Gents-
I'm looking in to getting a trip together for my extended family and I'd like to glean some wisdom from your collectively considerable experience. Given the extremely attractive rates of some very nice rental homes in the area, I'm thinking of staying off-property next time. I know a lot of you are DVC owners and therefore rarely if ever stay off-site, but if you ever have stayed at a non-Disney property, what did you think? The main thing I'm thinking about is transportation. My research suggests that leaving a house and driving to a park will almost always take less time than relying on Disney(although I'd have to pay for parking), but what do you think? Is it an extra hassle to be responsible for your own transportation or is it a blessing to know that you won't have to face a huge bus/boat/monorail liine that makes several stops before getting to your destination.
My heart says go back to Disney, but my wallet says find a way to do it cheaper (hence, the rental home idea). If we were to stay on-site, I'd need to rent enough DVC points to get at least 3 rooms in either BWV or BLT. When you add up the costs, a rental home merits strong consideration. Then there's the issue of being away from the Disney atmosphere. I liked being right in the heart of it at BWV and I might miss it if I stayed off-site.
Also, this hypothetical trip would take place Oct 29 - Nov 5. That's during Food & Wine. I've never been there during that time. What does it do to the crowds at Epcot? I'm sure the crowds swell quite a bit, but are those folks going to impact the lines for the attractions or just clog up World Showcase?
Any input is appreciated.