More anecdotal discussion, I think it’s widely believed Disney looks at the total price per point, including whatever MF’s may be included in the sale and who is paying them. So I would consider that when looking at a price per point. A stripped contract has a lower total price because no MF’s are included, so you could argue Disney can get that contract cheaper, loaded it with their points and repackage it. If they take back a loaded contract they have to factor in those costs to their margins. It doesn’t mean they won’t take a loaded contract if they can meet their margins. At the end of the day it’s about price, loaded or stripped. My opinion, stripped get taken more because we as buyers want to get those cheaper because they don’t have current, or even next UY points, and that just makes it more attractive to Disney. A loaded one we will pay more, because it has bonus points, it moves it out of Disney’s margin, so they don’t take it as often. Just my opinion.