hrh_disney_queen
<font color=red>My DH has the hots for Stacey<br><
- Joined
- May 17, 2004
- Messages
- 11,595
Originally posted by DisneyVillain
If you are thrown from the car, it was already WAY out of control. There is no chance to recover a vehicle that is out of control enough to eject the driver.
While it seems logical that an unbelted driver would be more likely to lose control, I have never seen any evidence to that effect. It may be that by the time a seatbelt can make a difference, the car is already unrecoverable. I am sure that if a study comes out that shows that seatbelts improve the chance of maintaining control, it will get a lot of press coverage. Until such evidence is presented, the control argument is specious.
My personal belief is that government should protect us from each other, but not from ourselves.
And nobody rides in my car without a seatbelt.
I DO see seatbelt laws as a way of "government protecting us from each other".
What if the accident isn't enough to eject the driver, but tosses him/her across the seat? I still believe that having a driver in a moving car is better than NOT having a driver. I don't think that all accidents causing an unbelted driver to change positions in the car (or out of the car, for that matter) are unrecoverable, and I dont' see how anyone could assume that they are.
I know that some people are against government intervention at all costs, but when it is more that just the one person's life at stake, it is necessary to have laws.