sometimes you just want to shake your head (political)

jennyanydots

<font color=blue>'Their behavior's not good and th
Joined
Mar 7, 2004
Messages
1,127
NY times

Police Offer Convention Demonstrators a Rally Site Far From the Garden
By DIANE CARDWELL

Published: July 15, 2004


he Police Department drew a line in the sand yesterday for the group planning the largest protest during the Republican National Convention next month, telling the protest organizers they can hold a giant rally only along the West Side Highway, four long blocks from the convention site. If the group disagrees with the site, police officials said, its leaders can sue the city.

Advertisement


"This is our final offer," said Police Commissioner Raymond W. Kelly, flanked by the city's parks and transportation commissioners, at a news conference at Police Headquarters. "Obviously they have the ability to go to court and resolve it in some fashion that way."

The group, United for Peace and Justice, sought a permit for 250,000 people to rally on the Great Lawn in Central Park for speeches against the war in Iraq and other Bush administration policies on Aug. 29, the day before the convention begins. But the Parks Department rejected that site, saying that the area cannot hold that many people and that a huge rally could damage the lawn. Instead, police officials have suggested that demonstrators march past Madison Square Garden, where the convention will be held, and then rally, stretched along 30-odd blocks, from West and Chambers Streets to possibly as far north as 12th Avenue and 34th Street.

"It is, we believe, a reasonable alternative, and we need closure on this issue now," Mr. Kelly said. "The ball is in their court."

Protest organizers said they were "blindsided" by the news conference and were never informed that the West Side Highway was a take-it-or-leave-it option. They said that the site would make it hard to construct a sound system that participants miles from the stage could hear, and that protesters would be excessively hot and marginalized at the edge of the city.

"We do not think this is the way this rally should be conducted," said Leslie Cagan, national coordinator for United for Peace and Justice, which plans to demonstrate today at City Hall in support of a Central Park site. "We will continue to work for what we believe is the best way to have our demonstration." Calling the protest site on the far West Side the worst alternative to the park, she asked city officials to remain "open to the range of possibilities that we have put on the table and not give us ultimatums."

But the city's decision, and its very public way of communicating it to the organizers, made it clear that the Bloomberg administration is placing a premium on preserving order during the convention in heavily used areas like Central Park and Times Square.

The Police and Parks Departments have approved permits for 14 organizations to stage protests during the convention, including a prayer vigil by the Christian Defense Coalition opposite Madison Square Garden, a reading of the Constitution by People for the American Way at the Central Park band shell and a 12-hour anti-gun-violence display at Union Square Park organized by Silent March.

In addition, the Police Department has reached an agreement with another antiwar group, Not in Our Name, for a rally on Eighth Avenue south of 31st Street on the evening of Sept. 2, when President Bush is scheduled to accept his party's nomination. The group originally applied for a permit for a march and rally leaving from Union Square, but the department rejected that and instead offered the stationary rally. Protest organizers had originally been reluctant to agree to the proposal because of concerns about searches and about the potential use of four-sided metal barricades, like those used in a February 2003 antiwar protest, that keep demonstrators within the length of each block

The use of such pens has been a sharp point of contention between the police and the protesters, and the department is involved in a civil lawsuit that is seeking a court order barring universal bag searches and discouraging the use of four-sided pens. The suit was brought by the New York Civil Liberties Union and three people who say they were treated roughly by the police at the February 2003 protest, organized by United for Peace and Justice.

But Not in Our Name, at least, was willing to agree to the Police Department's proposal because officials have said that they will not search people unless they have a specific reason to do so and that they plan to use three-sided enclosures with entrance and exit points, as they did at a rally in March.

"They'll be able to come and go, and we are going to search only if there is a reason," said Paul J. Browne, the Police Department's deputy commissioner for public information.

For United for Peace and Justice, though, the negotiations have yielded little progress. An umbrella group formed in 2002 as the country moved toward war with Iraq, it has grown from a handful of local and national organizations to more than 800 across the country. Although some of its events have been marred by clashes with the police, many of them have gone smoothly, with few arrests and little or no disorder.

Indeed, city officials insist that the sticking point stems from the protest's size, not its politics. The Police Department approved the group's request to march directly past the Garden before the convention begins, but have rejected alternative rally proposals at Times Square and along Third Avenue from Midtown to the 60's. Mr. Kelly said yesterday that squeezing a quarter of a million people along a proposed route to Times Square from 59th Street was impractical, and Iris Weinshall, the transportation commissioner, said that a rally on Third Avenue would overwhelm residential side streets and clog access to Manhattan from East River crossings.

But organizers appeared to want to keep their options open, neither accepting nor rejecting the site outright, and deflecting for now Commissioner Kelly's challenge to sue.

"We are fully prepared to maintain the negotiations with the city," Ms. Cagan said, adding that they would attend a meeting with police officials set for tomorrow morning, in the hopes of reaching an agreement and obtaining the legal permits. "We are not on that day engaging in civil disobedience."


and then I remembered:


simon & Garfunkel 1981



Enjoy the Central Park reunion with half a million fans as Simon and Garfunkel perform together for the first time in 11 years. Filmed on September 19, 1981, the beautiful performance bespeaks the emotional intensity of the occasion. Songs include career-making hits such as "Mrs. Robinson," "Bridge Over Troubled Water," "Homeward Bound," "Sound of Silence," "America," and many more classics.

500,000 could fit for a concert, but 250,000 won't fit for a protest?
 
I think they should be allowed to rally in central park -- they're right about being "marginalized":

daily news
 
Could the issue be the number of security forces needed to manage 250,000 people?
 
if you're going to have 250,000 people on the west side, you still need all those cops, don't you?

I saw some city spokesman on tv last night who said "they just won't fit in that space".
 

