Spurlock Lecture Causes Stir at Pa. School

bicker

DIS Veteran<br><img src="http://www.wdwinfo.com/di
Joined
Aug 19, 1999
Messages
44,147
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060326/ap_en_tv/filmmaker_speech

I think Spurlock is a genius, and his film and television series covered very important issues, very well. I think, though, that such a smart guy should be able to get his message across without using profanity and without insulting special education students. Don't you? I'd like to assume that this is just one reporters biased and overzealous distortion of what happened, but it is AP, a very reliable and trustworthy news source.
 
While I enjoyed his movie and believe that it made a very good point, I have absolutely no respect for someone who insults special needs people in front of an auditorium of high school students (which include special needs people.) His point could easily been made without insults and profanity.

I would make darn sure he never spoke at a school in our district if that was his method of delivery!
 
"Most of the 700 students laughed, gave him a standing ovation and mobbed him for autographs."

I find this hideously sad and pathetic. What a heartless group of teenagers. I feel so sorry for the mentally disabled students How degrading and humiliating for them. :(
 

I would guess that the insensitive line about the mentally disabled students was a very small part of substantial presentation, and even most of the conscientious students likely put it out of their mind long before the end of the presentation when they cheered Spurlock. The blame here is squarely with Spurlock, assuming he said what is alleged; I wouldn't expect an auditorium full of spectators to judge the presentation based solely on what for them perhaps represented a very small portion of the whole. That would be akin to people storming out of a Broadway musical in disgust because one actor missed one cue.

Furthermore, the blame, again assuming it is warranted, isn't a mortal sin. He hasn't had any chance to defend his statement since we started discussing it, or even since the report was put out by AP. He deserves the right to consider what he said and regret it, express remorse, and gain the forgiveness of those upset by what he said. He has very firm basis for insulting McDonald's, and I could imagine in his outrage for being directed to curb his speech about McDonald's he overreacted and said something he didn't even believe. He needs to address the issue, but I would hope we'd give him as much consideration as we expected him to give others.
 
Bicker, very true. But still, as of right now, with no other explanations from him, I find this extremely offensive.
 
I've left him a message on his website asking for him to respond to the AP's charges. I'll check back in a week and see if he's replied.
 
To the Students, Teachers, Parents, Administrators of Hatboro Horsham High School, the Hatboro Horsham Education Foundation, and anyone else who has now heard of the events of last Friday in Pennsylvania, Throughout the year, I travel to various colleges and high schools to talk about my experiences in making Super SIze Me, the impact it has had on me and the community, and what kids can do to make a difference in their own lives. That was my goal when I went to speak to the students of Hatboro Horsham High School.

As I told both the principal and superintendent of schools after my lecture, it is never my intent to insult or demean anyone – and I understand how some of my remarks may have offended some in attendance and if you feel they did, then I am deeply sorry.

When I speak at schools, I try to express my views on difficult topics with humor and a joking mannerism. I try to connect with students by conveying my thoughts in an accessible form, using the same speech and tone that they or I would use in any other lively conversation. One student even said to me, “you didn’t say anything that we aren’t going to hear later on TV,” and that was my sole intent.

I do, however, believe it is very important for me to address many of the points made in the media.

First and most importantly, it should be made clear that the only person I called “retarded” was myself when I was unable to hear a question from the audience. Having done work with special needs children in the past, something this hurtful would never come from my lips. I did make an aside about kids sleeping in the back wearing helmets, which was done with no malicious intent (I was playing it as a slacker reference to the Jon Heder character in the upcoming film “Benchwarmers,” a reference which was lost and, as I was later told, there were no actual students wearing helmets in the back).

I have also been portrayed as someone who spewed profanity for a full hour. To set the record straight, I said only five “dirty” words during the entire speech.

The Superintendent said to me backstage that the only words he had problems with were the “F-Bombs,” (of which there were only two) so perhaps I should have toned down even those two uses, but as another student told me, it’s nothing they hadn’t heard before.

