Almost everything in life does. But we are discussing generalities here. And in GENERAL (and by general I mean for a significant majority), the old system required less planning. That's what you don't seem to get despite the fact that multiple posters have already corrected fallacies in your logic.
This is what I don't understand. If you like FP+ that's great, but why are people compelled to defend it with absolute falsehoods? If FP+ is fantastic, why not defend it with accurate information? By saying the FP+ does not require any more pre planning than Legacy, the credibility of the pp becomes questionable.