• !$xf.visitor.user_id

SDMT: CM measured child before giving rider switch

Rider swap is similar to the DAS, in that it's only an advantage when you don't truly need it. When you do truly need it (a too short child), it just equalizes things a bit more. Now, do I think Disney owes it to me to make things easier for me because I have a toddler? Of course not, but it's nice it's there.

Take Epcot for example, when FP+ and RS are used together to get around the tiers. Family A has 2 adults and a toddler. Family B has 2 adults and a 10 year old. Family a has 1 FP+ for each Soarin' and TT. Family B has all 3 of their tier 1 choices at Soarin'. Family A goes to the entrance of Soarin, Dad uses FP, Mom gets swap. Dad waits about 20-30 mins to ride. Next they repeat at TT, mom waits 20-30 mins to ride. At some point in the day they use their rider swap passes, waiting about the same for each to ride. That's 80-120 minutes of wait times. Family B uses their FP to ride Soarin'. 20-30 minute wait. They then use the TT standby line, when we went in February it was around 60-80 minutes at the worst parts of the day. That's a 80-110 minute wait for them, but much less if they do TT at rope drop. All that is also ignoring the 4th FP.

So what does that show? Having to send 2 groups through the line tends to suck up so much time it negates any advantage RS provides. And that's the point, the advantage is only there when you don't have to split off to begin with.

Exactly :thumbsup2 Yes you can get some extra FP+ but it takes so much time to use them (and many times we don't because the little one is DONE at that point) that it doesn't really give much if any advantage.

There are so many things we can't do with a toddler. We can't eat at signature restaurants, we can't stay for the EMH in the PM, we usually need a long afternoon break for a nap etc. So honestly, it ALL evens out in the end.

I don't see how anyone sees it as an entitlement just to be travelling with a young child :confused3 I do see how it can be seen as an entitlement if you are travelling with a much older child and using the strategy to "scam" the system.

My kids are 6.5 years apart and the oldest is very tall. So we had quite a few years where we didn't need to do child swap before the youngest was born. Yes, we get a few extra FP's on our trips now, but I can 100% assure you we much prefer not needing to do the child swap and riding together. It was soooooo much easier and less time consuming and I usually end up skipping a lot of the rides since I usually am the one waiting the first time with DS2.
 
I guess I just never really saw rider swap as some big inconvenience. At least not "get extra fast passes for this inconvenience" kind of inconvenience. If I'm at the park with my child, I know that things will be different that when it is just my husband and me. We will go slower. We won't ride the same rides we would if it was just the two of us. We won't be riding things together. We will change where we eat. But, I'm a parent. That's just a fact of life. I don't think that entitles me to extra fast passes and I do still see it as gaming the system and gaining an unfair advantage. Everyone should have 3. No reason that I should have more than a person who doesn't have children.
 
Rider swap is similar to the DAS, in that it's only an advantage when you don't truly need it. When you do truly need it (a too short child), it just equalizes things a bit more. Now, do I think Disney owes it to me to make things easier for me because I have a toddler? Of course not, but it's nice it's there.

Take Epcot for example, when FP+ and RS are used together to get around the tiers. Family A has 2 adults and a toddler. Family B has 2 adults and a 10 year old. Family a has 1 FP+ for each Soarin' and TT. Family B has all 3 of their tier 1 choices at Soarin'. Family A goes to the entrance of Soarin, Dad uses FP, Mom gets swap. Dad waits about 20-30 mins to ride. Next they repeat at TT, mom waits 20-30 mins to ride. At some point in the day they use their rider swap passes, waiting about the same for each to ride. That's 80-120 minutes of wait times. Family B uses their FP to ride Soarin'. 20-30 minute wait. They then use the TT standby line, when we went in February it was around 60-80 minutes at the worst parts of the day. That's a 80-110 minute wait for them, but much less if they do TT at rope drop. All that is also ignoring the 4th FP.

So what does that show? Having to send 2 groups through the line tends to suck up so much time it negates any advantage RS provides. And that's the point, the advantage is only there when you don't have to split off to begin with.

Still, family C can't get FP+ for Soarin' and TT, so they are screwed. The numbers only begin to even out at all on really long rides where both lpeople ride separately. Of course you chose Soarin' as your basis, since it's probably the longest ride in all of WDW with a height requirement. Use Dwarf Hill as your basis, and what you are doing has a MASSIVE time advantage.

