Planogirl
I feel the nerd in me stirring
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2000
- Messages
- 49,734
There was a comment recently from a frequent poster to the effect that Pixar was using a stale formula and the poster said basically "who needs them anyway". But that aside, I agree that most "snowglobers" don't feel that way. As for the term "snowglober", like I said before I own one so what does that make me?
As for the other side or the POSITIVE side, there is often a sense that those who critique Eisner a bit too much or Disney in general too often (and who defines that?), should just quit going to the Disney parks and I would also assume, to this website. I feel like everyone here cares about Disney in their own way and also believes that they have something to say so it's demoralizing to be told indirectly or even directly to either go and like it or shut up. Again, I realize that it's only a few posters that do this but it does happen.
So it works both ways in my view. Snowglober or basher. Or whatever. It's only terminology born out of frustration in my opinion.

As for the other side or the POSITIVE side, there is often a sense that those who critique Eisner a bit too much or Disney in general too often (and who defines that?), should just quit going to the Disney parks and I would also assume, to this website. I feel like everyone here cares about Disney in their own way and also believes that they have something to say so it's demoralizing to be told indirectly or even directly to either go and like it or shut up. Again, I realize that it's only a few posters that do this but it does happen.
So it works both ways in my view. Snowglober or basher. Or whatever. It's only terminology born out of frustration in my opinion.