Mackenzie Click-Mickelson
Chugging along the path of life
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2015
- Messages
- 30,729
Eh you view that as such a horrible thing. Any worker who doesn't disclose charges would be a dishonest one. Does it mean they are doing it with malicious intent? No not necessarily and one shouldn't assume just by me describing it as that to mean that. But to charge a customer for "on the rocks" but not disclose what that charge is either verbally or on the menu is dishonest.I think it's a stretch to call the bartender dishonest. Not every transaction comes with a cost analysis. If I ask for something in a restaurant or bar (or anywhere) it's implied that I know I'll be charged. I'm making a purchase. I'd find it really irritating for the server or bartender to point out the price of everything I asked for.
As far as implied yeah well in this context that's exactly what happened to the OP, they implied (like many people would) that on the rocks meant ice, they were charged for it and wondered since when did ice become an additional charge. Wouldn't you assume if there are 3 different options for an upcharge for ice the person taking your order would ask you which one you want? I would think that and reasonably that would be implied. Do I want the sphere that is $4 or the tube that is $2? I'm sure if you were ordering you'd like that to be cleared up? Perhaps not. But regardless on their menu no $6 charge appears. I'm sure you and I reasonably would wonder where that came from.
but that wasn't the conversation. I'd find a $6 charge a big deal but probably not $1 or $2 someone else may not care no matter what and shrug whatever off even higher than $6.
Several family members were bartenders back in the day. I asked a friend who used to bartend on Miami and Ft Laud beaches back in the '80s/90s and he said "on the rocks" to him meant a shot with ice, served in a regular rocks glass vs a tinier shot glass....it didn't mean any extra liquor.