense - that is, the GAP is faster than your actual pace. Have you noticed any wonkiness in this?
I'm asking because I had issues with my 15-s sprint trail uphills. I was doing 15-s sprint uphill with 90-s walk recovery. My easy warm-up involved running down to the bottom of the hill, and then I wanted to sprint up, walk partway back, sprint up, walk partway back, etc. so that I finished the last sprint at/near the top of the hill. This hill was pretty steep with a grade of 10% plus or minus a few since it wasn't a consistent grade.
To do this, I would sprint uphill for the 15-s and then when the interval buzzed completion, I would immediately turn around and walk downhill for 60 s and then turn around and walk uphill for 30 s until the next sprint interval. But I think that the GPS (?) got confused about when I was going uphill vs downhill and so some of my GAPs are slower than my actual pace. Of course, this doesn't make any sense. Here's an example (actual, then GAP):
You can see how intervals 1, 4, 5, 6, 8 don't make sense. Probably the other intervals are also affected but not enough to make them go opposite from expectations, but interval 2 is a huge GAP, while interval 9 is not so much, for example. Have you run into this sort of thing?
- 11:04, 11:45
- 10:33, 8:59
- 11:04, 10:17
- 10:14, 10:56
- 9:48, 10:36
- 11:06, 11:39
- 9:35, 9:03
- 10:32, 11:34
- 10:54, 10:49
- 11:31, 11:23
- 11:30, 10:15
- 10:08, 9:32
- 10:35, 9:47
- 10:31, 9:24
My Epix has dual-band GPS, which I was hoping would help out with this sort of thing, but apparently not enough. The trail is wooded, so maybe that interferes with the GPS too much.
In the end, it's not hugely important because I'm not going for a pace goal, just sprint, but it would be satisfying to figure out.
I'm thinking some or all of these possibilities:
I'm curious what you think about this.
- The watch isn't catching my turns correctly - for example, when I'm walking and turn to start walking uphill again, it is not getting that.
- The watch isn't measuring the elevation gain of each segment correctly. I believe it just uses a barometer for the elevation so that could be off. I can enable corrections to the elevation in the web app, but I don't think that changes the individual interval GAPs.
- Hmmm, I thought I had another possible issue, but can't remember it.
Which data? The elevation graph?Can you screenshot the actual data? When I’ve had something like this occur it’s because Strava wasn’t getting the elevation data correctly. So instead of seeing a gain of 10 feet in the 15s rep it saw 0ft or a negative. It happens less often on longer reps for me. Even then I’ve seen ebb and flow despite it being the exact same mile to mile point on longer ones too.
Which data? The elevation graph?
I should say that this is not with Strava. This is through Garmin. The Epix enables GAP calculations. So the data that I have is via Garmin Connect on my phone or the website.
I think that in order to get GAP now in Strava, you have to have a premium membership, which I won't pay for.