Plus, the folks on here were talking that Family A would allow Family B to ride on their RS pass too! Then vice versa. That way They get double rides. All while family C is still in the SB line for TT.

You can try to twist this all you want. But, if people are riding a ride, getting on it in via the FP line WITHOUT them ever having a FP for that ride, you are gaming the system. ESPECIALLY with FP+ limits. And you are no better than the fake handicapped folks.

It's really that simple.

-Jason
 
If everyone has to have a FP+ for the ride, it negates the need of the Rider Swap. Because all that does is send you back through the FP line. But beyond that, you seem to be forgetting the too-short kid in the mix because you are so worried that someone might get an 'extra' you are not getting. We follow the rules, and yes, we use the RS to our 'advantage' as you want to call it. DH and DS 12 and 7 have FP+ for Dinosaur in AK. They have two FP+ left for the day, and I have 3. We do a swap and the older boys get to ride again with me. I use one of my FP+ selections for the Mickey and Minnie meet and greet to take the baby. We all have 2 FP+ left, and at the end of the day I have a great picture of the baby with some characters that my other children missed out on because I feel that even at 2, the youngest should get something out of the trip than a sore behind from sitting in a stroller all day. We all use a FP+ for the Safari, leaving us with 1 FP+ left. I like EE, my oldest LOVES EE, the 7 year old is still too short for EE and DH doesn't really care for EE. I get a FP+ for EE for myself and DS 12 and we use rider swap. DS12 gets to ride it twice. DH and DS7 get a FP+ for the Rapids. Again, nothing for the youngest to do but sit and wait...notice how we are NEVER all together (except on the safari)?

Our FAMILY vacations have become a logistical nightmare to try to make everyone happy. Now we have to worry about not offending others because of the perceived 'advantage' of a system that Disney has offered for years? I've NEVER been able to enjoy a height restricted ride with my DH, something that I look very forward to being able to do one day. Until then, we separate, go our own way, miss many memories as a FAMILY and then get the stink eye for knowing how to use what is given to us. Well, that just sucks.
 

This seems to be one of your hot buttons Jason. Have you ever needed to use a Child Swap pass?
 
I guess I just never really saw rider swap as some big inconvenience. At least not "get extra fast passes for this inconvenience" kind of inconvenience. If I'm at the park with my child, I know that things will be different that when it is just my husband and me. We will go slower. We won't ride the same rides we would if it was just the two of us. We won't be riding things together. We will change where we eat. But, I'm a parent. That's just a fact of life. I don't think that entitles me to extra fast passes and I do still see it as gaming the system and gaining an unfair advantage. Everyone should have 3. No reason that I should have more than a person who doesn't have children.

Nobody said you should get extra fast passes for the inconvenience. What most people are saying is by using the system as it is allowed (getting a RS when you enter the FP line, it's always been allowed even under FP-), families with children who are too short to ride still aren't getting an advantage like you and others have claimed. It evens things out, because everything with a height restriction has to be done twice.

Like I said clearly in my first post, I do not feel like I'm entitled to extra FP. I do feel like I am completely in the right to use the system as it allows me to. And for the record, we never used RS to get around the tiers, or really much at all. With Epcot, we just used single rider at TT, and most other places the adult who sat out just skipped the ride.

Finally, there is not a hard limit of 3 anymore, so everybody doesn't have 3 anyways.

Still, family C can't get FP+ for Soarin' and TT, so they are screwed. The numbers only begin to even out at all on really long rides where both lpeople ride separately. Of course you chose Soarin' as your basis, since it's probably the longest ride in all of WDW with a height requirement. Use Dwarf Hill as your basis, and what you are doing has a MASSIVE time advantage.

Plus, the folks on here were talking that Family A would allow Family B to ride on their RS pass too! Then vice versa. That way They get double rides. All while family C is still in the SB line for TT.

You can try to twist this all you want. But, if people are riding a ride, getting on it in via the FP line WITHOUT them ever having a FP for that ride, you are gaming the system. ESPECIALLY with FP+ limits. And you are no better than the fake handicapped folks.

