cabanafrau
DIS Legend
- Joined
- May 10, 2006
- Messages
- 15,764
I actually DO have a practical solution. Any gun owner, whose gun is used in the commission of this sort of tragic slaughter, should be held 100% legally and financially accountable. They should be forced to pay damages to any victims. This would very much encourage parents, for example, to keep guns safely locked where teenagers can't get at them. No excuses. No exceptions. If you choose to own such a weapon, the death and destructions wrought by the weapon is on you. Period.
Insurance companies should be allowed to inquire about gun ownership, and to charge you significantly higher premiums, should you choose to own a weapon.
These are PRACTICAL solutions that don't involve taking one gun away from anyone.
Another practical solution. Have a gun buy back program. You get a voucher good for paying for higher education or the cost of a private school education. Will we get them all? No, of course not. But, any reduction is better than none at all. And the last few of these shootings have been by legally obtained/owned weapons (not illegally obtained....those tend to be used in drug crimes, etc, not school shootings), so we've got to reduce the rate of such ownership OR make the penalty for failing to adequately secure such a weapon very high to make sure people handle their guns responsibly.
If we spent as much time and energy focusing on this problem as we do on "terrorists" (which are just not that much of a statistical threat) we'd be well on our way to solving it. But, we do NOTHING. Absolutely nothing. And, the slaughter continues.
With respect, your gun buy back program seems to open up a host of unintended consequences, as does your penalty to be enacted against gun owners whose weapons are co opted by those who wish to do harm. There's inherent danger in making a weapon of even greater value than currently exists in America. There are also limits with how secure anyone can make anything from thieves. It's entirely possible a legal gun owner could take every measure they know of to secure a weapon and have determined thieves figure out how to steal it anyway. Who's going to pay for the higher education and private school education vouchers in return for guns turned in? Isn't it entirely possible that idea creates tremendous incentive for thieves to break into homes, looking for weapons they can turn in? Oh, there will be a theft report and a paper trail indicating the gun is stolen, so the thief cannot get the voucher, right? So the only guns to be turned in will be those legally owned, criminals will of course decide it's in their best interest to keep theirs to do what criminals will do.
I'm not against people turning in their guns if they want to. I'm not even against gun buy backs. I just think we can't just pursue gun buy backs at any cost and unfairly burden legal and responsible gun owners to the point the right to legally own a firearm becomes a mockery.