Considering that two people were actually arrested for wearing anti Bush t shirts at the July 4th rally ( later released when the judge said the police had no authority to arrest them for "trespassing" ) things do not bode well for these conventions.
 
That July 4th rally was in West Virginia, though, right? The two were arrested by Charleston police officers. That was really dumb, but either there was another incident, or there's a political convention in WV that I don't know about, or the two things don't have anything to do with each other.
 
I thought we were discussing how police were going to handle crowds. Whether the crowds are at a convention or at a rally seems irrelevant.
 
/
We had a problem atur local airport when Bush came here. Demonstrators (protesting the war in Iraq) were kept over a mile away, and a Bush supporter (not an official) was quoted in the paper saying the demonstrators should be shot in the streets for treason.

I guess the cops have their hands full.
 
Unfortunately it's not just the Republican convention that is supposedly unfair to protesters. This year seems to be stretching the patience of everyone in the cities involved.
The Democrats are having the same problems in Boston with protesters being kept quite a long way away and complaining about it.
Even my local paper came out tonight with an editorial saying the need for conventions is over and they should be eliminated in the future.
I don't believe I will be affected with any inconvenience, but I know several people who are just downright disgusted with the disruptions.
 
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Enjoy the Central Park reunion with half a million fans as Simon and Garfunkel perform together for the first time in 11 years. Filmed on September 19, 1981, the beautiful performance bespeaks the emotional intensity of the occasion. Songs include career-making hits such as "Mrs. Robinson," "Bridge Over Troubled Water," "Homeward Bound," "Sound of Silence," "America," and many more classics.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That concert was before the new lawn was installed in the late '90's. With the new lawn, the park people (park nazis) protect that lawn like it was their child. I've worked in Central Park, and when you need to do any work on the lawn, you need a park nazi to approve it and watch you. If you need to run one cable across 20' of grass, the park nazis make you put 4' by 8' pieces of plywood under the cable for the enitire 20'!!! I kid you not. It's insane. Also, if your show or protest damages one of the trees, it can cost you over $100,000!!! Their attitude is that it's their park and their rules. You follow their rules or your out.
 
i heard one genius on tv say that trying to fit 250,000 into the park is like trying to fit a crowd that size into Shea -- shea's got a capacity of 50,000 or so.

lmake them post a bond if you must, but let them play in the park.
 
Randi,

I agree..bith conventions are going to be a nightmare for too many people.

artvandelay,

That is a very logical explanation, thanks for your input.
 
then rally, stretched along 30-odd blocks, from West and Chambers Streets to possibly as far north as 12th Avenue and 34th Street
I can't even begin to imagine 250,000 people stretched along city streets! :confused:
 
Originally posted by barbeml
a Bush supporter (not an official) was quoted in the paper saying the demonstrators should be shot in the streets for treason.

Well, probably not all that surprising coming from a war supporter. Probably a card-carrying NRA member too, I bet. :rotfl:
 
Originally posted by Planogirl
I can't even begin to imagine 250,000 people stretched along city streets! :confused:

there are more than 250,000 in Times Square every New Year's Eve.
 
I can see Times Square but that's apparently been rejected too. Will these people be stretched along sidewalks or what exactly? I'm not familiar with NYC, I guess it's obvious. :)
 
they're supposed to be stretched along the West Side Highway. that's a relatively isolated area along the river and away from the action.
 
When I started reading this post, I immediately thought about
the Simon and Garfunkel concert. West Side Highway indeed!
They are just screaming for civil disobedience, why can't they(the
people in charge) be fair. They can handle Times Square once a year but not Central Park? SSDD

My favorite bumper sticker to date:

"I liked it much better when the PRESIDENT was getting
screwed"
 
blades of grass

What happens when you pit wacky terror-sympathizers, hell-bent on raising well, hell, during next month's Republican National Convention, against a City Hall less concerned with the First Amendment than with blades of grass?

Chaos, that's what.

And the potential for some very serious safety and security problems.

Just yesterday, protestors from the Loony Left umbrella group called United for Peace and Justice (UPJ) staged a mini-dry-run rally to protest for the right to protest.

They say city officials have acted in "bad faith" in negotiating a site for next month's shindig.

The group had sought to gather on Central Park's Great Lawn, but City Hall said no on the dubious grounds that the demonstrators would be bad for the grass.



On Wednesday, Police Commissioner Ray Kelly offered another site — a march route past the convention at Madison Square Garden and a stretch of the West Side Highway south of 34th Street. Demanding "closure," Kelly said that was the city's "final offer." But UPJ balked.

Let's face it: If the Great Lawn must be off-limits for large rallies in deference to grass, then maybe it never should have been restored in the first place.

But given that it has been restored, Mayor Mike must now find a way to satisfy the protestors — as wacky as we think they are — and their desire to exercise their free-speech rights.

Whether by finding some other suitable site — or just letting them use the park.

We favor the latter course.

Better that violence is done to the Great Lawn than to the First Amendment.

As for the matter of "bad faith," first prize goes to UPJ; its leaders have been demanding a face-to-face meeting with Mayor Mike for weeks — never mind that Bloomberg has much better things to do with his time than waste it sitting down with such folks.

Indeed, given its makeup, it's hard not to suspect that UPJ would rather have the issue than a reasonable settlement.

But as the convention's Aug. 30 start date approaches, and planning time runs short, it's vital that UPJ and the city reach an agreement quickly.

Again, without proper planning, chaos can erupt — which is yet another reason for City Hall to yield up some turf for a Great Lawn rally.

UPJ and city brass will meet today; let's ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^hope they can find common . . . ground.

OMG I actually agree with the NY Post. Better violence to the Great Lawn than to the First Amendment.
 

PixFuture Display Ad Tag












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE














DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top