It's really that simple.

-Jason

Who is family C? The family who doesn't use any FP because why..? That would be family C's fault.

Most discussions surrounding using RS to someone's "advantage" surround the tiers, so yes, that is what I chose. When you start talking about using RS at MK, you have a completely different situation from Epcot which is why I didn't choose it. Slightly less waiting in the FP lines, but also much more availability for the 4th rotating FP, which makes the RS less of an "advantage", as everybody has the ability to get more. Also, the headliners at MK usually have less of a stand by wait time compared to the tiered parks, so family B's wait time (the ones without a short child) is significantly decreased as well. Where family B has to wait 60 minutes to ride TT, they might only be waiting 40 for a mountain in MK.

I don't know where you're going with Family A sharing with Family B and whatever you said. Why and how would one share with another?

Anyways, I'm not the one twisting things here. I'm discussing my own experiences with a toddler and why RS is not the advantage you're making it out to be when used properly. When you start talking about families who lie about needing them, sneak into lines, and all that kind of stuff, that's where you find families with advantages, because they did not truly need it. That's where I find similarities to the DAS. If a family with no members with a disability used it, they would probably think it was pretty great.
 
This seems to be one of your hot buttons Jason. Have you ever needed to use a Child Swap pass?

I'm wondering that too, since most who have toured with a small child realize that touring with them and using RS does not compare to touring without them and not using RS.
 
If everyone has to have a FP+ for the ride, it negates the need of the Rider Swap. Because all that does is send you back through the FP line. But beyond that, you seem to be forgetting the too-short kid in the mix because you are so worried that someone might get an 'extra' you are not getting. We follow the rules, and yes, we use the RS to our 'advantage' as you want to call it. DH and DS 12 and 7 have FP+ for Dinosaur in AK. They have two FP+ left for the day, and I have 3. We do a swap and the older boys get to ride again with me. I use one of my FP+ selections for the Mickey and Minnie meet and greet to take the baby. We all have 2 FP+ left, and at the end of the day I have a great picture of the baby with some characters that my other children missed out on because I feel that even at 2, the youngest should get something out of the trip than a sore behind from sitting in a stroller all day. We all use a FP+ for the Safari, leaving us with 1 FP+ left. I like EE, my oldest LOVES EE, the 7 year old is still too short for EE and DH doesn't really care for EE. I get a FP+ for EE for myself and DS 12 and we use rider swap. DS12 gets to ride it twice. DH and DS7 get a FP+ for the Rapids. Again, nothing for the youngest to do but sit and wait...notice how we are NEVER all together (except on the safari)?

Our FAMILY vacations have become a logistical nightmare to try to make everyone happy. Now we have to worry about not offending others because of the perceived 'advantage' of a system that Disney has offered for years? I've NEVER been able to enjoy a height restricted ride with my DH, something that I look very forward to being able to do one day. Until then, we separate, go our own way, miss many memories as a FAMILY and then get the stink eye for knowing how to use what is given to us. Well, that just sucks.

I'm not offended. And I don't think you are violating the rules. Yes, I do think you are getting an advantage. I'd be willing to bet you think it's an advantage, as well, or you wouldn't see a need to do this. But that's neither here not here. No one is giving you the stink eye. No one thinks you are doing something you shouldn't based on Disney's policy. I just think it's a bad policy and do think that it gives some people an advantage. You change how you do things when you have kids. That's a given. I don't think that a policy that gives you extra fast passes is really in order. But, I guess it is the policy.
 
Nobody said you should get extra fast passes for the inconvenience. What most people are saying is by using the system as it is allowed (getting a RS when you enter the FP line, it's always been allowed even under FP-), families with children who are too short to ride still aren't getting an advantage like you and others have claimed. It evens things out, because everything with a height restriction has to be done twice.

Like I said clearly in my first post, I do not feel like I'm entitled to extra FP. I do feel like I am completely in the right to use the system as it allows me to. And for the record, we never used RS to get around the tiers, or really much at all. With Epcot, we just used single rider at TT, and most other places the adult who sat out just skipped the ride.

Finally, there is not a hard limit of 3 anymore, so everybody doesn't have 3 anyways.



Who is family C? The family who doesn't use any FP because why..? That would be family C's fault.