It has also been said that I insulted faculty, when in actuality, all I was doing was making a joke at their expense for the enjoyment of the students. While the main floor of the auditorium was full, 7 or 8 teachers sat up in the balcony. During the Q&A after my talk, I asked them if they had any questions for me. They shook their heads no and I said to the kids, “You see, while you guys sit down here and watch, the teachers sit up in the balcony and smoke pot.” The students roared with laughter, and once again, that was all I wanted to do: entertain the kids.

Lastly, in the article it quoted me as saying that the greatest lesson those kids learned was the importance of freedom of speech. When saying that, I did not mean that you have the right to insult anyone at will (as many people have interpreted it.) I was referring to the fact that the group that hired me to speak asked that I not mention McDonald’s in any of my talk because one of their board members owns a franchise. That would be like asking Neil Armstrong to speak but tell him he can’t bring up walking on the moon, so needless to say, I didn’t agree to their censorship.

Please know that any comment I made in my speech was done in a comical tone without an ounce of vindictive purpose. While it may be too late for apologies for many in the community, I hope this in some small way can start to make amends with the rest of you.

As an individual who fights daily for us all to find some common ground in this world, I am hopeful that the work I do can continue to generate a positive dialogue, inspire action and make this world a better place.

Sincerely,

Morgan Spurlock
I'm not suprised to learn that there was more to the story than what the school administrators choose to tell the Associated Press. Regardless, Spulock's apology seems genuine, and should effectively put this matter to bed. I checked his blog again this afternoon, and is it clear there are some folks who aren't big enough to accept an apology. What a shame.
 
I enjoy Morgan Spurlock immensely. Sounds like a mountain being made out of a molehill IMHO. He explained himself and it sounds both plausible and genuine. I can live with it. Hope eveyone else can.
 
I detest McDonald's (totally yucky food and often dirty). I'm vaguely aware of "Supersize Me", but to tell the truth I have no idea who this guy is.

So I have no pre-conceived notions about him, but I am just as appalled that someone would use references being "retarded" as a basis for humor as I would be if someone used racial stereo types to "make a joke" at a school.

This was not a nightclub - it was a school. Big difference - the special needs students didn't have a choice about being there.

Just extremely poor taste even if it was not done intentionally. I have a number of very dear individuals in my life who have been affected by Down's Syndrome, Autism, severe head injuries from a car accident, cerebral palsy, etc. They may not be perfectly "normal" in some people's eyes, but they do have feelings that can be hurt and are far more functioning that many people wish to believe.
 
arminnie said:
I have no pre-conceived notions about him, but I am just as appalled that someone would use references being "retarded" as a basis for humor as I would be if someone used racial stereo types to "make a joke" at a school.

This was not a nightclub - it was a school. Big difference - the special needs students didn't have a choice about being there.

Just extremely poor taste even if it was not done intentionally.

The language used (both the profanity, jokes and insults) where completely inappropriate for the setting. I hope any other educational institution thinks very hard before they ever invite him to speak.
 
HayGan said:
The language used (both the profanity, jokes and insults) where completely inappropriate for the setting. I hope any other educational institution thinks very hard before they ever invite him to speak.


I agree. Just because the students have heard those words (the f-bombs) before, doesn't mean the school should condone it. And that's just what they did when they hired him to speak.
 
As well they should: It's clear from some of the comments from students that Spurlock reaches them. His language should be irrelevant: Either the sponsors should have known Spurlock's penchant for colorful language, or they should accept personal accountability for having engaged him for the talk anyway, because his reputation of being able to very effectively deliver very important information about health.
 
I'm a huge fan of his but I don't find his methods or comments particularly appropriate for the setting. Yeah he may have gotten a laugh out of the kids with the comment about the teachers smoking pot but it really wasn't really something he should have said. Not the big deal that it's been made to be but he should be more aware of his audience and speak accordingly. Just my two cents.
 












Save Up to 30% on Rooms at Walt Disney World!

Save up to 30% on rooms at select Disney Resorts Collection hotels when you stay 5 consecutive nights or longer in late summer and early fall. Plus, enjoy other savings for shorter stays.This offer is valid for stays most nights from August 1 to October 11, 2025.
CLICK HERE













DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top