That story was posted last week, but thanks for bringing it back. It think that it's important because it highlights how we all need to be careful to not believe too much of these news reports.... "Sixty percent of the deaths cover those who have underlying health problems," Chan said. "This means that 40 percent of the fatalities concern young adults -- in good health -- who die of a viral fever in five to seven days.
Or that people in here are misinformed. There is an incredible amount of bad information running around. Frequently, this junk lands in threads like this one where it swirls around and around, taken and repeated as gospel."The other option is that H1N1 is over counted in some areas because actual cases of allergies, colds, bronchitis, 'stomach flu', strep, etc are mistakenly called 'swine flu'."
If that were the case how do you explain why there are hundreds of kids out of school sick this year as compared to every other year? I think that it is more likely that doctors are misdiagnosing. People are going to the doctor and being told it's not swine flu because they have no fever even though over 30% of cases do not present with fever. People are being told that they just have the "regular flu" even though the CDC says that over 99% of flu cases are swine flu. People are being told that they don't have swine flu after a rapid test even though the rapid test has up to a 70% false negative rate. It is obvious that there are doctors out there that are misinformed.
That story was posted last week, but thanks for bringing it back. It think that it's important because it highlights how we all need to be careful to not believe too much of these news reports.
As you can see, the bit that you bolded doesn't logically follow from the part just before.
What do you mean what do I mean?What do you mean?
Sixty percent of the deaths cover those who have underlying health problems," Chan said. "This means that 40 percent of the fatalities concern young adults -- in good health -- who die of a viral fever in five to seven days.
I think that you are making Pennykay's point, but not how she intended.I've followed this thread carefully everyday, but often don't post since so many of you have so much knowledge and techical information, I feel I'm not necessarily qualified to comment about it. I just read and post as a concerned parent. While I've not been panicked about the whole H1N1 situation, I've been educating myself and preparing a just in case scenario.
I have a DD with severe asthma and compromised immune system.
The other day we had an allergist appointment and DD's lung capacity levels at best are registering at 68%. She is being treated accordingly, but when I asked the allergist her opinions and advice for H1N1, she said that she is "freaked out" by the situation (not very professional wording IMO) and that she does recommend the vaccine for DD when it comes out regardless of concern of the adjuvant, etc. She also said, that the vaccine might not be in time anyway, by the time it is ready to go, they get the vaccine and it takes its time to be effective in the body that many will already become sickened with the virus at the rate it is spreading.
She said that it is with patients like DD that this virus is most dangerous for.
Well, I'm taking her "freak outedness" with a grain of salt, but now I am much more concerned about this than I have been.
Thanks to everyone for following the H1N1 information and keeping many of us informed, it is appreciated!
The other option is that H1N1 is overcounted in some areas because actual cases of allergies, colds, bronchitis, 'stomach flu', strep, etc are mistakenly called 'swine flu'.
Or that people in here are misinformed. There is an incredible amount of bad information running around. Frequently, this junk lands in threads like this one where it swirls around and around, taken and repeated as gospel.
Simply put, the average doctor is more qualified to make diagnoses than the average forum denizen.
We weren't talking about official tallies, I don't believe.I don't think this is true. There are no unconfirmed cases counted in any swine tally.
They are grossly underestimated and it's my opinion that it's in the thousands if not the tens of thousands.
Knowing true figures would grossly drop the death toll percentage. That's why I have a really tough time wrapping my brain around the articles that suggest funeral directors (as one example) in NY prepare for 50,000 to 80,000 additional deaths over a 3 month span.
Someone is either hitting unjustified panic buttons, or the public isn't being informed of something.
What's not true?That's simply not true at all. The ONLY way to diagnosed is to be tested. No doctor can look at you and say you have it without performing testing. Then add in that the Rapid test is very faulty, doctors who use it only are no more able to diagnose it than posters on a message board if that test comes back negative (and the vast majority of positive cases do come back negative with this test).
Then you see doctors giving Tamiflu for cases that are not confirmed or cases that pretty mild and they are NOT helping the problem at all. They're enabling the virus to build up an immunity faster, thus yielding it more ineffective for those who do come down with severe cases.
The other option is that H1N1 is overcounted in some areas because actual cases of allergies, colds, bronchitis, 'stomach flu', strep, etc are mistakenly called 'swine flu'.
It's cool how you started your post with it not being conjecture and followed that with a ton of conjecture.My pediatrician told me that they have had cases of people who seemingly had allergy problems that tested postitive for flu. This is not conjecture or someone randomly attributing symptoms to the flu.
And, we know that the totals are grossy underestimated, possibly by millions nationwide, because they are only counting hospitalized cases and deaths. This is also fact and not conjecture.
I also think there are people who have the flu who will just say, "It's just stomach flu (or whatever)" because they don't want it to be swine flu. If it was, they would need to admit the need to stay away from people or alter their schedule, and many people find that too inconvenient. Many also have the "It won't happen to me" attitude.
Regardless, the "official" numbers are WAY lower than actual numbers. We'll never know how much lower, but I doubt you can find evidence to support the overestimation theory.