Most discussions surrounding using RS to someone's "advantage" surround the tiers, so yes, that is what I chose. When you start talking about using RS at MK, you have a completely different situation from Epcot which is why I didn't choose it. Slightly less waiting in the FP lines, but also much more availability for the 4th rotating FP, which makes the RS less of an "advantage", as everybody has the ability to get more. Also, the headliners at MK usually have less of a stand by wait time compared to the tiered parks, so family B's wait time (the ones without a short child) is significantly decreased as well. Where family B has to wait 60 minutes to ride TT, they might only be waiting 40 for a mountain in MK.

I don't know where you're going with Family A sharing with Family B and whatever you said. Why and how would one share with another?

Anyways, I'm not the one twisting things here. I'm discussing my own experiences with a toddler and why RS is not the advantage you're making it out to be when used properly. When you start talking about families who lie about needing them, sneak into lines, and all that kind of stuff, that's where you find families with advantages, because they did not truly need it. That's where I find similarities to the DAS. If a family with no members with a disability used it, they would probably think it was pretty great.

Family C is the family dealing with Tiers, so they have to choose between TT and Soarin'.

Having to go through FP twice, instead of SB once is a HUGE advantage. And then being able to use one FP+ for two adults is a HUGE advantage.

Family A and B sharing is what some one here have said they do. Since an RS swap is good for 3 people, those 3 don't need FP+ to enjoy FP for that ride. Two families each with a single small child visiting together can share RS passes and get 4 FP+ rides with each adult only using one true FP+. You can't see that as a problem?

To say that it's not a big deal because no one is limited to 3 anymore is really trying to spin your abuse.

-Jason
 
This seems to be one of your hot buttons Jason. Have you ever needed to use a Child Swap pass?

I have baby swapped. I would wait in line, ride, then my wife would go ride as I watched our son.

I thought I recalled them requiring us both to have an FP to do this. Granted, it was over 10 years ago. But this current system is just as much abusive, if not moreso, than GAC pass abuse. The fact that many people are trying to argue that it isn't abuse for Two parents riding a ride using only 1 FP+, then going to another ride, using the other parent's FP+ for them both to ride another ride is just crazy.

Is Disney allowing you to do this? Yep, sure are. Did Disney allow 14 year old kids to fake injuries so they, and their 5 friends could skip lines all day with a GAC? Yep, they did, until they finally stopped it.

-Jaosn
 
I'm wondering that too, since most who have toured with a small child realize that touring with them and using RS does not compare to touring without them and not using RS.

And that is your choice, and was my choice, to be a parent. Disney should not create a rule to give you special priveleges while you have a small child.

You ignored my questions of where it should end. Small children can't see well in crowds, so should you get preferred seating at shows, parades, and fireworks? Of course not, that's just part of having a small child.

With FP+ severely limiting access to good rides during crowded times, abusing the RS pass to double your FP+ rides is just that, abuse. Just like all the GAC abuse that used to happen.

Just man/woman up to the fact you are abusing a system to your benefit. Disney is letting you. But your abuse is making other people wait longer than they should, because they aren't abusing the system.

-Jason
 
I have baby swapped. I would wait in line, ride, then my wife would go ride as I watched our son.

I thought I recalled them requiring us both to have an FP to do this. Granted, it was over 10 years ago. But this current system is just as much abusive, if not moreso, than GAC pass abuse. The fact that many people are trying to argue that it isn't abuse for Two parents riding a ride using only 1 FP+, then going to another ride, using the other parent's FP+ for them both to ride another ride is just crazy.

Is Disney allowing you to do this? Yep, sure are. Did Disney allow 14 year old kids to fake injuries so they, and their 5 friends could skip lines all day with a GAC? Yep, they did, until they finally stopped it.

-Jaosn
I'm sorry you didn't understand the system 10 years ago since it was the same as it was 14 years ago when I first started using it and the same system that is in place now. You receive a child swap pass from the CM at the front of the line and it didn't matter if it in the FP line or the standby line. YOU chose to use your FPs that way, and now you're mad at others who use the child swap pass instead of a FP. We get it. But making hyperbolic comparisons to make your point just erodes your argument.
 
It was always my impression that child swap was to accommodate families with babies and toddlers. Not families with older kids who just didn't want to ride for whatever reason.
 
