
Sorry to rain on your parade, but you clearly do not comprehend how the law works in Texas. I am not talking theory, but reality. Parents are regularly held legally responsible for excessive absences, usually defined as over 10% of the school year, or over 18 days of instruction. It's very situational. If Junior was sick for 21 days, he will be able to go on to the next grade, provided his grades are good. But if 10 of those days were for a family vacation, you may find yourself in front of a judge explaining why you should not be fined (or in some cases, jailed) for contributing to truancy.
Doubtless, this energetic determination to see children in school as much as possible is tied to the fact that attendance = funding. Every day that Junior is in school, the school gets money. If Junior is absent, the school does not get that money. If Junior is present when roll is officially taken at _o'clock and then his parents check him out one minute later to catch a flight, he is counted present for that day and the school is happy. Our magic hour is 9 a.m.
We just returned from WDW and DD missed 6 days of school. Our district's written policy is that no school work will be given ahead of time and that it will be given upon her return to school. She will have 6 days to complete what she missed and will receive no grade higher than 70 since the absences were unexcused. That's the
written policy. But her teachers went ahead and gave her most of the work ahead of time and seem to be giving her full credit. Maybe the rules are more rigidly enforced for the older children?? I'm not going to press the issue.
We decided that she could afford to miss the 6 days since she's a straight A student and is almost never sick. I'll make sure she gets a flu shot and I'll be surprised if she misses even 2 more days of school this year. So we should be safe.
But do not assume that the law works the same here as it does in your state. I assure you that many Texas parents have been successfully proscecuted under these statutes and they have held up to legal challenge. If you want to take a child on a vacation of two months, your only recourse here is to formally withdraw that child from school, and thus from the arm of the truancy law. That is, in fact, exactly what I advised a friend to do when she needed to take an extended trip overseas to visit her family and was going to exceed the 18 day limit. I told her to avoid using the "V" word, withdraw her child, go overseas, and when she came back to Texas she should simply re-register her child in the same school. Yes, it was a legal fiction, but it was the only way to make it work. The principal knew what she was doing, but everyone realized it had to be done this way.
I just don't want anyone in Texas to read your post and mistakenly believe they can thumb their noses at the law in Texas. It would be a serious error in judgment.
Trust me, you cannot be hauled into truancy court if you are responsible parents with an achieving child. In ANY state. (The US Dept of Education sets federal policy for ALL states.)
Children are considered truant when they meet ALL three criteria:
1. Excessive, unexplained absences,
2. Lack of parental cooperation with the school system,
3. Poor academic record
So, clearly a responsible parent with a well-achieving child cannot be hauled into truancy court if they remove their child for a family vacation. Even if that vacation is two months long.
It's important for parents to know what their rights are--and that many of these "policies" that are put into place are there for the lowest common denominator of parents. But the fallout affects all parents, especially the responsible ones, who are honest and upfront about their plans.