Originally posted by DrTomorrow
Just out of curiosity, why? IIRC, there's going to be a nice bridge over the lake/pond, there should be a nice view, and the Paddock shouldn't be more than a 5-10 min walk to the main area.
At risk of playing armchair psychologist, I think it's mostly a psychological thing. Take getting a good view, for example. Speaking solely for myself, upon receiveing a good view at a hotel room, I usually walk out onto the balcony, marvel at the view for a few minutes, pat myself on the back for my good fortune, and then never set foot out there again.
I'm sure there are quite a few members who use their balconies, but at risk of speaking in generalities, I bet there are many more who don't spend 10 minutes on the balcony during an entire stay.
Regarding location--this one kinda baffles me too. Particularly when we're discussing Disney. Probably every person on these boards has made more than a few seemingly senseless trips all the way across a theme park--perhaps to purchase an item, grab a FastPass or check on a show time. Yet walking 10 minutes to a pool is somehow stigmatized when compared to the 6-8 minutes it takes from most rooms at BWV or BCV.
If I were forced to rank, I'd probably go Congress Park, The Springs then The Paddock. Given a choice, I'd probably take the view over the location in this particular debate. CP is also closer to Downtown Disney--a frequent destination during our trips.
But none of this is to say that The Paddock would represent an undesirable location, it just doesn't top the list.