I'm sorry you didn't understand the system 10 year ago since it was the same as it was 14 years ago when I first started using it and the same system that is in place now. You receive a child swap pass from the CM at the front of the line and it didn't matter if it in the FP line or the standby line. YOU chose to use your FPs that way, and now you're mad at others who use the child swap pass instead of a FP. We get it. But making hyperbolic comparisons to make your point just erodes your argument.

There is nothing hyperbolic about it. I am sure the average person would assume all RS folks needed an FP, if they were all entering the FP line. That's a pretty reasonable assumption. I don't recall the details of my experience. And in all honesty, in the FP- days, I knew all the ways to get lots of FPs, so it didn't matter. Disney wasn't socializing my rides yet.

However, the change to FP+ makes a MASSIVE change to the advantage you get by not all having FP+ when you all get on through the FP+ line. And to not see that is really just trying to ignore the facts, because you know you are abusing the system, but just want to convince yourself otherwise.

You can argue all day that two waits through FP+ is worse than one through SB. Or that 2xFP+ is deserved because you have a young child. It doesn't change the fact that you feel you deserve more than all the guests who don't have small children. It's the typical entitlement philosophy.

I'm sure the people who got GACs because their feet hurt a little had similar justification thoughts going through their heads. They felt Disney owed them more rides because their personal reality gave them a disadvantage with respect to the other park goers. Did you like all the folks that abused GAC?

My wife has a medical problem where she needs to visit the restroom more than your average person. Should I get a special FP+ to compensate my family for this physical problem? Of course not, and to think that would be absolutely crazy.

-Jason
 
Just checked the WDW website. It doesn't say the child must be under the height limit. It says either too small or do not want to ride. Wonder if they're changing it. "If Guests in your party don’t want to board an attraction, you don’t have to miss out. One adult can wait with the non-rider while the rest of the party experiences the attraction. The waiting adult can then board the attraction without having to wait in the regular line again when another adult in the party returns to supervise the child or children who do not ride—either because they do not meet the height requirement or simply do not wish to ride."

If they are changing it, it is a second change in the last year or two, because it used to say ONLY too small. Nothing whatsoever about not wanting to ride. When the site changed, when they started messing with the site around December 2012, it was at some point in 2013 that the wording changed,

The issue is that the CMs have only been trained on the "too small" use of rider switch.

So if it's changing, they are going back to the way it was from at least the time that I joined this site and started reading about it.

Rider Swap is for families with children that are to short to ride not children that don't want to ride. Where would you draw the line if it didn't matter if the were tall enough 10yo, 12yo, 18yo? The system would be abused if they let anyone that didn't want to ride get a rider swap.

It that is what it is for, their official information needs to reflect that. Official info is how a company disseminates info to their customers, and their official info does not say what you said.


Since FP started and they changed from the actual rider switch at the exit to the rider swap pass I have never ever been able to get a RS pass for a child who is tall enough to ride but doesn't want to. ...... again despite what the website says actual experience of this is rare.

I agree. But their site has said this for at least a year. Anyone wanting to use it should insist on their official rules being followed OR officially changed.


Now I am so confused. I asked this question on another thread and was told that not all people had to have the FP. I thought it seemed like people with small kids were getting an advantage (my kid is 4 so I liked this ;) ) but was told that it was ok.

I'm confused too because as long as I have been reading these boards, there has been a difference in the use of FP and rider switch between wdw and dlr. at dlr you didn't/don't need FPs for the second group of riders, for WDW, you have needed them.

If this isn't true, it's a change, and I believe it's a change since FP+ if indeed it is that way. We haven't used rider switch at WDW because by the time we went DS was big enough for everything, but it was part of my constant, ongoing, research.



