The Bates Family (18 kids)


I am not convinced the kids are brianwashed either. If you had 19 kids in the house, you would have to have some pretty strict rules and expectations regarding behaviour or it would just be chaos. I have only 2 kids and sometimes my house is pretty chaotic!:upsidedow
 
When it comes down to it I really don't care what these families do. They seem like happy families who get along, which is more than I can say for a lot of families. Everyone has their right to an opinion on them and yes they do put themselves out there for people to judge, but I don't get why people get so worked up and to an extent angry about the way they live their lives everytime a thread about them pops up. Just like you have choosen to live your live your way, they have choosen to live their life their way. We know the Duggars don't use any goverment assistance and I have yet to see anything that says that the Bates family does so neither family affects my life in anyway and if they are happy that is great.
 
I don't really care what these families do or don't do for the most part. It does not affect me at all. However, I do find it a bit bothersome about all the rules about how the girls dress.

In one episode, a couple of the older Duggar girls were working with the local fire dept. and had issues because there wasn't a skirt option for the uniform. They get all wound up about modesty and apparently men cannot control themselves when they see a woman in pants or an above the ankle skirt. How about we expect that men learn a bit of self-control???

The girls ended up purchasing a pair of the uniform pants and creating a skirt. I just don't get it. Those pants were not supposed to look sexy, why are they a problem? Oh yeah, those men just won't be able to restrain themselves when they see a girl in those fabulous uniform pants.

Don't get me wrong, I am all for a reasonable amount of modesty. I have a teenage daughter and work in a middle school and am rather shocked at what some parents are ok with. Honestly, is there not a happy medium in there???

It's also about not wearing a man's garment. What I thought was ridiculous was the episode that they were all running a 5k, and the boys were out there in khakis and jeans. They explained that they didn't wear shorts to be modest, but seriously, have they never heard of jogging pants? The girls were wearing their usual long skirts, but there are such things as fitness skirts, too!
 
I don't really care what these families do or don't do for the most part. It does not affect me at all. However, I do find it a bit bothersome about all the rules about how the girls dress.

In one episode, a couple of the older Duggar girls were working with the local fire dept. and had issues because there wasn't a skirt option for the uniform. They get all wound up about modesty and apparently men cannot control themselves when they see a woman in pants or an above the ankle skirt. How about we expect that men learn a bit of self-control???

The girls ended up purchasing a pair of the uniform pants and creating a skirt. I just don't get it. Those pants were not supposed to look sexy, why are they a problem? Oh yeah, those men just won't be able to restrain themselves when they see a girl in those fabulous uniform pants.

Don't get me wrong, I am all for a reasonable amount of modesty. I have a teenage daughter and work in a middle school and am rather shocked at what some parents are ok with. Honestly, is there not a happy medium in there???

I agree, a bit over the top regarding the skirts versus pants -and I believe a false assumption on their part. Men are probably more likely to be turned on by a girl in a skirt than pants (especially unflattering uniform pants).
 

Wow, just wow!

Then we have a cult in my house and we brainwash our kids. I expect my 3 teenagers to tow the line, so to speak, if they want to keep their cell phones, have a social life, drive the car, etc. Heck, I've even been known to ask them to take turns saying grace before dinner (oh so cultish), attend church with the family....AND Sunday School.

My job is to prepare them to go out into the world, live out their faith, work for what they need and want and give back to others. I don't give them choices of other lifestyles. They may choose differently once they are on their own, but while in my home, they mind their parents and those in authority.

I don't think these families are encouraged to go out into the world to live their own lives. All the older kids must help out at home (the household couldn't function otherwise) and the girls do not leave until they are married. No one is seeking higher education or mingling with others who are of different backgrounds or faith, unless they are going as missionaries to spread their faith. I think they are expected to stay close to their parents for always, although both Michele and Jim were given freedom inter teen years to choose their own path. Their own kids don't seem to be given any freedom in this regard.
 
