Shoes in the Concierge Lounges

[skiwee1]

I guess I was raised to not do something if it has negative effects on others.



Have a great day !


MaryLiz

And I guess those of us that do not think wearing pjs is right in a public place were obviously raised differently. Wearing a strange outfit that doesn't suit ones taste is totally different then coming out into public in pjs. This is one of the main reasons I don't do WDW concierge. It seems that there are too many that do not know how one is supposed to act at them. Thankfully the concierges we stay at other places have a totally different class of people. And I don't mean financially different.

 

[shellybaxter]

Wow - I guess I just see things way different. While I've never gone to the lounge in my pjs, I had no problem with those who did. As for shoes, I work in a child care center where shoes aren't even allowed in some of the rooms, so walking inside barefoot is just second nature to me. I would never have known it upset people so much. I'll try to remember shoes in the future. Sometimes I do wish people had more tolarance for those who have different beliefs and norms from themselves though.

 

[honeymo78]

I actually would feel comfortable walking around in my jammies in the lobby of the poly or gf, or any hotel for that matter. My jammies are more appropriate "public" attire than a lot of what I see these days. I guess I must not have been raised properly and don't know how to act. Oh well, glad we're not on concierge with some of you folks.

 

[TammiMcMan]

And if concierge wants to post a "no jammies" policy, then I would certainly abide. MaryLiz

I've been trying to find my concierge information, but I'm almost positive that mixed in with our welcome package was a request that "proper attire" be worn in the concierge lounge. I agree that some pj's cover up more than what others consider clothing and is a t-shirt with vulgarity on it better than a robe? That's why I think all that is needed is the term "proper".

By definition, it's:

1. Characterized by appropriateness or suitability; fitting: the proper knife for cutting bread; not a proper moment for a joke.
2. Called for by rules or conventions; correct: the proper form for a business letter.
3. Strictly following rules or conventions, especially in social behavior; seemly: a proper lady; a proper gentleman.

 

[TammiMcMan]

As for shoes, I work in a child care center where shoes aren't even allowed in some of the rooms. Sometimes I do wish people had more tolarance for those who have different beliefs and norms from themselves though.

To make your point, if the child care center does not allow shoes in certain rooms, I would respect that, even though I'm not comfortable being barefoot. I don't look upon that as your child care company being intolerant of my beliefs or norm. I look at it as following a rule. Why is that so different from asking someone who normally goes barefoot to wear shoes in a public place?

 

[maryliz]

Not sure what kind of jammies some of you think I have. And since I am quite capable of "reading between the lines", I just remembered why I don't spend much time on the Resorts board.

Be very happy that you don't have more in life that makes you uncomfortable than "seeing someone in PJ's". I can think of lots more things to see that would bother me. But everyone is different, so maybe you should all be writing Disney to get them to post the policy if it bothers you as much as it appears to on this thread. I'll be happy to oblige if they do. And not an issue since none of our planned upcoming trips have us staying concierge.

MaryLiz

 

[maryliz]

Sometimes I do wish people had more tolarance for those who have different beliefs and norms from themselves though.

Well said ! And having that ability is a true definition of "class" !

 

[DisneyMommyMichelle]

ohh and a quick point that it does not only happen in WDW concierge lounges. My DH and i stayed concierge at the marriott DT chicago for Valentines day weekend a coupla years ago and as we were having our breakfast in walks a barefoot woman in a:


DRUMROLL PLEASE....

TOWEL!~!!

What on earth???

 

[TammiMcMan]

Not sure what kind of jammies some of you think I have.

MaryLiz, I thought you were talking about the cotton jersey pj bottoms that are quite popular right now. My daughter has a few pairs and she's told me that a lot of her college friends wear them to classes. I definitely didn't think you were talking about baby dolls .

Anyway, that's why I said that using the term "proper attire" would be more appropriate. If we're talking flannel pajama bottoms with sleepy kitties all over them, well that's not what I consider proper, but the yoga style pants, I probably wouldn't give a second look. That's fairly close to what I change into to get my morning coffee.

This has been a good discussion, I hope it doesn't deteriorate to assumed distinctions between finances and class.