I don't think this is just for rider swap. We were there last week (5/30) and found the CM at the 7DMT to be particularly strict and downright rude. Our family had fastpasses, but when we arrived to the attraction it was down due to a technical problem. At that time the CM at 7DMT told us we could come back anytime that day and they would honor our fastpasses. OK, great, right? Seemed simple enough. Well. when we came back to ride the CM there at that time was quite curt and said NO. I was rather ticked, as our whole family of 6 originally built our entire day around riding the mine train. It wasn't our fault it wasn't working during our fastpass window! I had even seen on my iPhone & MDX app that I had a "bonus fastpass" for up to 6 people issued to me sometime during that day (I'd NEVER seen or heard of this before-surprised to see.) I tried to tell the CM this. She made my family stand off to the side and then told me I had to bring it up on my phone and show her to prove it. My battery was running low by this time and I was trying to hurry before it died. Then she tried to argue with me about how many people it allowed--she didn't see where it read "for up to 6 people." My whole family almost lost our on our 7DMT ride even though we legitimately had fastpasses. Make sure you have your phones on and you Apps up on the screen to prove your case guys.


Definitely bring your mobile device. I still have a notification on MDE about a change to my barnstormer FP+ from our last trip.


If a child is tall enough for some attractions, you can do an internal rider switch with them. For the internal rider switch, everybody in your party goes through the queue and then at the load area, there is a bypass to the exit of the ride that the child not wanting to ride and an adult can go through and then wait at the exit. Once the party is done riding, the adults can switch off and up to three people (so the adult waiting and two others) can go back through without going through the queue again. They simply go back the way they came under the direction of the CM. I've seen this done at a couple of attractions, but I'm not sure if all attractions have an exit hallway or the internal rider switch option. You would think they would all have some sort of "chicken" exit. I think they have this system for children who are tall enough because it is faster for the family than having to go back in the queue (even the Fastpass queue). The rider switch card system works for kids who aren't tall enough to make sure the CM isn't held up checking heights when they are trying to load. It also makes sense to why rides without height restrictions don't have the rider switch cards. You could probably bring the child through and do an internal rider switch. Sometimes I wish WDW had a similar policy to Disneyland where the first part of the party going through the queue for the rider switch gets a card that they exchange for the rider switch ticket once they get to where they collect fastpasses in the line, because this would cut down on people scamming for rider switches and make it easier for guests actually needing them.

I have never once heard of this. From how you worded it I get yes mom pressing that you've only seen it and haven't been a part of it, I think you likely were seeing something like the way the GAC card or DAS was working for that family. Since so many rides board in entirely different places from where they offload, this wouldn't even be possible a lot of the time.


A few years back we used rider swap with my niece. She was def tall enough to ride EVERYTHING but too chicken. We were NEVER refused a Rider Swap. Guess it has changed.

Changed back. :)

I was just told myself when I was on the phone with the CM this weekend that what is supposed ot happen and what does varies. She said with most the newer rides, the cast members are following the rules. I said my son is tall enough and just doesn't care for them but too young to wait by himself. She said that the swap only applys to infants. That I would need to get a FP for him too even if he doesn't want to ride because he is tall enough. I was like what? I wish it was black and white because now we have to just be safe and waste some of his fast passes because I can't have him waiting alone if they apply that rule to us. Blah

Remember that the CMs who answer the phone are offsite, most likely out of state, might never have been to or worked in the parks, and do NOT necessarily know how things work in the parks, just her use of the word infants tells me she doesn't know what she is talking about,


I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you on this! We went in May with DS2, who was only 36". At WDW using the RS was great because we could get the RS pass and then go off to a play area or ride that he could enjoy while one of us could ride, then switch off (or use whenever it was convenient- even different days!). At UO, we used baby swap at Transformers and Spiderman. He had to wait in the standby line with us then at the end of the line wait in their baby swap area. He was (somewhat) disappointed that he didn't get to ride, plus there's not much to do in the waiting areas. It's not a huge deal and he was ok with not riding, but I would have much preferred being able to take him to do something he could actually enjoy rather than making him wait in a long, hot line for nothing. Again, not bashing Universal's rules, but saying their baby swap "blows Disney out of the water" is totally off IMO. :goodvibes

On the other hand, your family didn't
T have to split up for the entire length of the queue and ride. You got to spend that time together. And that is why many people appreciate universal's situation vs disney's. For us it wouldn't work either, because the rides have queues that would have freaked out my son. He is coming up on 5 feet, is 10, and won't go near the entrance to The Mummy because it freaks him out. For the rides he would want to go on, it would have upset him to see the lines without being able to ride. Doesn't work for your family or mine, but for most people who comment on it, it absolutely does blow wdw's away.