Okay just to be the Devil's Advocate (although perhaps a poor choice of words in context...) do you guys have a problem with Amish? Do they not also dress differently than others and by a strict code, have different beliefs and lifestyles than most, discourage interaction and especially marriage outside their own group, etc?
 
Okay just to be the Devil's Advocate (although perhaps a poor choice of words in context...) do you guys have a problem with Amish? Do they not also dress differently than others and by a strict code, have different beliefs and lifestyles than most, discourage interaction and especially marriage outside their own group, etc?

I think you bring up an interesting point. I don't have a problem with the Amish, but I am not seeing a reality show about them on TV either.

Aren't Amish teenagers allowed their "freedom year" as well? I believe they have an actual name for it. The teen is allowed to go out into the "English" world for a year and decide for themselves whether or not they want to stay with the Amish.

It might be interesting if the Duggar kids were allowed that freedom. Would they stick with how they were raised? or would they be tempted by worldly attitudes and ideas?



ETA - I looked it up and it's called Rumspringa and it is usually allowed at 16 and lasts for two years.
 
Where is it said that they aren't paying their hospital bills?

But how do you know he is using it for free and that he isn't being billed and then paying the bills?

I don't know either way myself, but I am not going to make an assumption either way just based on what he said on the program. All he said was that they don't have insurance however without insurance hospitals are required to treat them. He didn't say that they are required to treat them for free.

My line of thinking runs with the above..

Did he come right out and say, "Then when we get the bill we don't pay it.."??

Also, in tight-knit religious communities such as these it's not uncommon for there to be a fund that everyone pays into (similar to your offering each Sunday in whatever church you attend) and then when a family is in need - as in the bills are more than what they can pay in total - the remainder comes from that fund..

I wouldn't leap to such a conclusion without a lot more information - yet those types of leaps are fairly common here on the DIS in regards to government assistance; food stamps; EIC; etc.. It almost seems as though people derive some sort of extreme pleasure out of assuming the absolute worst about others before gathering facts to back up those assumptions..
 
I don't think these families are encouraged to go out into the world to live their own lives. All the older kids must help out at home (the household couldn't function otherwise) and the girls do not leave until they are married. No one is seeking higher education or mingling with others who are of different backgrounds or faith, unless they are going as missionaries to spread their faith. I think they are expected to stay close to their parents for always, although both Michele and Jim were given freedom inter teen years to choose their own path. Their own kids don't seem to be given any freedom in this regard.

Actually, they said one of the older girls was going to a community college (the brother was paying for her to attend). She also volunteered as an EMT. I am guessing she is running into all sorts of backgrounds and faith at college and while volunteering.
 
I think you bring up an interesting point. I don't have a problem with the Amish, but I am not seeing a reality show about them on TV either.

Aren't Amish teenagers allowed their "freedom year" as well? I believe they have an actual name for it. The teen is allowed to go out into the "English" world for a year and decide for themselves whether or not they want to stay with the Amish.

It might be interesting if the Duggar kids were allowed that freedom. Would they stick with how they were raised? or would they be tempted by worldly attitudes and ideas?



ETA - I looked it up and it's called Rumspringa and it is usually allowed at 16 and lasts for two years.

True! And FWIW I actually have a problem with "reality TV" in the first place, but that's a whole 'nother issue. :laughing:

For the rest, I honestly know very little about Amish, although yes I have heard of that practice. They were just the example that popped into my head that fit many of those same arguments but seem to be generally perceived in a more positive light (certainly not by everyone).

As far as sending your kids out into the world from 16-18...well, I wouldn't do it! Would you? Not that it matters, it's just a thought that occurs to me. I think the shock of being out in the world at 16 would be enough to send most young people scrambling back to safety (I know a few exceptions personally, but still...) and probably isn't really so much a testament to choosing one lifestyle over another as simply being too young to be out there in the big world in the first place. Of course that's my opinion, and my opinion on that probably has nothing to do with the subject at hand.

