Thanks Dan!This one's easy. I'm right there with Kevin and Katie, have seen none of the movies, have read none of the books, and really no desire to do either.
Glad you were able to get in town to the store. Is it on Michigan Avenue? Any special restaurant while you guys were here?
Good choice by Katie there. Sounds like a fun day.Thanks Dan!
Yes it is - across the street from the big NIKE store. They used to call it NIKE Town, but I'm not sure if they still do. Then after that we had dinner at Gino's East - Katie wanted to go there before she leaves to start grad school on the 23rd.
Same here. Love the books, grew up reading them but can't stand the films and hate how much they changed. I dont mind up to Prisoner of Azkaban, but everything else I've struggled with and have probably only seen them maybe once or twice.That said, I really hate most of the movies. I understand the need to summarize and rework details when compressing a long book into a 2-hour movie. I get it.
But to change details just for the sake of changing details? What? I do like the first and second movies and tolerate most of the others. There's just so much cringey stuff. Like the start of Half-Blood Prince where Harry appears to flirt with a waitress in a muggle shop? And the whole Harry/Ginny hiding of the potions book in the Room of Requirement? Really?
Which do you like better?I'm a HUGE HP fan. Of the books. I listen to the audiobooks multiple times a year (Jim Dale AND Stephen Fry).
My sister-in-law loves the Stephen Fry version, and I originally copied some of her CDs into iTunes and added to my iPod (see how old I am?). I didn't care for them initially. They're definitely a bit more "audiobook" rather than Jim Dale's "audioperformance." Now that I bought them all, I see the draw. His version is definitely more "British" than Jim Dale's version.Which do you like better?
I have the Jim Dale and love them, but I'm curious how Stephen Fry's version is as well.