There is a difference between a Rider Switch Pass and a Child Swap. With a Rider Switch Pass the child is too small and the adults swap outside the ride. With a Child Swap the child is tall enough but too chicken and the adults swap at the front of the ride inside the ride. Disney's policy that you copied combines the two into one policy.

I rarely disagree with you Robin, but I do here. IMO the only way there are separate things is in the wording people use.


I agree with this. We are going in a week and a half and my 3 year old son will miss the 40" rides by less than an inch. :-( I'm a Disney specialist travel agent and my boys live and breathe WDW every day around my house because of what I do. All my 3 year old talks about is riding Star Tours and Test Track and he won't be able to do it this trip. Sure, the other two will get to ride those rides twice, but dealing with the rider switch takes a lot of time and we'd much rather be able to ride all together as a family and be done with each ride with one ride through. Truth be told, what I'm REALLY looking forward to is next summer (2015) when my 13 year old will be 14 and old enough to ride with the (then) 4 year old and my 6 year old will be 7 and old enough to sit by himself. That means that my husband and I will actually be able to sit next to each other on a thrill ride (as mild as some of them at WDW may be). That hasn't happened in almost 15 years, LOL! -Astrid

Are you talking about exactly where the kids sit while the whole family is on a ride? Have you ever gotten to the seating area and not been allowed to be seated? As far as I know it's rides where you are out of of sight of the older people that have limits on where younger kids can be seated. So on TSMM you have to have a 14+ With the younger but you could have an 11 year old sit with the younger on BTMRR while the adults sit in the car behind.


I also think that the perceived rider switch "advantage" for too small children (and again I don't think it is much of an advantage) is that it is only for a FINITE period of time. Basically those couple of years until the child is big enough to do the rides. I think that a majority of families would much prefer riding together than splitting up constantly with a too small child. With an adult that doesn't want to ride, that can go on indefinitely....and as other posters have pointed out, there are plenty of non-riding activities an adult can engage in that a child just cannot.

Agreed.

If you think that rider swap is really this huge advantage then you either haven't travelled to WDW with small children or have the best behaved and most patient babies and toddlers ever. Rider swap was nice for some rides but the reality is that I rarely got to use my rider swaps because the littles had enough waiting by the time my DH and the older kids were done. I have a stack of old FPs and rider swap passes at home from our trips that I never got to use because the kids were done waiting.

Agreed. I hated the rider switch days. Poor DS having to be entertained two separate times each time his parents wanted to ride big ride. We rarely did it.

Agreed. We don't use RS but if I did, you'd bet that I'd walk around with a printed version of that, and make an issue of it. That's ridiculous that they're going to measure a child in a stroller. I mean, I can see if I'm walking up with a teenager on a new ride, but even still, their written policy as it stands now says if you don't want to ride, you can use RS. They need to change it if that's what they're gonna do.

Absolutely. If I were in need of the policy, I would print it out I would travel with a charged mobile device with the page bookmarked, and that would be shown to anyone necessary to have their official policy followed.
 
There is nothing hyperbolic about it. I am sure the average person would assume all RS folks needed an FP, if they were all entering the FP line. That's a pretty reasonable assumption. I don't recall the details of my experience. And in all honesty, in the FP- days, I knew all the ways to get lots of FPs, so it didn't matter. Disney wasn't socializing my rides yet.

However, the change to FP+ makes a MASSIVE change to the advantage you get by not all having FP+ when you all get on through the FP+ line. And to not see that is really just trying to ignore the facts, because you know you are abusing the system, but just want to convince yourself otherwise.

You can argue all day that two waits through FP+ is worse than one through SB. Or that 2xFP+ is deserved because you have a young child. It doesn't change the fact that you feel you deserve more than all the guests who don't have small children. It's the typical entitlement philosophy.

I'm sure the people who got GACs because their feet hurt a little had similar justification thoughts going through their heads. They felt Disney owed them more rides because their personal reality gave them a disadvantage with respect to the other park goers. Did you like all the folks that abused GAC?

My wife has a medical problem where she needs to visit the restroom more than your average person. Should I get a special FP+ to compensate my family for this physical problem? Of course not, and to think that would be absolutely crazy.

