Timing is everything, isn't it? (political thread)

Originally posted by MICKEY88
oops...correction...

The McVeigh defense team uncovered evidence that indicated Terry Nichols might have received bomb making expertise from Al Qaeda explosives experts based in the Philippines.

We know that this small-time Kansas farmer of modest means took expensive and unexplained trips to the Philippines, many times without his Filipino mail order bride. The court record reveals the Oklahoma City bomber was in Cebu City in December 1994 at the same time as the mastermind of the first World Trade Center attack, Ramzi Yousef.

Did these two men cross paths? According to the sworn statement of the co-founder of the Muslim terrorist group Abu Sayyaf, which is a spin-off organization of Al Qaeda, Terry Nichols and Ramzi Yousef met personally to discuss bomb making in the early 1990's.

Mickey,
I went to read the article. The author is a journalist, Jana something. It is just her theory, hardly a fact. They have a message board over their,and some people stated their views on it, very interesting.
 
Originally posted by dmadman43
Again, I asked, outside of McVeigh (which I would contend is a random act) how many terrorists plotting and commiting acts of violence against the US have not been "Arab looking" compared to those that are?

what's the current murder rate in NYC? Los Angeles? chicago? the current rate for assault? rape?

ture, we suffered a considerable loss on 9/11, but we suffer violence in our midst every day -- and the losses are ultimately more severe than what we sustained from 9/11.

that's not to disparage the losses -- or the risk of future losses -- but really... :rolleyes:
 
Originally posted by minniepumpernickel
Mickey,
I went to read the article. The author is a journalist, Jana something. It is just her theory, hardly a fact. They have a message board over their,and some people stated their views on it, very interesting.

she claims to have witnesses,,it's not just a theory..the courts ruled in her favor when the guy sued her,,basing her info as fact.....

perhaps you need to read the story more carefully
 
Originally posted by Briar Rose 7457
what's the current murder rate in NYC? Los Angeles? chicago? the current rate for assault? rape?

ture, we suffered a considerable loss on 9/11, but we suffer violence in our midst every day -- and the losses are ultimately more severe than what we sustained from 9/11.

that's not to disparage the losses -- or the risk of future losses -- but really... :rolleyes:

what does the homicide rate have to do with a group of people who's sole purpose is to attack our government,


so are you saying we should let terrorists go, just because we have some nut cases that kill in the US....
 

Regarding McVeigh and the OKC bombing...

http://www.jaynadavis.com/fox_jg1.html

THE BIG STORY WITH JOHN GIBSON
June 20, 2002
HEADLINE: Interview With Jayna Davis

GIBSON: Documents obtained by The Associated Press show that our government was warned that Islamic terrorists were planning attacks on American federal buildings around the time of the Oklahoma City bombing. The Clinton administration even stepped up security around such buildings.

So could this mean that Timothy McVeigh was acting in league with those
militants? My next guest says, yes, indeed.

Jayna Davis is a former Oklahoma City television reporter. She joins us now from Oklahoma City.

So, Jayna, this warning that was issued in February of 1995, a -- essentially
a couple of months before the Murrah building explosion -- do you think it was connected to that bombing?

JAYNA DAVIS, FORMER OKLAHOMA CITY TV REPORTER: Well, it dovetails with the information that we generated when I was working as a reporter for the NBC affiliate here in Oklahoma City, and we gathered information from 24 witnesses who identified eight Middle Eastern men, the majority of whom were of Iraqi descend, working in collusion with Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols during various stages of the bombing plot to blow up the Murrah building.

The warning you refer to, John, I have in my possession. It was issued by the Congressional Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, and what -- why it's startling to me is because it stated in February of 1995 that there would be an Iran-sponsored Islamic attack on U.S. soil. This specific target was Washington, D.C., primarily Congress and the White House.

Once security was beefed up after the dissemination of this warning, then there was an updated warning that was then issued by the director of the Congressional Task Force, Mr. Yossef Bodansky. He stated in the updated warning the specific language that the terrorists planned to strike at the heart of the U.S. but not acting alone.

The Islamic terrorists were going to employ the services and recruit what they call two lily whites. And in the jargon of the intelligence community, lily whites means anybody that's not connected or ostensibly connected to any Middle Eastern terrorist organizations and they have no police record, they're clean, they wouldn't be flagged by any law- enforcement agencies. Both Terry Nichols and Timothy McVeigh fit that criterion.

