There is mixed information on this. At least one SW FA is reporting that they are advised not to become involved or to prohibit seat saving. So now I have read various posters who say they will
- have only one member of their party pay for early boarding, and save seats for the rest
- not pay, board with their family, and demand that others move (which may be a challenge if so many people on MCO flights do choose to pay for early boarding)
- not pay and wait until the 24 hour mark to check in, risking getting a B or a C pass, but expect to sit with their family
- have only the adult in the party pay for early boarding, since SW 'won't make' their small children stand in the boarding line alone while Mom boards, thereby getting three people on board for the price of one
- not pay for early boarding, board with their group, and disregard a 'saved' seat and take it for their own use
Does anyone see any conflict here? I suspect that with all these tactics and competing interests, tensions will rise when many travellers are already stressed. Sadly I foresee conflict, altercations, denied boarding, or worse in the future on at least a few flights.
Not every family consists of three people so seating is a giant jigsaw puzzle. By the time the B or C group boards there may well only be middle seats left.
And over on the Family board there are readers still convinced that SW FAs will rearrange the entire aircraft so that their family can sit together, even if they didn't pay for early boarding, or the plane simply won't take off. I think that more than a few people are going to be very disappointed.