jcb
always emerging from hibernation
- Joined
- Apr 28, 2007
- Messages
- 4,641
I think this was mentioned on the podcast a couple of times. If not, I apologize for being off topic.
The Segway lawsuit is back. Originally dismissed in February (news story here), on Tuesday (5/13/08), a federal judge held the three individuals who had originally brought the lawsuit had amended their lawsuit enough to show that they have "standing" to bring it.
The first lawsuit was dismissed because none of the individuals alleged they were actually going to visit the parks. The individuals then amended their lawsuit to say they intend to visit the Parks at a specific point in time in the near future. (The decision doesn't say when.) It is pretty standard for a court to permit a party to amend a complaint that has been dismissed at the start of a lawsuit.
WDW also argued that the individuals had not adequately explained why WDW policy on segways at the theme parks is unreasonable. The judge refused to address this point at the present time but left it open for WDW to raise the issue again later.
The decision simply means the individual's complaint is sufficient to let them go forward with the lawsuit. It doesn't require WDW to permit seqways in the parks. The lawsuit will now proceed but WDW can ask for it to be dismissed at any time.
I should say I am not connected with the lawsuit in any way. Just curious.
The Segway lawsuit is back. Originally dismissed in February (news story here), on Tuesday (5/13/08), a federal judge held the three individuals who had originally brought the lawsuit had amended their lawsuit enough to show that they have "standing" to bring it.
The first lawsuit was dismissed because none of the individuals alleged they were actually going to visit the parks. The individuals then amended their lawsuit to say they intend to visit the Parks at a specific point in time in the near future. (The decision doesn't say when.) It is pretty standard for a court to permit a party to amend a complaint that has been dismissed at the start of a lawsuit.
WDW also argued that the individuals had not adequately explained why WDW policy on segways at the theme parks is unreasonable. The judge refused to address this point at the present time but left it open for WDW to raise the issue again later.
The decision simply means the individual's complaint is sufficient to let them go forward with the lawsuit. It doesn't require WDW to permit seqways in the parks. The lawsuit will now proceed but WDW can ask for it to be dismissed at any time.
I should say I am not connected with the lawsuit in any way. Just curious.