Briarmom
Bessie Robindale<br><font color=b26b70>Larry's bee
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2005
- Messages
- 13,857
I see I was NOT mistaken about Whoopie. Clear as a bell.
Yes you were. She's talking to the person behind the scenes.
I see I was NOT mistaken about Whoopie. Clear as a bell.
I watched the clip. It was quite clear whoopie was trying to clarify what he was CHARGED with. She made several comments about wanting to state the facts and not let their personal opinions on it have them not be clear about the actual charge.
I would hate to be a celebrity and have all my quotes taken out of context. She was trying to say that it wasn't a straight rape charge.
I don't see the outrage. It happened 32 years ago, the "girl" is now 45 years old and received an undisclosed settlement amount at the time. I believe I read an article a few days ago when this story broke where even she says "for heavens sake, just drop it!!"
It's obvious that Roman Polanski hasn't been out there raping other girls or the news would have surfaced by now. He obviously isn't a danger to society and the only ones screaming for blood are the ones who are typically screaming for blood no matter who's face is on the front of the paper.
This case should be closed and the resources that are being wasted trying to "get" Roman Polanski should put to better use.
Wait, Whoopi is a pedophile??
I watched the clip. It was quite clear whoopie was trying to clarify what he was CHARGED with. She made several comments about wanting to state the facts and not let their personal opinions on it have them not be clear about the actual charge.
I would hate to be a celebrity and have all my quotes taken out of context. She was trying to say that it wasn't a straight rape charge.
So if RP was tried, convicted (well plead guilty to a lesser charge) and given credit for time served, why is he being extredited back here to the US?
Sure I think his sentence was way to short but he can't be tried for the same crime again can he?
So if RP was tried, convicted (well plead guilty to a lesser charge) and given credit for time served, why is he being extredited back here to the US?
Sure I think his sentence was way to short but he can't be tried for the same crime again can he?
Polanski was indicted on six felony charges. He was sent to prison for 42 days and psychologically evaluated, etc. His lawyers worked out a plea deal with the prosecutors where he pleaded guilty to one lesser charge and the others would be dismissed, and the prosecutors would recommend a sentence of time served (the 42 days). After he pleaded guilty, but before sentencing, he got wind that the judge would not give the recommended sentence but might sentence him to 48 more days in prison. He could have withdrawn his guilty plea and gone to trial. However, at that point Polanski left the US and hasn't returned. He was never sentenced in the original case so it's still pending.
Earlier this year, his attorneys went to court to try to get everything dismissed. Their motion was denied.
Ok that makes sense. I thought that he had been sentenced and then the judge changed his mind. Sounds like he needs to come back and face the music. I do feel bad for the victim. It seems she would like this whole situation to just go away.
This man is a disgusting pig and anyone defending him really has their priorities screwed up. He drugged and raped a child. I don't understand how anyone who supports raping children can look themselves in the mirror. Is he someone we should let off because he's a celebrity or because he didn't keep her in a shack for 18 years. RAPE is rape.
Here is the Grand Jury transcript for those of you believe that bulk posted above that this was just a wild girl taking advantage of Polanski:
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/polanskicover1.html
Andy
I realize he later pleaded guilty to a lesser charge, but she made a big thing about getting your facts straight on what he was CHARGED with. The fact is, he was CHARGED with rape. But apparently she doesn't consider it rape-rape.
I read the official police report from 1977. It did not happen at a party the way a previous poster said. According to the report after Polanski learned of the girl (I don't know how) he asked her Mother to let him photograph her......
I don't see the outrage. It happened 32 years ago, the "girl" is now 45 years old and received an undisclosed settlement amount at the time. I believe I read an article a few days ago when this story broke where even she says "for heavens sake, just drop it!!"
It's obvious that Roman Polanski hasn't been out there raping other girls or the news would have surfaced by now. He obviously isn't a danger to society and the only ones screaming for blood are the ones who are typically screaming for blood no matter who's face is on the front of the paper.
This case should be closed and the resources that are being wasted trying to "get" Roman Polanski should put to better use.
I read the official police report from 1977. It did not happen at a party the way a previous poster said. According to the report after Polanski learned of the girl (I don't know how) he asked her Mother to let him photograph her. She consented and Polanski picked her up and took her to Jack Nicholson's house to take the pictures. He took some pictures asked her to take off her top which she did, he took more pictures and asked to take off all her clothes which she did, he asked her to get in a hot tub in a bathroom attached to one of the bedrooms and she did. He took more pictures then got undressed and got in the hot tub with her. He then made sexual advances and she said no. He then said okay go in the bedroom and lay down and relax. She said she wanted to go home. He said I will tkae you home later. He then perform oral sxx on her to which she said stop, he then had intercourse with her where she again said no. At that point Nicholson's then girlfriend Angelica Houstan knocked on the door and Polanski anwered it and said everything was fine. The girl put on her underwear and asked to leave. Her returned to the bed undressed her again and sodomized her. He gave her champange from the start and somewhere along the way gave her half a qualude. He definitely raped her.
He then cut a plea deal when the then prosecuter in LA to plea to sex with a minor and let the 42 days served be his sentence. Before his official sentencing the prosicutor had inapproprite contact with the judge to show pictures of the girl and the judge then decided he was going to through out the plea deal and sentence him to a longer term. That is when Polanski fled the country.
It's like beating a dead horse trying to explain myself. I felt like Whoopi was quite clear on the tape that she wasn't talking about her own opinion and was trying to clarify what the charges were. She didn't KNOW for sure, that's why she was trying to get information from the people backstage over her headset.
I'm not a fan of Whoopi's, but it was clear here what she was doing and she explained it again the next day. In the clips I saw, she didn't enter her personal opinion.
People are so caught up in the words "rape rape" that they weren't listening to what she was trying to say. I abhor when people try to take people's statements out of context and turn them into the bad guy. Suddenly now, people (one poster, anyway) can accuse Whoopie of being a pediphile who supports people who rape children simply because she was admitting to being unclear about the facts and wanting to get them straight for the audience?
Watch the tape again. Try to forget she said the words "rape rape" and actually listen to what she is trying to say.
Now I'm sure there are people that think I'm a pediphile too, so rest assured I think the charges on Polanski should stand and that what he did was rape. I just don't get the whole Whoopie thing.