gwynne
DIS Legend
- Joined
- Jan 1, 2012
- Messages
- 10,489
Only we can prevent shirtless bears. Shall we take up a collection?So the USDA can afford to outfit him in regulation pants and hat, but no shirt?
Only we can prevent shirtless bears. Shall we take up a collection?So the USDA can afford to outfit him in regulation pants and hat, but no shirt?
I always thought the choking hazard was the toy inside, not the yellow egg. Huh, learn something every day. Now, back to driving. Where am I going, by the way? All I know is Texas, so far..
Better not start the grill yet. She's dropping that hockey player off in Buffalo on the way. And you never know what can happen in Western New York.
Only we can prevent shirtless bears. Shall we take up a collection?
Those eggs are popular.I always thought the choking hazard was the toy inside, not the yellow egg. Huh, learn something every day. Now, back to driving. Where am I going, by the way? All I know is Texas, so far..
I'm not the OP, but most threads move in an organic way. This one was taken over by some when they decided to mock and berate the OP because they thought she was A) making up her question or B) being in some way "insensitive" to the BLM or should I say "overly" sensitive to the unrest in our world.
I have zero issues with threads moving along, but this was taken over in a most nonsensical way to shut it down. Whatever. I just don't like people shouting others down. It's rude, especially by people who claim to want all voices heard equally.
I always thought the choking hazard was the toy inside, not the yellow egg. Huh, learn something every day. Now, back to driving. Where am I going, by the way? All I know is Texas, so far..
Only we can prevent shirtless bears. Shall we take up a collection?
I think the regulation is that something inedible can't be completely encased in something edible.
The last time I found a surprise in my chocolate was a bad day indeed.
Yeah me too but obviously since that has been obviously avoided it ain't happening.I was really hoping for an answer to this one.
She was heard! I don't think anyone shouted OP down. We inquired and tried to gain perspective. Things didn't seem to add up, so more questions were asked. (Some of which she has yet to answer.)
Yes, it went silly with the Canadian truck bringing goods to us, but that was sort of created after kimblebee was rebuffed by OP as if her opinion didn't count because she wasn't a US citizen. If you ask me, that was rude.

So the minute we coat a fruitcake in chocolate, it becomes illegal???
I didn't take the thread off track on purpose, but thank you![]()
It happened organically. I don't even remember how but it did.
This thread has twisted in so many directions no one is to blame.
No it didn't, if you go back and look, you'll see what happened. But whatever. At least the mocking stopped, so I'm happy.It happened organically. I don't even remember how but it did.
I'm sad to realize that America is really that stupid. I promise you fda if there is something inedible in my chocolate I won't eat it!But a fruitcake is technically edible even if it's not practically so.
I mean - a lollypop can have a stick inside a piece of candy, but it's not completely covered. A Ring Pop has a piece of plastic, but that's not surrounded by the candy. That being said, I was told that a large bank stopped handing out lollypops after a kid choked on the stick.
I'm said to realize that America is really that stupid. I promise you fda if there is something inedible in my chocolate I won't eat it!
Curse you Canada! Why are you guys to smart!? So when things just crunch and don't continue to be chewy we really have to stop and take them out of our mouths?!
Omg!!! We aren't supposed to eat the pits!???!! Oops!How come we haven't outlawed avocados and peaches? Those pits are inedible choking hazards completely encased in something edible.
But a fruitcake is technically edible even if it's not practically so.
.