From my own observations in life, I've noticed that there are people from pretty much any/every way of life or religion of their upbringing who stick with it as adults, and others who do not. I know people who were raised within strict church environments or other kinds of lifestyles with rules or practices that might seem very "extreme," "different," "weird," or "cultish" to others, and who do not follow that way of life as adults. And, of course, others who do.

My point is that ultimately I think the Duggar children and the Bates children will choose for themselves. If they choose to live as they were raised, is that necessarily proof that they were brainwashed? I honestly don't think so, any more than is necessarily the case for any individual Catholic, Muslim, Mormon, etc etc etc.
 
It almost seems as though people derive some sort of extreme pleasure out of assuming the absolute worst about others before gathering facts to back up those assumptions..

It also seems like some people derive some sort of extreme pleasure out of only reading the first few posts.
 
I agree, a bit over the top regarding the skirts versus pants -and I believe a false assumption on their part. Men are probably more likely to be turned on by a girl in a skirt than pants (especially unflattering uniform pants).

The reason the girls won't wear pants even for sports is because pants shows the outline of their behind and front.
 
True! And FWIW I actually have a problem with "reality TV" in the first place, but that's a whole 'nother issue. :laughing:

For the rest, I honestly know very little about Amish, although yes I have heard of that practice. They were just the example that popped into my head that fit many of those same arguments but seem to be generally perceived in a more positive light (certainly not by everyone).

As far as sending your kids out into the world from 16-18...well, I wouldn't do it! Would you? Not that it matters, it's just a thought that occurs to me. I think the shock of being out in the world at 16 would be enough to send most young people scrambling back to safety (I know a few exceptions personally, but still...) and probably isn't really so much a testament to choosing one lifestyle over another as simply being too young to be out there in the big world in the first place. Of course that's my opinion, and my opinion on that probably has nothing to do with the subject at hand.

From my own observations in life, I've noticed that there are people from pretty much any/every way of life or religion of their upbringing who stick with it as adults, and others who do not. I know people who were raised within strict church environments or other kinds of lifestyles with rules or practices that might seem very "extreme," "different," "weird," or "cultish" to others, and who do not follow that way of life as adults. And, of course, others who do.

My point is that ultimately I think the Duggar children and the Bates children will choose for themselves. If they choose to live as they were raised, is that necessarily proof that they were brainwashed? I honestly don't think so, any more than is necessarily the case for any individual Catholic, Muslim, Mormon, etc etc etc.


Actually there is a reality show about the Amish and them sending their kids out in the world. I remember seeing one about a boy that was addicted to drugs. They followed him around for a while, I don't know the outcome but I remember watching it.

But as far as the duggers and the bates I just wish people would recognize that they are just raising their kids as they see fit just like everyone else in the world. Sure they have a tv show but so does a lot of other people.

You can have your opinions but at the end of the day those families are a very close tight knit loving family and no one is being abused. They are well taken care of and sure they have some extremes according to US but not them. This is their way of life and if they CHOSE to live this way and we are not affected by them b/c we aren't then let them live their life the way they want. Just like we are living our life the way we want.

I know that some will argue that they are putting it out there to be judged ok fine but at the same time recognize that they are STILL living their life they way they believe is to be right weather that is on tv or not. That is all anyone can ask for is to live your life the way you believe is right.
 
And that 's ok for a man but not a woman. Why???

I honestly agree with you however they are living their lives they way they believe they should. That is the point.

However I do agree that I find it be wrong that girls are not allowed to wear pants and such but of course my opinion.
 
Wow, just wow!

Then we have a cult in my house and we brainwash our kids. I expect my 3 teenagers to tow the line, so to speak, if they want to keep their cell phones, have a social life, drive the car, etc. Heck, I've even been known to ask them to take turns saying grace before dinner (oh so cultish), attend church with the family....AND Sunday School.