-Jason

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/hyperbole
hy·per·bo·le

[hahy-pur-buh-lee] Show IPA
noun Rhetoric . 1. obvious and intentional exaggeration.

2. an extravagant statement or figure of speech not intended to be taken literally, as “to wait an eternity.”
 
When I first started researching WDW a couple of years ago, I thought that I read that you could do baby/child swap by having everyone wait in line, one adult stay with the child when it came time to board, then have that person ride when everyone else finished the ride. It sounds like at least some who have posted here experienced that; can we still do it? My kids are pretty young (but tall) and they have already told me they are not riding anything "fast" at WDW. (As in, the carousel is sort of a thrill-ride for them. They are not thrill-seekers.:)) I would rather us all wait together in line rather than have my husband and I be separated during the wait. If we had to do that, we would probably end up skipping the ride altogether.

Sorry if this has been explained already; having not been to Disney with kids or FP+, I got a little cross-eyed trying to figure out some of the earlier rider-swap explanations and examples.
 
When I first started researching WDW a couple of years ago, I thought that I read that you could do baby/child swap by having everyone wait in line, one adult stay with the child when it came time to board, then have that person ride when everyone else finished the ride. It sounds like at least some who have posted here experienced that; can we still do it? My kids are pretty young (but tall) and they have already told me they are not riding anything "fast" at WDW. (As in, the carousel is sort of a thrill-ride for them. They are not thrill-seekers.:)) I would rather us all wait together in line rather than have my husband and I be separated during the wait. If we had to do that, we would probably end up skipping the ride altogether.

Yes- this is an internal ride switch. If you all plan on waiting in a FP line though, everyone will need fast passes. Just ask the CM, where you should stand to wait and swap. No one is going to force a scared kid onto a ride. It might be a bit of a problem on rides that you don't enter and exit in the same place, because you can't just walk over the ride vehicle, but you can ask a CM what you should do before you enter the ride.

What is being discussed is a rider swap pass. This MUST be used when someone is too short to wait in line (because they cannot be admitted to the line) and often for tall enough but too scared kids. In this case, they don't wait in the line, and when the swap occurs some of the people who rode the first time can ride again with the person who is switching out (so say Mom stays with Baby, while Dad goes with kid. When Mom rides, kid can ride again.)
 
Yes- this is an internal ride switch. If you all plan on waiting in a FP line though, everyone will need fast passes. Just ask the CM, where you should stand to wait and swap. No one is going to force a scared kid onto a ride. It might be a bit of a problem on rides that you don't enter and exit in the same place, because you can't just walk over the ride vehicle, but you can ask a CM what you should do before you enter the ride.

What is being discussed is a rider swap pass. This MUST be used when someone is too short to wait in line (because they cannot be admitted to the line) and often for tall enough but too scared kids. In this case, they don't wait in the line, and when the swap occurs some of the people who rode the first time can ride again with the person who is switching out (so say Mom stays with Baby, while Dad goes with kid. When Mom rides, kid can ride again.)

That makes sense. Thank you for the clarification. I see now how the need for a fastpass would add a wrinkle to it. How long (generally) is the wait for the fastpass line? For example, if my husband and I both wanted to ride a ride that our kids are frightened of, and it is one that we should fastpass, would we save time by using the rider swap in conjunction with a fastpass?

Again, I apologize if this has already been covered. Having not done it before, it is all a little abstract to me.
 
That makes sense. Thank you for the clarification. I see now how the need for a fastpass would add a wrinkle to it. How long (generally) is the wait for the fastpass line? For example, if my husband and I both wanted to ride a ride that our kids are frightened of, and it is one that we should fastpass, would we save time by using the rider swap in conjunction with a fastpass?

Again, I apologize if this has already been covered. Having not done it before, it is all a little abstract to me.

If possible, it would be fastest for you both to enter the fast pass line with your child and just have the child not ride, rather than doing the child swap with the fast pass. This way, you are both waiting in the same line rather than waiting in line twice. But, as the previous poster said, this is difficult to do on some rides as you don't get on and off at the same location (Space Mountain and Rock n Roller Coaster are good examples of this). Does that make sense? And does it answer your question or was I misunderstanding?
 


Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE








DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest DIS Tiktok DIS Twitter

Back
Top Bottom