I like some of the specials like a lot of the tornado specials, and when weather changed history
Absolutely... the more profitable channels generally go on the lower tiers -- the less profitable channels generally go on the higher tiers... until you get the premium tiers... those are pretty darned profitable as well.which depending on your provider means an additional cost to get that tier, to receive those channels.
I dont watch weather channel in the morning because the local news station weather girllove
is waaaaay cuter than al roker.
MTE! They are turning into MTV and VH1 which are no longer music channels.
Absolutely: So much is going to be changing over the next few years, in reaction to how we viewers are changing -- just like how things have changed over the last few years, in reaction to how we viewers have changed. I can tell you that even as an itty-bitty stockholder in a lot of the companies that bring us television, Internet access, and/or telephone service, I'm pretty disappointed by the performance of some of them, and as I get closer to retirement, I going to be getting a heck of a lot more punitive against those companies that fail to provide those healthy returns that I could get from other investments.So if I'm running NBC/Universal/Comcast, I have a channel that potentially could provide programming that would draw a much larger audience that will watch for more than 5 minutes and command much higher ad rates. I believe this is what happened to MTV. Actual programs are much more profitable than random music video clips which can be found on-line.
Absolutely: So much is going to be changing over the next few years, in reaction to how we viewers are changing -- just like how things have changed over the last few years, in reaction to how we viewers have changed. I can tell you that even as an itty-bitty stockholder in a lot of the companies that bring us television, Internet access, and/or telephone service, I'm pretty disappointed by the performance of some of them, and as I get closer to retirement, I going to be getting a heck of a lot more punitive against those companies that fail to provide those healthy returns that I could get from other investments.
Without a doubt... I would never suggest that it was popularity. Hulu is immensely popular, but mostly because it is free. Tack a reasonable price-tag on it and it plummets in popularity, to be comparable with other distribution mechanisms which have a reasonable price-tag applied (i.e., Netflix, Amazon Unbox, DVDs, etc.) It all comes down to what we viewers are willing to provide more incentive for providers to provide for us.Bicker, I agree with your assesment about stockholder input. I also agree about media's changing "face" for the most part, but will point out that it's not really overall popularity that drives these decisions.
Think about what makes an audience the "target". The marketplace isn't a one-viewer-one-vote democracy... it is a one-dollar-one-vote democracy.If the "target audience" (that is, the audience whose presence the advertisers most want) doesn't watch something, it really doesn't matter if lots of other non-targetted groups do watch it.