My job is to prepare them to go out into the world, live out their faith, work for what they need and want and give back to others. I don't give them choices of other lifestyles. They may choose differently once they are on their own, but while in my home, they mind their parents and those in authority.
You are not tellnig them they are horrible people and going to hell everytime they break a rule are you? You don't tell your girls they cannot have a job, and that thier only job is to make babies and keep house do you? You don't shun them if they make a mistake do you? All of this happens in quiverfull society.
I admitadly don't know anything at all about the "quiverfull beliefs" - didn't even know there was such a thing until this thread. Maybe if you gave us some examples we'd understand the outrage better. I've only seen the show a few times, so I don't know much about them other than what is portrayed, but I haven't seen anything to cause me outrage or to be overly concerned about them.

It's a fine, difficult line for a parent to tread between WHAT to think and HOW to think. It's one I struggle with. On some topics, I am absolutely, 100% OK with teaching my son WHAT to think. I definitely want him to learn that smoking is bad, for example. People can disagree on that stance, but I'm not going to let him learn and explore the topic on his own. Even now at 2 years old, I comment on stinky smoking to "brainwash" him into thinking that smoking is icky and bad.

I have no doubt that there are families out there who brainwash and abuse their children, unfortunately. I just haven't seen any indication that the Duggars (or the Bates) are those families, and it makes me a little uncomfortable that people often jump to "weird" or "brainwashed" when a kid espouses strong beliefs in a certain set of morals.
Things have changed for the Duggars since thier first special, but not for many of the familes that believe as they do. In most, the girls are not allowed to work outside the home. Michelle said in the first few specials that they didn't believe women should ever work outside the home. They also do not allow thier children to associate with anyone outside the fold, and will choose thier children's spouses. In early shows they talk about "guiding" thier children toward "acceptable" spouses. Once a woman is married, she should never express any opinion without first checking to see if her husband agrees. She should never ever express that she disagrees with anything he says or does, becuase thebible says she is subserviant to him. They blanket train babies as young as six months be hitting them with a switch every time they stray from the blanket. Michelle once described the technique in an interview. They do this so that thier homeschool is not interrupted by the babies needing attention. The Goddard homeschool method, whcih the Duggars used, at least early on, REQUIRED parents to commint to "physical correction" of children who do not have a "meek spirit" at all times.
So I went to wikipedia, and here is the bible passage you mention (as cited by wikipedia, granted, but still...)
Lo, children are an heritage of the LORD:
and the fruit of the womb is his reward.
As arrows are in the hand of a mighty man;
so are children of the youth.
Happy is the man that hath his quiver full of them:
they shall not be ashamed,
but they shall speak with the enemies in the gate.

That sounds like an awesome thing to me, not a passage telling people to prepare lots of kids for an army.

When my husband and I got married, we discussed having a large family (as in 4 or 5, not 19!) and "willingly accepting children from God" as we vowed at our wedding. I guess you could call us quiverfull followers as we really did intend to have as many kids as God had planned for us. Turns out, God planned for us not to have any biological kids, as we adopted our DS, but I don't see anything inherently evil in NOT using birth control. (NOTE: I am not saying people shouldn't use birth control, just that NOT limiting kids isn't wrong either.)

Again, there could be alot going on under the surface that I (and all of us) don't know about, but I think a lot of the negative reaction just comes from people being uncomfortable with how different their lifestyle is, and that saddens me.
the enemy at the gate paretis what quiverfull latches onto. They beleive that the morechildren they produce the mors soldiers God will have in the comingwatr with the anti-christ. I don't think that is valid reaosn for having children. I don't have a problem with large families who WANT to haveall those chidlren, but I would hate to be achild and know that the only reason my parents had me was to be cannon fodder.
 
that makes absolutely no sense.

I agree but its the answer I was told when I asked SIL about it. She is a conservative Christian in the vein of the Duggars who only wears the long skirts. Its also the reasons they have a filter on their internet that tells her all the websites BIL visits.
 












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE











DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter DIS Bluesky

Back
Top Bottom