 

[jjohnson]

I've been trying to find my concierge information, but I'm almost positive that mixed in with our welcome package was a request that "proper attire" be worn in the concierge lounge. I agree that some pj's cover up more than what others consider clothing and is a t-shirt with vulgarity on it better than a robe? That's why I think all that is needed is the term "proper".

By definition, it's:

1. Characterized by appropriateness or suitability; fitting: the proper knife for cutting bread; not a proper moment for a joke.
2. Called for by rules or conventions; correct: the proper form for a business letter.
3. Strictly following rules or conventions, especially in social behavior; seemly: a proper lady; a proper gentleman.

I just pulled out my welcome packet from my stay at Polynesian concierge. In their welcome letter it states:

"When visiting the lounge, may we suggest footwear and cover-ups for swim wear"

Luckily, when we stayed at Polynesian and Beach Club I didn't observe anyone dressed in PJ's, robes, or bathing suits.

 

[lisadam]

I've read through the whole thread. I honestly don't mind what people wear in the CL - I am always more appalled at the way people behave.

MY last 3 CL stays have been at the WL - and I haven't been there since January - but I will close my eyes and imagine the following three groups on the balcony on the 7th floor overlooking the beautiful WL lobby

1. a quiet family with - two parents with two kids in their pjs eating at a table on the balcony overlooking the lobby - and

2. a well-dressed family touching all the food - chewing some while still hovering over the table

or

3. an inbetween dressed (whatever that is - bear with me) family being incredibly loud and dropping food all over

I'd choose the quiet family with the pjs

Now - I've never gone out to the lounge in my pjs - I have only gone to the CL in what is considered "outside" clothes - but those have often included a pair of comfy shorts and a cotten t-shirt - which aren't too different than pjs - I will admit to having brought my young son with me for a cookie and a glass of milk before bed in his Disney PJS and mickey mouse slippers

I've always valued behavior more than appearance

 

[TammiMcMan]

I've always valued behavior more than appearance

I hear you Lisa, but it would be nice to have both.

 

[lisadam]

I hear you Lisa, but it would be nice to have both.

True...

I just hope there are never any "hair" standards - Florida makes me frizz up and there is NOTHING that helps

LOL!

 

[minnie61650]

And I guess those of us that do not think wearing pjs is right in a public place were obviously raised differently. Wearing a strange outfit that doesn't suit ones taste is totally different then coming out into public in pjs. This is one of the main reasons I don't do WDW concierge. It seems that there are too many that do not know how one is supposed to act at them. Thankfully the concierges we stay at other places have a totally different class of people. And I don't mean financially different.

ITA

I think for a lot of WDW guests this is their first experience using concierge.Since they see other WDW guests wearing PJ's or robes they think
it is accceptable. Kinda like wearing Flip Flops when invited to a dinner at the White House with the President!
No flames please. JMHO.
Guess you can tell I'm over 50.
Linda

 

[maryliz]

Kinda like wearing Flip Flops when invited to a dinner at the White House with the President!
No flames please. JMHO.
Guess you can tell I'm over 50.
Linda

So a family vacation at a family-oriented resort ... but if you pay for concierge, you're at the same level as someone who has been invited to the White House

And ITA with your "No flames please. JMHO." I believe I stated a couple of pages ago that it was "JMHO". Good thing I wear my flame-retardant suit when on the Boards.

I think lisadam said it best: I've always valued behavior more than appearance

I think this has been a fun discussion ... and enlightening !

Have a great long weekend, everyone. We're preparing for back-to-school here so it will be a busy one.

MaryLiz

 

[A Mickeyfan]

I totally agree that bare feet is unacceptable ... it's a health and safety issue. As for the PJ's, I think there's a big difference between walking down the hall from my room in my jammies to get a cup of tea,versus going outside getting in my car and driving to the donut shop and going in. That's JMHO. I'm just curious why anyone really cares what someone else is wearing? As long as I'm not showing "parts that shouldn't be seen", why do you care? It's not hurting you. Maybe you think it's tacky, but who cares ... I see lots more tacky things that go on in public places, and as long as they're not directly affecting me, I don't give it another thought. Lots of clothes out there are more revealing than my jammies.