GIBSON: Now, Jayna, you have long held that a character named Hussain
Al-Hussaini is John Doe #2, and I think we have pictures of him here. This is Hussain Hasham Al-Hussaini, and then, of course, we'll see the picture of John Doe #2, and he does bear a resemblance to him. What evidence do you have that Hussain Al-Hussaini, an Iraqi, was with Tim McVeigh?

DAVIS: Well, let's start with four days before the bombing. Two witnesses who independently identified him out of a photo line-up of 35 photographs of eight different Middle Eastern men. These witnesses identified him independently of each other as drinking beer with Timothy McVeigh in a tavern in Oklahoma City on April 15th of 1995.

Then there were two more witnesses that identified him jogging outside the
Murrah building, dressed in blue jeans with a backpack and a windbreaker, racing from the Murrah building, one block east of the building, timing his run, before daybreak, the day of April 19th. These witnesses walked past this individual they saw running within about three to four feet and looked him square in the face. He was positively identified...

GIBSON: Where is Hussain Al-Hussaini?

DAVIS: Well, we don't know. I do know that he went and moved to Boston sometime around 1997 and claimed that he was working at Boston International Airport...

GIBSON: Logan?

DAVIS: ... in '97 and '98. Logan. Yes.

GIBSON: And he was an Iraqi soldier?

DAVIS: It's also important to note, John, he was identified in the Ryder truck with McVeigh 30 minutes prior to the bombing when McVeigh stopped to ask for directions at 10th and Hudson, which is about five blocks north of the Murrah building.

He was also identified at ground zero stepping out of the Ryder truck. He was identified in the passenger seat -- I'm sorry -- in the driver's seat of a brown Chevrolet pickup speeding away from the bomb site 60 seconds after the blast in a truck that matched the description of the official FBI all-points bulletin issued the morning of the bombing for Middle Eastern terrorists.

If you've never seen these articles, I urge you to read them, especially the Wall Street Journal ones. (They were too long to post, I picked this one because it was relatively short.)

I'm a believer that Mcveigh and Nichols are not the ONLY people responsible for OKC.

Also, in another article with Lou Dobbs from CNN, Hussein al-Husseini is revealed to have been stationed at Salman Pak which has long been suspected as the heart of terrorist training in Iraq.
 
Originally posted by MICKEY88
she claims to have witnesses,,it's not just a theory..the courts ruled in her favor when the guy sued her,,basing her info as fact.....

perhaps you need to read the story more carefully

Well Mickey, I'll be keeping my eyes glued to the news reports, as always.;) It should be interesting to watch Jayna, the broadcast journalists, interview. I never say for sure about any news item, just when I've read one article. Tell me how the book is? Have you read it yet? Perhaps you should do that first!:D
 
Originally posted by minniepumpernickel
Well Mickey, I'll be keeping my eyes glued to the news reports, as always.;) It should be interesting to watch Jayna, the broadcast journalists, interview. I never say for sure about any news item, just when I've read one article. Tell me how the book is? Have you read it yet? Perhaps you should do that first!:D

but you did say for sure...you said it was just her theory..even though courts ruled her info as factual...
 
Originally posted by jrydberg
Actually, it amounts to substantially more than that. He has essentially signed up to take up arms against the United States of America. As such it really isn't that difficult to see how he could be considered a non-uniformed "enemy combatant"... You may disagree with how such situations are being handled, but clearly this is more than a simple attempted murder case.

Taking up arms against one's country IS the definition of treason under Article III Section III of the Constitution.

http://www.usconstitution.net/const.html

So, yes, even though the Founding Fathers were not familiar with Al-Qaeda, they did provide for people like Jose Padilla in the Constitution.
 
Originally posted by MICKEY88
you would trust this man to run our military/ country.. if he let's something that simple upset him to the point that he acts that way in front of children... a mature MAN in control of himself would just laugh it off,,,not act childish about it..

I'd trust a man like Kerry, who gets upset when people question his patriotism, than a man like Bush who stood by while Sampley savaged John McCain in South Carolina.

Sorry, questioning a person's patriotism is not a laughing matter.
 
Originally posted by treesinger
Regarding McVeigh and the OKC bombing...

http://www.jaynadavis.com/fox_jg1.html
I'm a believer that Mcveigh and Nichols are not the ONLY people responsible for OKC.

There were many eyewitness who saw McVeigh with another man who seemed to be in charge. 60 Minutes did a great story on that. In addition, whatever happened to "John Doe # 2"?
 
Originally posted by ThAnswr
I'd trust a man like Kerry, who gets upset when people question his patriotism, than a man like Bush who stood by while Sampley savaged John McCain in South Carolina.

