Excuse me?
Both parties contributed to the economic success of the partnership and both reaped its benefits. Are you saying we should attempt quantify which spouse contributed more?
Well I get what you are saying, but for us, even when the kids got back in school, if I went back to work my DH and I would have never seen each other. He worked nights and weekends and for us, having a relationship was far more important than me working. I know this isn' the norm, but for us it worked. I also didn't want my kids going to after school care, I preferred to stay home with them and get them to their after school activities. I had plenty of moms that worked depend on me to get their kids where they needed to be.
In the end, my DH wanted me at home and I wanted to be home, everyone is different and I realize that this doesn't work for most people, but I felt it more important to be home and actually see my DH and be there for my kids. It worked for us and is still working.
That being said, I don't think that unlimited alimony is a good idea, there has be be some boundaries.
ETA, Just because kids go to school, doesn't mean that they don't need you when school is out. My priority was them, not a job or a career, but my kids. Others feel differently and have different circumstances, as will my DD, but it worked for me, and I wouldn't change a thing.
that might work if you only have a child or two but if you decide on having a larger family? it would have cost more than my pay to have 4 kids in daycare.. sorry I'm not going to work to pay someone else to raise our kids which it what it would have worked out to being.![]()
Have you priced child care lately? With 4 kids, you would probably wind up paying child care a LOT more than you even make. All for the "benefit" of working outside the home?!?![]()
It is a choice made jointly, and both parties should be responsible for the consequences of that choice.
I think today is very much like the 1950s, but with the 'rules' reversed - women have the opportunity to work in pretty much any field they choose, but along with that opportunity has come condemnation for those who opt not to do so.
I'm a long-term SAHM to the point that I joke about retiring at 22. I've been out of the workforce 15 years now with no real plans to re-enter at all. The issues that led us to me leaving my job haven't vanished because the kids got older. My husband still works in a field that makes it impossible for me to count on him for any help in the evenings, because he doesn't know in the morning what time he'll get home at night. And my training/experience is still in a profession that would demand a long commute and sometimes erratic hours. One of us needs to know that we'll be home to get the kids from childcare, to drive to/from evening activities, to make dinner and run baths and get the kids to bed and since neither of our chosen job paths accommodates that we decided the most practical choice is for one of us to be at home. Since I never had the passion for my job that DH has for his, I gladly left mine behind and haven't looked back. He's been able to do more, career-wise, than he could have if he was balancing work and family, and we've been able to give the kids opportunities that we couldn't if they didn't have me available to handle all the logistics.
You have to make a lot of money to be able to pay for 4 kids in day care.
Also yes moms who work do all of this, but SAHM do it at least 40 hours a week more than working moms. It is what it is.
I do feel that kids in daycare are being raised in part by someone else, especially when young. They get dropped of at 7:00 don't get picked up until 6:00. Early bed time. Sorry but time dictates that the daycare spends way more time than the parent does.
Eventually those kids will be in school full time. Eventually they will not need after school care. There is also the thing called part time work-I did it for eight years.
At what point does this come.. this is a serious question.. as of this August I will be childless during the day but my youngest is 4 so someone still needs to be here before school/after school and all summer.. I'm basically the only stay at home mom around, most moms work. They have having to find child care for the summer for their kids now.. I know I'll have at least 2 extra from 7a-4:30p everyday during the summer because they aren't old enough to stay home alone.. they are 4 and 8. She is a newly single mom so this was sorta just dumped on her.. she is not getting child support and dad is out of the picture. (no more details will be provided) btw I'm doing this for free..
I work and have six kids. And thanks for saying someone else raised them. My son just go his masters degree, um, I take full credit for raising him!
Well it depends on the kid but I don't know too many 17 year old who need babysitting.
Of course you raised him.. but if it was going to cost you money to send him (them) to daycare, putting your check in the negative. Wouldn't you have stayed home as well? That is what my situation is.. and good for your sonbtw to put more into my situation my dh is NOW in college (deans list at PSU) He really isn't home much.
my 12 yr old has an IQ of 59 she'll always need baby sitting. She is hard to describe. She is normal in so many ways yet her reading, writing and math suck. I really dont know if I'd ever trust her home alone for 8 hours +.
I don't get this, kids grow up, eventually you won't have to run baths for them anymore. Some even get their licenses and drive themselves around! No plans ever to work?
I don't know, I love my job. I am a special education teacher and know I make a difference.
Plans may change but at this point, no. We're content with the income I bring in without a job (mostly crafting, a little freelancing - not quite what part-time retail would bring in but pretty close), and I don't think the kids cease to benefit from a parent at home when they hit school age. In fact, if I could only be home for one block of time I wouldn't have chosen baby-hood - I'd have chosen that awkward phase of late middle/early high school when they're too old for most organized after school programs but too young and vulnerable to peer pressures to be counted on to entertain themselves in a positive manner when left to their own devices on a daily basis.
For the specifics of our situation as it is now and as we plan it to be in the future - two of our three in a private school that expects a great deal of parental involvement, one planning on a magnet high school program that would require we arrange our own transportation - it doesn't make sense for me to go back to full time work and (selfishly, I'll admit) I'd rather be home pursuing my own interests than out ringing groceries because it fits "mom hours". We may venture into business for ourselves again - DH had his own home improvement business until last year but just couldn't keep it going in the current economy, and I was his entire "office staff" - and I will likely do more freelancing and maybe expand into consignment or online sales with my sewing rather than just Christmas craft shows when I have more downtime to fill during the day, but juggling two full time employment schedules is just not something that DH & I are interested in doing. Coordinating the schedules we already have is hard enough without adding another set of demands to the mix.
I understand what you're saying here, but consider it from the other side... the spouse who stays in the workforce should understand that, when the two of them made the choice for one to stay home and one to work, the working spouse also made a choice.... to commit some of his/her future earning potential to supporting the nonworking spouse, in order to get the benefits of having a stay-at-home partner keeping the home fires burning.
Nobody put a gun to the working spouse's head, either. He/she should know that his/her spouse won't have the same earning potential after staying out of the workforce for 15 years.
But I do agree that lifetime alimony should be a rare thing. I'm actually surprised to hear that it's still awarded fairly often in some parts of the U.S.