I guess I just don't see what all the fuss is about.
MaryLiz

I have to agree with you. I have run to lounge in my pj's with flip flop on's to grab a cup of coffee. My pj's are Disney & some of them actually look like short sets . Now had I been one to wear a see through nightty...that would be a different story... I would never do that. I am also one that wears a cover up to & from the pool. As a matter of fact, the cover up I have is a satin type night dress (not long & not a shirt) that came from the Disney Store....so I guess I do wear my PJ's out
If you were to take my pj's & put them near some of the shirts & shorts that are real clothing..... mine have more to them, not see thru & definatly longer...no Daisy Dukes ..thank you...
On the same token, I don't wish to see one how bares all in the lounge. I would rather see someone in pj's that cover you up than a bathing suite where they are hanging out...

 

[A Mickeyfan]

I've read through the whole thread. I honestly don't mind what people wear in the CL - I am always more appalled at the way people behave.

MY last 3 CL stays have been at the WL - and I haven't been there since January - but I will close my eyes and imagine the following three groups on the balcony on the 7th floor overlooking the beautiful WL lobby

1. a quiet family with - two parents with two kids in their pjs eating at a table on the balcony overlooking the lobby - and

2. a well-dressed family touching all the food - chewing some while still hovering over the table

or

3. an inbetween dressed (whatever that is - bear with me) family being incredibly loud and dropping food all over

I'd choose the quiet family with the pjs

Now - I've never gone out to the lounge in my pjs - I have only gone to the CL in what is considered "outside" clothes - but those have often included a pair of comfy shorts and a cotten t-shirt - which aren't too different than pjs - I will admit to having brought my young son with me for a cookie and a glass of milk before bed in his Disney PJS and mickey mouse slippers

I've always valued behavior more than appearance

I too would take that quiet family in the pj's. At least they wouldn't be touching my food or talking so loud that I can't hear my own conversation going on

 

[A Mickeyfan]

ITA

I think for a lot of WDW guests this is their first experience using concierge.Since they see other WDW guests wearing PJ's or robes they think
it is accceptable. Kinda like wearing Flip Flops when invited to a dinner at the White House with the President!
No flames please. JMHO.
Guess you can tell I'm over 50.
Linda

Hey... have you seen some of the flip flops that are out now?? Not just like when we were younger. Some of them are as nice as "formal shoes". Some of them are Silver with heels & rhinestone studded, or with a flower in between the toe area. My daugher is the flip flop queen. She has a pair in every color to match her outfits. She has some with heels & some regular beach type...but they are both flip flops ...

 

[shellybaxter]

To make your point, if the child care center does not allow shoes in certain rooms, I would respect that, even though I'm not comfortable being barefoot. I don't look upon that as your child care company being intolerant of my beliefs or norm. I look at it as following a rule. Why is that so different from asking someone who normally goes barefoot to wear shoes in a public place?

For me the difference is that there is a reason. Those who wear shoes in from outside bring things in that babies and toddlers put in there mouths. That is a legitimate, concrete reason for a rule. I guess thats what I don't understand. I don't get the concrete reason for the must wear shoes rule. It seems more like a judgemental rule, based on someones idea of social behavior, then a health and safety rule.

However, its been pointed out that it is a rule and I will follow it. I just don't understand it. And I do believe that some of the posts on this thread seem intorerant of different views of correct social behavior.

Shelly

 

[minnie61650]

Hey... have you seen some of the flip flops that are out now?? Not just like when we were younger. Some of them are as nice as "formal shoes". Some of them are Silver with heels & rhinestone studded, or with a flower in between the toe area. My daugher is the flip flop queen. She has a pair in every color to match her outfits. She has some with heels & some regular beach type...but they are both flip flops ...

Yep, I have seen those flip flops and my daughter wears them also. I think they are quite stylish and I really like them. They are fine for casual wear and even dinner at a nice restaurant. I just think there is proper attire and there is inappropriate attire. Robes and barefeet and most PJ's are not appropriate
at most resturants.
If a man in just his PJ's, his lounging shorts or robe and underwear or a woman in a robe with just undies, a nightie or baby dolls were to come into the lounge then that would make me uncomfortable. So think before you come to the lounge.
I apologize and I am sorry if I offended anyone. I did not mean to flame anyone. Perhaps your idea of PJ's and my idea might be totally different. If you have PJ's that also function as clothing then they are fine. "Be my Guest"

Linda