Sorry, questioning a person's patriotism is not a laughing matter.

Well, I for one am not questioning his patriotism. Afterall, he did serve in Vietnam I believe. I heard that somewhere. Is that true? Has anyone else heard that before? (Of course, so did Ho Chi Mihn, so I really don't understand that point). Anyway, I question his mental stability, along with McCains.

And as for what happened to McCain in SC, well here's another candidate they whithered under the pressure. Presidential politics is hell. I think Clinton taught us all that.
 
Originally posted by Briar Rose 7457
what's the current murder rate in NYC? Los Angeles? chicago? the current rate for assault? rape?

ture, we suffered a considerable loss on 9/11, but we suffer violence in our midst every day -- and the losses are ultimately more severe than what we sustained from 9/11.

that's not to disparage the losses -- or the risk of future losses -- but really... :rolleyes:

I don't understand the point you are trying to make. Again, certainly all Muslims or "arab looking" people are not terrorists, but the perponderance of terrorists that have sworn to kill Westerners and attack the US in particular are Arab looking. A cursory view of the FBI Most Wanted Terrorists Fugitives shows that most of them are Arab looking. http://www.fbi.gov/mostwant/terrorists/fugitives.htm

So, what types of people would you be looking out for? Everybody?
 
Originally posted by minniepumpernickel
I read about a guy, ex-marine who fired at people from on top of a tower in the sixties. He killed quite a few. He was white.

Are you including mass murderers, and cult leaders, in your definition?

Okay. Not sure I get the correlation. But, if you want to go with that, it's 19+ vs 4
 
Originally posted by ThAnswr
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by ThAnswr
We've got a chance to right the wrongs on election day.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------




Geeez, I can't understand why Kerry got upset!

Btw, for those of you who don't know who Ted Sampley is, he's the same guy who accused John McCain of betraying veterans while Bush stood by in South Carolina.

Some standard bearer that Ted Sampley. LOL!

Does it MATTER who Ted Sampley is and what he does? I didn't see where he was running for any public office, let alone President of the United States. Flashing a tee shirt that says Hanoi John and expressing an opinion in front of school children does not constitute obscene speech or a gesture. Flipping the bird has one meaning and it is INCREDIBLY INAPPPROPRIATE behavior for any adult let alone a presidential candidate.
 
Originally posted by dmadman43
So, in the 20+ years of terrorism committed against this country, the best people can do that are against profile are McVeigh and Nichols? Other than perhaps the Unabomber, how many more examples of them are there? I got 19 Arabs in one day, plus a bunch more on the FBI's most wanted list. McVeigh and Nichols were anamolies. You'd have to admit that. I know profiling sounds mean and awful and what not, but hey.. again, I don't see too many blonde haired, blue eyed people advocating the death of Western Civilization.

Leave it to liberals to weed out and focus on the "exception" rather than the rule.
 
do a little cut and paste...delete the word "Arab" and substitute "communist"... welcome to the new McCarthyism. are there Arabs under YOUR bed?

for this we're willing to trample the constituttiion and sacrifice our civil liberties?
 
Originally posted by ThAnswr
I'd trust a man like Kerry, who gets upset when people question his patriotism, than a man like Bush who stood by while Sampley savaged John McCain in South Carolina.

Sorry, questioning a person's patriotism is not a laughing matter.

Bush showed maturity and self control..Kerry showed neither.

.if a man can control himself , it's not a question of whether questioning someone's patriotism is a laughing matter....one considers the source, and ignores it...
self control is a sign of maturity..the lack of such is not..
 
McCarthyism involved denying people jobs and such because of political viewpoints. Hardly comparable. I understand the point but hyperbole doesn't help.
 
Originally posted by Briar Rose 7457
do a little cut and paste...delete the word "Arab" and substitute "communist"... welcome to the new McCarthyism. are there Arabs under YOUR bed?

for this we're willing to trample the constituttiion and sacrifice our civil liberties?

different situation..with communists it was a fear of attack on US soil.....in this situation the attack occured..more than once remember the first bombing of world trade center..and it's a fact they plan to strike again.....

I doubt those who drafted the constitution are turning over in their graves, being the intelligent individuals that they were I think they would recognize the changing times call for changing measures, and also would not be so conceited as to believe that they had drafted a document that would be perfect for all time.. otherwise they would have made it unchangeable..

....what really bothers me is all the people complaining that the government is going too far...yet the same people bash the administration for not preventing 9-11...and will also bash the administration and our intel community if and when another attack occur....
 


Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE








DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top Bottom