Aidensmom
Holy Crap!<br><font color=blue>Murdered By Pineapp
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2005
- Messages
- 10,746
auntpolly said:So if she sang "Take me home Country Roads" the agenda would be to get everyone to move to West Virginia?![]()

auntpolly said:So if she sang "Take me home Country Roads" the agenda would be to get everyone to move to West Virginia?![]()
Chuck S said:Reaching? A song praising God for destroying Sodom isn't anti-gay? A publically funded school should endorse this? Are you so naive as to think if similar lyrics were sung about Christians there wouldn't be an uproar?
I also noticed you didn't answer this part:
Should they "expect" to hear a song about God's wrath upon them? Would it be appropriate?
Charade said:Hey now! I agree with you! I was just expanding on what EsX said.
Chuck S said:Reaching? A song praising God for destroying Sodom isn't anti-gay? A publically funded school should endorse this? Are you so naive as to think if similar lyrics were sung about Christians there wouldn't be an uproar?
It is also generally recognized that sodomy has been used as an act of subjugation by heterosexual males in many cultures for thousands of years. So this incident says nothing in support of the contention that the citizens of Sodom were largely homosexual.
I also noticed you didn't answer this part:
Should they "expect" to hear a song about God's wrath upon them? Would it be appropriate?
Chuck S said:But the question isn't about a radio where you can simply turn the station (heck, I don't listen to Pat Robertson, and it doesn't bother me that his program is available). Nor is it about being "secure", I am secure in the knowledge that I am a gay man, listening to that song isn't going to change me. The question is should people that go to a school function to watch a child from their family perform reasonably expect to hear a song praising God for destroying gay people, or an anti-Christian song, or any other religious/political song? It is NOT appropriate.
But it is widely believed by many Christians, isn't it?Charade said:I've read interpretations of the S&G story which speculate that it's possible that even though sodomy was one of the main reasons S&G were destroyed, it doesn't neccessarily mean that all of the men that did that were homosexuals.
Since the Bible contains other references to homosexuality being a sin, perhaps it should be banned (or burned) as well.
This is what a lot of Christians believe. Remember, love the sinner, hate the sin.
Again, they would also issue a permit for your church picnic in the park. It is still a privately funded function. The city is not funding the marches, are they?Regardless, many cities and munciplaties issue permits for pro-gay marches. They also issue permits to the KKK. Neither is an endoresment IMO by the government.
Nope, they should not EXPECT to hear a pro-gay song any more than they should hear an anti-gay song. It isn't a "rally" for Christ or a rally for gay people, it is a secular, publically funded talent show. Both would be inappropriate at this venue, wouldn't they?Should they expect to hear a pro-gay song? Heck, their kid could sing one.
Chuck S said:The question is should people that go to a school function to watch a child from their family perform reasonably expect to hear a song praising God for destroying gay people, or an anti-Christian song, or any other religious/political song? It is NOT appropriate.
auntpolly said:I'm a huge SoCaS supporter but I think this takes it waaaaay too far. Unless she's doing a sing-a-long, she's just expressing herself. What next? A child's faith not allowed in crayon drawings and essays, too? I want everyone to express themselves. I love to hear expressions of all people's faiths, as long as they aren't insisting on praying with them their way.
What? Are your ears so delicate they can't even bear to hear the words?
EsmeraldaX said:My thoughts exactly. I am very much for the SoCaS but I don't see how this is government sanctioned religion, letting a kid sing a song.Are people in the auditorium being required by law to convert to her religion? I must have missed that part somewhere. I always thought SoCaS was to prevent the gov from endorsing and mostly REQUIRING it's people to be a certain religion, much like the system our forefathers fled. Is that the case here?